Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

80%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
269 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
129 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
194 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
89 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
121 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
57 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 29,123
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 63 96 121
1440p QHD 89 95 153 194
1080p Full HD 129 135 216 269

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 135
1920x1080 Low 269
1920x1080 Medium 216
1920x1080 Ultra 129
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Low 194
2560x1440 Medium 153
2560x1440 Ultra 89
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Low 121
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 Ultra 57

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a remarkably strong performance profile for Inside, a puzzle platformer that clearly favors high frame rates over raw graphical fidelity. The data shows this pairing is not merely capable of running the game; it excels at doing so across the vast majority of settings and resolutions tested. While the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K presents a challenge, the overall picture is one of smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay for a title that benefits greatly from fluid motion.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Benchmark results for this combination are consistent and impressive, with the average frame rate scaling predictably with both resolution and graphical preset. At 1920x1080, the game runs exceptionally well across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 268.7 FPS, which is more than quadruple the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving up, the Medium preset still yields a very high 215.6 FPS average, and the High preset maintains a robust 135.3 FPS. Even at the most demanding Ultra preset, the average frame rate is a strong 129.3 FPS, ensuring the experience is never hampered by the CPU or GPU at this resolution.

Stepping up to 2560x1440 shows the expected performance drop, but the results remain far above the playable threshold. The Low preset produces a stellar 193.9 FPS average, while Medium and High settings deliver 153.3 FPS and 95.1 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset at this resolution still clears the 60 FPS bar with a comfortable margin, posting an average of 89.4 FPS. This makes 1440p a very viable target for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even the heaviest preset offers ample headroom.

The most demanding scenario is found at 3840x2160 (4K). Here, the scaling becomes more critical. The Low preset remains exceptionally playable with an average of 120.6 FPS. Medium settings also hold up well, averaging 96.1 FPS. The High preset is the tipping point for the most demanding settings, as it just manages to stay above the 60 FPS playable line with a 62.7 FPS average. However, the Ultra preset at 4K is where this combination struggles, dropping to a 56.7 FPS average, which falls just short of the smooth 60 FPS target. This single data point is the only instance across the entire test suite where the hardware fails to deliver a consistently fluid experience.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions indicates a clear dynamic between the CPU and GPU in this title. The Ryzen 7 5800X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides a strong foundation that prevents CPU bottlenecks even at high frame rates. This is evident at 1080p, where the frame rates are exceptionally high—reaching over 200 FPS on lower presets. At this resolution, the workload often shifts toward the CPU to feed the GPU with data fast enough. The data suggests the 5800X handles this task effortlessly, as the frame rates are not artificially capped by processor limitations.

As the resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the rendering load on the Intel Arc B580 increases significantly. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K demonstrates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. For instance, the gap between 1080p and 4K at the High preset is a substantial difference (135.3 FPS vs 62.7 FPS), which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's role becomes less critical as the GPU's rendering time per frame dominates the overall frame time. The fact that the 4K Ultra preset drops below 60 FPS while 1440p Ultra holds at 89.4 FPS highlights the GPU's workload scaling with pixel count and shader complexity, while the CPU has sufficient headroom to support the GPU at these higher resolutions without becoming a bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Arc B580 is ranked 2823 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the lower-middle portion of all possible pairings, which may seem surprising given the high frame rates observed. This rank is a relative measure against all other CPU and GPU pairings in the database, including those with much more powerful (and expensive) components. The performance is certainly playable, but the rank suggests that many other combinations—likely featuring top-tier CPUs from newer generations and higher-end GPUs—achieve even higher frame rates, especially at 4K Ultra settings where this combo falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The ranking reflects the overall competitive standing of the hardware, not its absolute capability to run the game smoothly on most settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the components in this combo offer a clear picture of what else would perform similarly. The CPU's benchmark average score of 29123 places it in close competition with a few other processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is nearly identical in performance, with a score of 29093 (0.1% slower). The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is also a direct competitor, scoring 28940 (0.6% slower). On the other end, the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (29245) and Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270) are slightly faster, with a 0.4% and 0.5% advantage respectively. This indicates that swapping the 5800X for any of these processors would result in a negligible change in frame rates for Inside.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is closely matched by several other cards. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061) is a near-exact match, being only 0.2% faster. Similarly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895) is 0.6% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172) is 0.7% faster. The NVIDIA P106-100 (23249) is the fastest of the group, at 1% ahead. This data suggests that a builder with any of these other GPUs paired with the Ryzen 7 5800X would see virtually the same performance in Inside, with differences well within the margin of error for real-world testing.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, it can run the game at 4K, but with caveats. The benchmark results show that the Low, Medium, and High presets are playable, with average frame rates of 120.6, 96.1, and 62.7 FPS respectively. However, the Ultra preset is not playable, as it drops to a 56.7 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting to use for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 2560x1440?

A: All four presets are playable at 1440p. The data indicates that the Ultra preset is the best option, as it still achieves a high average of 89.4 FPS, well above the 60 FPS target. This allows for the maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does this combo perform at the 1080p resolution?

A: The combination performs exceptionally well at 1080p, with all presets offering a high-refresh-rate experience. The Ultra preset averages 129.3 FPS, and the Low preset reaches an average of 268.7 FPS. This makes it ideal for 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU more of a limiting factor for this game?

A: The data suggests that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates are very high, indicating that the Ryzen 7 5800X has ample headroom. As the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the performance drop is more pronounced, which is a sign of the Intel Arc B580's rendering workload becoming the primary constraint.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?

A: No. The benchmark data shows that the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 yields an average of 56.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. To achieve a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K, you would need to lower the settings to High or below.

Q: Are there other CPUs that would perform similarly to the Ryzen 7 5800X in this game?

A: Yes. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, which have benchmark scores within 0.6% of the 5800X. Choosing any of these processors would result in nearly identical performance in Inside.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Arc B580 can absolutely run Inside with excellent performance for the vast majority of scenarios. At 1920x1080, every preset, including Ultra, delivers a playable and exceptionally smooth experience, with the lowest average being 129.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, the combination again clears the 60 FPS threshold on all settings, with the Ultra preset being the best choice at 89.4 FPS. The only point of failure is at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which averages 56.7 FPS and falls short of the playable threshold. For a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K, the High preset is the recommended maximum, as it hits 62.7 FPS. In summary, this is a very capable pairing for the game, offering high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, and a solid 4K experience as long as the Ultra preset is avoided.