Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

64%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
258 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
121 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
183 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
88 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
117 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
7.8ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 27,578
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 57 94 117
1440p QHD 88 90 149 183
1080p Full HD 121 128 207 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 128
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 207
1920x1080 Ultra 121
2560x1440 High 90
2560x1440 Low 183
2560x1440 Medium 149
2560x1440 Ultra 88
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 94
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X sits in a tightly packed performance cluster, with its nearest rivals all within a 0.3% delta. The Intel Core i5-12600K matches the Ryzen 7 5700X exactly at an average score of 27578, making it the closest equivalent for CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 trails by just 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads by the same margin. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H rounds out the group at 0.3% ahead. In practical terms for a game like Inside, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing, as the differences are well within measurement noise.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 also occupies a dense competitive field. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 matches it almost exactly with a 0% delta, which is notable given the architectural gap between the two. The AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics come within 0.1%, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM sits 0.6% behind. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.8% ahead. These results indicate that for Inside, the RTX 2060's performance envelope is well understood: it behaves like a mid-range card that can handle the game's modest rendering demands without difficulty.

The CPU's percentile ranking at 79th among all processors, combined with the GPU's 58th percentile, suggests a balanced pairing. The processor has ample headroom for the game's logic, while the graphics card provides sufficient pixel throughput for the puzzle platformer's visual style. Benchmark results show the CPU's multithreaded score of 26612 in PassMark and a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 13184, both of which are far beyond what Inside requires.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2908 out of 3716 tested combinations in the database for Inside. This places the pairing in the lower third of all recorded configurations, which may seem surprising given the measured frame rates. The ranking reflects the entire spectrum of tested hardware, including far more powerful modern GPUs that push frame rates into the hundreds at higher resolutions.

The rank becomes more meaningful when interpreted alongside the actual performance data. At 1920x1080 Ultra settings, this combination produces 120.8 FPS average, which places it well above the playable threshold. The low ranking is a function of the database containing many high-end configurations, not a reflection of inadequate performance for this specific title. The combo's position suggests that while it is not competitive with top-tier hardware, it delivers a smooth experience for Inside across all tested resolutions and settings.

The percentile gap between the CPU and GPU rankings is worth noting. The processor at the 79th percentile indicates strong relative standing, while the GPU at the 58th percentile shows it is more mid-pack. For Inside, this asymmetry matters less than in GPU-heavy titles, as the game's visual complexity is moderate. The measured data confirms this: even at 4K Ultra, the combo maintains 53.5 FPS, only slightly below the 60 FPS threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and RTX 2060 run Inside at 60 FPS?

A: Yes. The combination maintains 60 FPS or higher at all resolutions except 3840x2160 Ultra. At 4K, Low and Medium settings deliver 117.4 FPS and 94.4 FPS respectively, while Ultra drops to 53.5 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Inside?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 Ultra as the optimal balance, delivering 87.8 FPS average. This resolution allows the highest preset while maintaining comfortable headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its nearest rivals for this game?

A: The RTX 2060 performs within 0.8% of its closest competitors. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and AMD Radeon 680M are essentially equivalent, while the RTX 3050 OEM trails by 0.6% and the RX 7600 leads by 0.8%.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Inside?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, all presets exceed 120 FPS, indicating the CPU handles the game's logic easily. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 53.5 FPS, showing GPU limitations at the highest settings.

Q: What settings should I use for 4K gaming?

A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 provide 94.4 FPS average, which is the highest preset that exceeds 60 FPS at this resolution. Ultra drops below the threshold at 53.5 FPS.

Q: Does the combo's rank of 2908 out of 3716 indicate poor performance?

A: No. The rank reflects the broad spectrum of tested hardware. The measured frame rates show this combination delivers smooth gameplay in Inside, with all 1080p and 1440p presets well above 60 FPS.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is fully capable of running Inside at playable frame rates across most configurations. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra exceeds 60 FPS, with the highest preset delivering 120.8 FPS average. The 2560x1440 resolution also supports all four presets above 60 FPS, with Ultra achieving 87.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low and Medium settings, with Medium providing a comfortable 94.4 FPS average.

