Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
240 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
114 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
172 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
82 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
52 FPS
8.3ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 29,123
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 54 87 108
1440p QHD 82 86 138 172
1080p Full HD 114 120 192 240

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 120
1920x1080 Low 240
1920x1080 Medium 192
1920x1080 Ultra 114
2560x1440 High 86
2560x1440 Low 172
2560x1440 Medium 138
2560x1440 Ultra 82
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Low 108
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 52

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the Intel Arc B570 ranks at position 2983 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the lower portion of the database's performance distribution. This rank reflects a combination that is far from the top of the field, but the raw benchmark scores of the individual components tell a more nuanced story. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU is at the 65th percentile among all tested graphics cards. The combo's low overall rank is likely influenced by the sheer number of other hardware pairings in the database, many of which use more powerful GPUs. For a game as lightweight as Inside, however, the measured frame rates suggest that this mid-pack ranking does not translate into a poor experience at most settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination's position at 2983 of 3716 tested combos means that roughly 80% of the hardware pairings in the database achieve higher overall performance scores. This is a direct consequence of the GPU's mid-tier standing; the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable but not exceptional. The CPU, in contrast, is a strong performer, with an average benchmark score of 29123 placing it in the 81st percentile. The delta between these two components is significant: the CPU is clearly the stronger half of this pairing in synthetic tests.

When examining the nearest rivals for the GPU, the Intel Arc B570 sits within a narrow band of performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile has an average score of 20534, a delta of 0.1% from the Arc B570, meaning they are effectively tied. The Intel Arc A750 is also nearly identical, with a score of 20582 and a delta of -0.1%. This clustering indicates that the Arc B570's GPU performance is well-understood and that users should expect frame rates nearly identical to those of the RTX 3070 Mobile or the Arc A750 in Inside. The CPU's rivals tell a similar story: the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, Intel Xeon Phi 7210, Intel Core i5-13500HX, and AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT all have average scores within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 5800X, confirming that the processor's compute capability is broadly comparable to a small family of other chips.

CPU and GPU Roles

For Inside, the data shows a clear pattern where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's influence becomes more apparent at lower resolutions with high frame rates. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 108 FPS at Low settings to 52 FPS at Ultra settings, a reduction of 56 FPS. This steep decline as settings increase is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance, as the graphics card struggles to maintain throughput when pixel count and visual effects scale up. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal; even at Low settings, the 108 FPS average is likely constrained by the GPU's rendering capacity rather than the processor's ability to feed it.

At 1920x1080, the situation reverses somewhat. The average frame rate at Low settings reaches 240 FPS, which is a very high number that likely approaches the limits of what the game engine can produce. At this resolution, the CPU's strength becomes evident, as the Ryzen 7 5800X's 16 threads and high single-thread score of 943 in 3dmark ensure that it can keep up with the GPU's output at lower settings. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a drop from 240 FPS to 114 FPS, a 126 FPS difference, which is a larger absolute gap than at 4K but a smaller proportional one. This suggests that at 1080p, the GPU still matters, but the CPU's headroom allows the system to reach very high frame rates that would be impossible with a weaker processor.

The 2560x1440 results fall between these extremes. The average frame rate at Low settings is 172 FPS, dropping to 82 FPS at Ultra. This resolution is a balanced scenario where both components contribute, but the GPU remains the limiting factor at higher presets. The data indicates that for Inside, the CPU is never the primary constraint at any resolution when settings are at Medium or above, as the GPU's workload scales more aggressively with visual quality. Only at 1080p Low does the CPU's performance ceiling potentially come into play, and even then, the 240 FPS average is far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide a clear picture of what other hardware would deliver nearly identical results in Inside. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X's average benchmark score of 29123 is matched by the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H at 29093, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 and Intel Core i5-13500HX are also close, with scores of 29245 and 29270, respectively, both within 0.5% of the Ryzen chip. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, with a score of 28940, completes the group. Any of these processors would produce frame rates in Inside that are indistinguishable from the Ryzen 7 5800X, assuming the same GPU is used.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570's score of 20556 is bracketed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 and the Intel Arc A750 at 20582, with deltas of 0.1% and -0.1%, respectively. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X are slightly further afield but still within 0.5%. This means that swapping the Arc B570 for a RTX 3070 Mobile or an Arc A750 would yield nearly identical performance in Inside, with average frame rates differing by only a frame or two at most. The practical implication is that users who own any of these GPUs can expect the same playability results as the Arc B570, provided their CPU is comparable to the Ryzen 7 5800X.

The Verdict

The verdict for this system is clear: it can run Inside at 60 FPS or higher at all tested resolutions, but the preset quality varies. At 3840x2160, the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium achieving an average of 87 FPS. Ultra and High at this resolution fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 52 and 54 FPS, respectively. At 2560x1440, all four tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra averaging 82 FPS. At 1920x1080, the same is true: every preset clears 60 FPS, and Ultra reaches an average of 114 FPS. The best settings per resolution, defined as the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, are Medium at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combination provide a detailed view of its performance across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate at Low settings is 108 FPS, which drops to 87 FPS at Medium, 54 FPS at High, and 52 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset also has reported minimum and maximum values of 74 and 100 FPS, respectively, indicating some variance but still comfortably above the playable threshold. The Low and High presets lack min/max data, but the averages suggest a smooth experience at Low and a borderline one at High.

At 2560x1440, the averages are higher across the board. Low settings produce 172 FPS, Medium yields 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 and a maximum of 159, High reaches 86 FPS, and Ultra averages 82 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is substantial at 52 FPS, which points to a significant jump in GPU workload when moving from Medium to High settings. The Ultra preset at 1440p still maintains an average above 60 FPS, making it a viable choice for users with high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are the highest of any resolution. Low settings hit an average of 240 FPS, Medium averages 192 FPS with a minimum of 163 and a maximum of 221, High averages 120 FPS, and Ultra averages 114 FPS. The differences between presets are large, but even the most demanding setting at this resolution delivers nearly double the playable threshold. The data shows that this combination is overkill for 1080p gaming in Inside, as even Ultra settings provide a massive cushion above 60 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average frame rate of 87 FPS. This is the optimal choice for 4K play, as it provides a solid margin above the 60 FPS threshold while offering better visual quality than Low. High and Ultra at this resolution average 54 and 52 FPS, respectively, which are below the playable threshold and should be avoided. At 2560x1440, the best preset is Ultra, which averages 82 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it still clears 60 FPS by a comfortable margin. At 1920x1080, Ultra is also the best preset, with an average of 114 FPS. This means users can play at maximum settings at both 1440p and 1080p without sacrificing smoothness.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K with high settings?

A: No, at 3840x2160 with High settings, the average frame rate is 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings at 4K achieve 87 FPS and are the highest playable preset at that resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p for this combination?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, with an average frame rate of 82 FPS. All four tested presets at this resolution clear 60 FPS, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 240 FPS, while Ultra averages 114 FPS. This represents a drop of 126 FPS, but both settings are far above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The GPU is the primary factor at higher resolutions and settings, as shown by the large frame rate drops from Low to Ultra at each resolution. The CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p Low, where the 240 FPS average suggests high processor headroom.

Q: Are there other GPUs that would perform similarly to the Intel Arc B570 in this game?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Intel Arc A750 have average benchmark scores within 0.1% of the Arc B570, meaning they would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside.

Q: Does the combination ever drop below 60 FPS at 1080p or 1440p?

A: No, at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, all tested presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—have average frame rates above 60 FPS. The lowest average at these resolutions is 82 FPS at 1440p Ultra.