Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 77 | 80 | 126 | 162 |
| 1440p QHD | 119 | 128 | 201 | 251 |
| 1080p Full HD | 166 | 179 | 281 | 307 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer from Playdead, and it poses essentially no challenge to a modern mid-range pairing like the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The measured data in this database shows the combination clearing 60 FPS at every tested preset across all three standard resolutions — 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 — with headroom to spare even at Ultra in 4K. This page breaks down exactly what that means for each setting tier and how the hardware compares against its nearest rivals.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 5060 run Inside at 4K?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 the combo averages 77.3 FPS on Ultra, 79.9 FPS on High, 125.5 FPS on Medium, and 161.7 FPS on Low. Every preset clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the fastest frame rate recorded for this pairing in Inside?
A: 307.4 FPS average, at 1920x1080 on Low settings. Even at 1440p Low, the average reaches 251.3 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to rival GPUs?
A: Its average benchmark score of 26331 sits within a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon 860M is 0.3% ahead, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700X a strong CPU for this game?
A: Yes. It sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27578, and its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i5-12600K, AMD Ryzen 7 5800, AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, and Intel Core Ultra 5 125H — all land within 0.3% of its score.
Q: Does Inside need max settings to look its best on this hardware?
A: No compromise is needed. Ultra is playable at every resolution tested, including 4K at 77.3 FPS average, so the highest preset is available everywhere.
Q: How does this combo rank overall for Inside?
A: It ranks 1706 out of 3716 measured combinations — roughly the middle of the field — which reflects how little GPU power a 2016 puzzle platformer demands.
CPU and GPU Roles
For Inside on this pairing, the GPU is the component doing the meaningful work, and even it is barely taxed. The scaling pattern across resolutions makes that clear: at Ultra settings, average frame rates fall from 166 FPS at 1920x1080 to 119.2 FPS at 2560x1440 and 77.3 FPS at 3840x2160. That steady decline as pixel count rises indicates a GPU-bound workload — the RTX 5060 with its 8 GB of GDDR7 and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is filling more of its capacity as resolution climbs.
The CPU's role is largely incidental. The Ryzen 7 5700X, with 8 cores and 16 threads on the Zen 3 architecture, posts a single-thread Passmark score of 3385 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2016, and a game like Inside simply does not lean on that headroom. The near-flat spread between preset tiers at a fixed resolution — at 1080p, Low runs at 307.4 FPS and Ultra at 166 FPS — shows settings scale with GPU load, not CPU load.
That said, the CPU's 79th percentile standing among all CPUs means it will not become a bottleneck in higher-refresh scenarios either. At 1440p Low the pairing averages 251.3 FPS, which is squarely in high-refresh territory, and the 5700X has the multi-thread muscle — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13184 and a Passmark multithread score of 26612 — to keep feeding frames at those rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
The playable threshold in this dataset is 60 FPS average, and every preset at every resolution clears it. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is therefore Ultra across the board:
- 1920x1080 — Ultra: 166 FPS average
- 2560x1440 — Ultra: 119.2 FPS average
- 3840x2160 — Ultra: 77.3 FPS average
There is no resolution-versus-quality trade-off to make here. Ultra at 4K still delivers nearly 30% more than the 60 FPS threshold, and dropping one tier to High at 4K nudges the average to 79.9 FPS. The only reason to lower settings would be chasing very high frame rates for high-refresh displays, where the Low preset at 1080p's 307.4 FPS average becomes relevant.
Measured FPS Breakdown
All figures below are average frame rates measured with this exact pairing; minimum and maximum values were not recorded in this dataset.
1920x1080:
- Low: 307.4 FPS
- Medium: 280.5 FPS
- High: 178.7 FPS
- Ultra: 166 FPS
The jump from Medium to High is the largest single-step drop at this resolution — 101.8 FPS — indicating the heavier post-processing and shadow work in the upper tiers. Even so, Ultra sits well past double the playable threshold.
2560x1440:
- Low: 251.3 FPS
- Medium: 200.6 FPS
- High: 128.3 FPS
- Ultra: 119.2 FPS
The same pattern holds: a steep step between Medium and High, then a gentler decline to Ultra. Every tier remains a high-refresh-class result.
3840x2160:
- Low: 161.7 FPS
- Medium: 125.5 FPS
- High: 79.9 FPS
- Ultra: 77.3 FPS
At 4K the gap between High and Ultra nearly vanishes — just 2.6 FPS separates them — suggesting the workload has become almost entirely resolution-bound at the top tiers. The GPU is pushing pixels more than it is computing effects. Notably, 4K Ultra (77.3 FPS) still beats the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin, and even exceeds what many older combinations manage at 1080p.
Across all twelve measurements, the lowest recorded average is 77.3 FPS. There is no configuration in this dataset where the pairing dips below the playable line.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For a near-identical Inside experience, substitutes can be drawn from each component's rival list.
CPU alternatives: The Intel Core i5-12600K matches the Ryzen 7 5700X's average benchmark score of 27578 exactly (0% delta), making it the most direct swap. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% ahead at 27636, the Ryzen 7 5800 sits 0.2% behind at 27535, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H trails by 0.3% at 27507. Any of these processors would produce effectively indistinguishable results in a game this light on CPU demand.
GPU alternatives: The RTX 5060's average score of 26331 is closely bracketed by the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, 0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, 0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, 0.8% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, 1.2% behind). Given that the 4K Ultra result of 77.3 FPS already sits nearly 30% above the 60 FPS threshold, even the RX 6750 XT — the weakest of the group by this metric — would be expected to hold every preset above the playable line in Inside. The full spread between the strongest and weakest rival here is only 2 percentage points, so the choice among them comes down to factors outside frame rate.
The Verdict
Yes — decisively. The Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 5060 combination runs Inside at every tested resolution and every preset without exception:
- 1920x1080: All four presets playable; best is Ultra at 166 FPS average.
- 2560x1440: All four presets playable; best is Ultra at 119.2 FPS average.
- 3840x2160: All four presets playable; best is Ultra at 77.3 FPS average.
The verdict data confirms that High, Low, Medium, and Ultra all clear the 60 FPS threshold at each resolution, with Ultra as the recommended setting everywhere. For a game released in 2016, that outcome is expected: the pairing's mid-field rank of 1706 out of 3716 combinations reflects the fact that this title simply does not discriminate between mid-range and high-end hardware. Anyone running this build can enable Ultra at 4K and still have close to 30% headroom over the playable line — or drop to 1080p Low and watch the average climb to 307.4 FPS.