The only configuration that falls short is 4K Ultra, which produces 53.5 FPS. This falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold, but all other combinations remain viable. The verdict is clear: this hardware can run Inside smoothly at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with Medium settings or lower. For players prioritizing resolution over visual fidelity, the 4K Medium preset offers an excellent experience with nearly 100 FPS.

The recorded data shows no minimum or maximum frame rate values, only averages, so consistency cannot be fully assessed. However, the average frame rates are sufficiently high across all playable configurations to suggest minimal perceptible stutter. The 57 FPS at 4K High, while technically below 60, is close enough that most players would find it acceptable.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the RTX 2060 shifts with resolution. At 1920x1080, the processor dominates the performance equation. The frame rates across presets range from 257.7 FPS at Low to 120.8 FPS at Ultra, a spread of 136.9 FPS. This wide variance indicates that the GPU's workload scales significantly with visual settings, but even the lowest frame rate far exceeds what the CPU would bottleneck. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 26612, provide more than enough processing headroom for Inside's puzzle logic and physics at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to assert more influence. The frame rates range from 182.8 FPS at Low to 87.8 FPS at Ultra. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra is 52%, compared to 53% at 1080p, showing similar scaling behavior. However, the absolute frame rates are lower, indicating the GPU is doing more work per frame. The RTX 2060's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this resolution, as evidenced by the consistent performance.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The frame rates range from 117.4 FPS at Low to 53.5 FPS at Ultra. The drop from Medium to Ultra is particularly steep, from 94.4 FPS to 53.5 FPS, a 43% reduction. This suggests that the highest preset introduces rendering features that heavily tax the RTX 2060's 1920 shading units and 48 ROPs. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor. The scaling between resolutions shows that the RTX 2060 is the component to watch for players seeking higher visual quality at 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Medium. The recorded average frame rate at this setting is 94.4 FPS, providing substantial headroom above the playable threshold. Low settings achieve 117.4 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. High and Ultra both fall short of the 60 FPS target, with 57 FPS and 53.5 FPS respectively.

For 2560x1440, Ultra is the best available preset, delivering 87.8 FPS average. This is the highest quality setting the game offers, and it comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The next setting down, High, achieves 90.1 FPS, but Ultra provides the full visual experience with only a marginal frame rate cost. All four presets at this resolution are playable, making 1440p the sweet spot for this hardware.

At 1920x1080, Ultra again is the recommended preset, with a recorded average of 120.8 FPS. This provides double the playable threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even during complex scenes. The frame rates across all presets at this resolution are exceptionally high, ranging from 120.8 FPS at Ultra to 257.7 FPS at Low. Players can confidently select Ultra for the best visual fidelity without any performance concerns.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset for this combination reveals consistent performance scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the recorded averages are 257.7 FPS on Low, 207 FPS on Medium, 128.3 FPS on High, and 120.8 FPS on Ultra. The progression shows a 47% reduction from Low to Ultra, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium and High at 38%.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 182.8 FPS on Low, 148.7 FPS on Medium, 90.1 FPS on High, and 87.8 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Medium to High is the steepest at 39%, while High to Ultra shows only a 3% difference. This suggests that the High and Ultra presets impose similar GPU loads at this resolution.

The 3840x2160 results show 117.4 FPS on Low, 94.4 FPS on Medium, 57 FPS on High, and 53.5 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Medium to High is significant at 40%, crossing below the 60 FPS threshold. The difference between High and Ultra is smaller at 6%, indicating that the Ultra preset adds modest additional cost over High at this resolution.

No minimum or maximum frame rate values were recorded in the database, so the data reflects only average performance. The absence of minimum frame data means that occasional dips below the averages cannot be quantified, but the high average values across playable configurations suggest adequate consistency for a smooth experience.