Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 54 | 87 | 108 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 86 | 138 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 120 | 192 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a wide spread of frame rates in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer from 2016. The measured data shows this combination is capable of smooth gameplay at most resolutions, with the primary constraint appearing at 4K with higher presets. Across the board, the combo ranks 2983 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of tested systems, yet the game’s modest demands allow for strong performance in absolute terms.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptionally high frame rates across all settings. With Low settings, the average FPS is 240, which is the ceiling measured for this configuration. Medium settings yield an average of 192 FPS, with a minimum of 163 and a maximum of 221. High settings reduce the average to 120 FPS, while Ultra settings still maintain an average of 114 FPS. None of these presets drop below the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that the system is far from stressed at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains robust but scales down predictably. Low settings deliver an average of 172 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 and a maximum of 159. High settings average 86 FPS, and Ultra settings average 82 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is relatively small, suggesting the GPU handles the extra load of Ultra with only a modest penalty at this resolution. All presets remain well above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes noticeably. Low settings average 108 FPS, and Medium settings average 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 and a maximum of 100. These two presets are playable. However, High settings drop to an average of 54 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra settings average 52 FPS, also below the threshold. The data shows a clear cliff between Medium and High at 4K, where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
The minimum and maximum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the spread from 163 to 221 suggests consistent frame pacing. At 1440p Medium, the spread from 117 to 159 is wider, indicating more variation under load. At 4K Medium, the spread from 74 to 100 shows further instability, yet the average remains playable. For other presets, only average FPS is available, which limits detailed analysis of frame consistency.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?*
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 114, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin.
Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 3840x2160?
A: Medium settings at 4K produce an average of 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74. High settings drop to 54 FPS, so Medium is the most demanding playable preset at this resolution.
Q: How does the combo rank among all tested systems for this game?
A: The combo ranks 2983 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the 80th percentile of tested systems in terms of rank position, meaning about 80% of tested combos perform better.
Q: Is there a large performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?
A: The difference is modest. High settings average 86 FPS, while Ultra settings average 82 FPS, a delta of only 4 FPS. Both are comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Does the system provide playable performance at 4K with Low settings?
A: Yes, Low settings at 3840x2160 average 108 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a viable option for high-resolution play.
Q: What are the minimum FPS values for Medium settings at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, the minimum is 163 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum is 117 FPS. At 4K, the minimum is 74 FPS. All stay above 60 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU benchmarks show the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is closely matched with several rivals. Its average benchmark score of 27051 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27097, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936, a delta of +0.4%, meaning the 5700G is slightly faster. The Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166, a delta of -0.4%, and the Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900, a delta of +0.6%. In practical terms, these four CPUs would deliver nearly indistinguishable performance in Inside, since the game is not heavily threaded and the single-thread scores are all within a narrow band.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a delta of +0.1%, meaning the Arc B570 is essentially tied with this mobile GPU. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -0.1%, also a near tie. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, a delta of +0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, a delta of -0.5%. All four rivals are within 0.5% of the Arc B570’s score, so users with these GPUs should expect similar frame rates in Inside at the same settings.
Given these deltas, a system with the Ryzen 7 5700G and any of these rival GPUs would likely produce frame rates within a few FPS of the measured results. The differences between these components are negligible for this title, meaning the gameplay experience would be equivalent in terms of average FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2983 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the lower portion of the field, with approximately 80% of tested configurations ranking higher. However, the rank does not tell the full story. The game’s low system requirements mean that even a low-ranked combo can still achieve high frame rates. At 1080p, the system is well above the threshold, and at 1440p, it handles all presets with ease. The rank becomes more relevant at 4K, where the combo falls short at High and Ultra settings.
The percentile for the CPU is 79, meaning it performs better than 79% of all tested CPUs in the benchmark database. The GPU’s percentile is 65, indicating it outperforms 65% of all tested GPUs. When combined, the rank of 2983 out of 3716 suggests that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12830.5, are not fully utilized by this game, which is more dependent on GPU throughput at 4K.
The Verdict
The verdict data shows that this PC can run Inside at 60 FPS or higher at every resolution, but not with every preset. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra averaging 114 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, with Ultra averaging 82 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Medium averaging 87 FPS. High and Ultra at 4K fall short, averaging 54 and 52 FPS respectively.
The system is therefore fully capable of running the game at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with reduced settings. For users targeting 4K, the choice is between Low at 108 FPS or Medium at 87 FPS; both provide a smooth experience, but Medium offers better visual quality without dropping below 74 FPS in the minimum frame rate.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 114 FPS. This is the recommended setting for maximum visual quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best choice, with an average of 82 FPS. The system has enough headroom above the 60 FPS threshold to handle the highest preset without issue.
At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is Medium, which averages 87 FPS. This provides a balance between visual fidelity and performance, with a minimum FPS of 74 ensuring consistent smoothness. Low settings are also playable at 108 FPS, but Medium is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data suggests that the GPU becomes the dominant factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU is sufficient at all tested settings. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU work together to produce very high frame rates, with Low settings hitting 240 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 899, is adequate for the game’s logic, and the GPU’s raw throughput is more than enough for the lower pixel count.
At 1440p, the frame rates drop by roughly 30% compared to 1080p across all presets. For example, Ultra drops from 114 to 82 FPS, and Medium drops from 192 to 138 FPS. This scaling indicates that the GPU is beginning to feel the load, but the system still has substantial headroom. The CPU’s role remains secondary, as the frame rate is still largely dictated by the GPU’s ability to fill pixels.
At 4K, the CPU’s influence wanes further. The drop from 1440p to 4K is steep, with High settings falling from 86 to 54 FPS and Ultra falling from 82 to 52 FPS. This is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance, where the Arc B570’s 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 380 GB/s, become the limiting factor. The CPU’s benchmark scores, such as a multi-threaded PassMark score of 24419, are not the bottleneck here; instead, the GPU’s rendering capabilities at 8.3 million pixels are the constraint. The fact that Low settings at 4K still hit 108 FPS confirms that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, but the GPU simply cannot maintain high frame rates with heavier shading loads at this resolution.