Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers consistently high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 Puzzle Platformer. Benchmark data confirms this system clears 60 FPS at every tested resolution and preset, with average frame rates ranging from 83.5 FPS at 4K Ultra to 299.4 FPS at 1080p Low. The data places this combo at rank 1462 out of 3716 tested configurations, indicating strong but not top-tier performance for this title.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?

A: Yes. All four tested settings at 3840x2160 (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest average is 83.5 FPS at Ultra settings, while Low reaches 170.7 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset delivers 131.2 FPS average, making it the most demanding setting that still stays above 60 FPS. Low runs at 271.9 FPS, Medium at 216.7 FPS, and High at 138.9 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, scores 25530, a difference of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U trails slightly at 25485, a 0.1% delta.

Q: How does the GPU perform relative to other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 holds the 61st percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 17208. Its nearest competitor, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 17083, putting the RTX 3070 ahead by 0.7%. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c is 1.5% ahead at 17468.

Q: Which resolution shows the biggest performance jump?

A: Moving from 1440p to 1080p provides the largest relative gain. At Ultra settings, the average FPS increases from 131.2 at 2560x1440 to 181.8 at 1920x1080, a gain of 50.6 FPS. The jump from 2160p to 1440p at Ultra adds 47.7 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 83.5 FPS, while 1080p Ultra reaches 181.8 FPS. This 98.3 FPS difference across resolutions suggests the RTX 3070's workload scales heavily with pixel count, whereas the Ryzen 7 5700 maintains sufficient throughput across all tested settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks at position 1462 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places the system in the upper 60th percentile of all configurations tested for this game. The ranking reflects the hardware's ability to maintain high frame rates even at maximum settings, though it does not reach the top tier of performance.

The measured FPS data shows this combo performs exceptionally well for a 2016 title. At 1080p, even the most demanding Ultra preset produces 181.8 FPS average, which is three times the 60 FPS playable threshold. The system's rank of 1462 suggests that while many higher-end combos exist, this setup delivers a comfortable margin above playability at every resolution.

The percentile standings support this interpretation. The CPU sits in the 78th percentile of all processors, while the GPU holds the 61st percentile among graphics cards. Both components are above average, and their combined performance in Inside reflects that positioning. The gap between the CPU's higher percentile and the GPU's lower one hints that the graphics card is the more likely bottleneck in demanding scenarios, though the measured data shows no such limitation at any tested preset.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions reveals how the workload distributes between the two components. At 1080p, the system runs 299.4 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 181.8 FPS on Ultra, a 117.6 FPS difference. This 39.3% reduction from Low to Ultra at 1080p indicates that both CPU and GPU are handling the increased graphical load, but the GPU is absorbing most of the extra work from higher presets.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern continues. Low settings produce 271.9 FPS while Ultra drops to 131.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 140.7 FPS, larger than at 1080p. This widening gap as resolution increases points to the GPU becoming progressively more dominant in determining frame rates. The CPU's role is less impactful at higher resolutions because the rendering workload grows faster than the CPU-side processing demands.

The most telling comparison comes at 3840x2160. Here, Low settings deliver 170.7 FPS while Ultra falls to 83.5 FPS. The 87.2 FPS difference between presets at 4K is smaller than at 1440p, suggesting the GPU is nearing its throughput ceiling for this game's engine. The CPU, by contrast, shows no signs of becoming a limiting factor — even at 4K Low, the system maintains nearly triple the playable threshold.

Preset scaling across resolutions shows the GPU's dominance. Going from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces FPS by 39.3%, at 1440p by 51.7%, and at 4K by 51.1%. The similar percentage drops at 1440p and 4K indicate that the GPU's load scales nearly linearly with pixel count, while the CPU's contribution becomes relatively smaller at higher resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700's nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark database are closely matched. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530, just 0.1% lower than the Ryzen's 25517. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, a 0.1% difference. These three processors would likely deliver nearly identical performance in Inside, making them viable alternatives if the Ryzen 7 5700 were unavailable.

Two other CPUs fall within a similarly narrow band. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550, 0.1% above the Ryzen 7 5700, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446, 0.3% below. The maximum delta among all four rivals is only 0.4%, meaning any of these processors would produce frame rates within a negligible margin of each other in this game.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070's closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 17083 versus the RTX 3070's 17208, a 0.7% advantage for the NVIDIA card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 trails at 17037, a 1.0% gap, while the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, 1.1% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c leads slightly at 17468, putting it 1.5% ahead of the RTX 3070.

For Inside specifically, these GPU rivals would all perform within a tight window. The largest benchmark gap among the five cards is 2.6% between the Tesla K40c and the HD 7970M. Translating that to the measured FPS data, a user with any of these GPUs would see frame rates within roughly 2-3 FPS of the RTX 3070's results at any given resolution and preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 181.8 FPS average, which is the most demanding setting that remains above 60 FPS. All four presets — Low at 299.4 FPS, Medium at 279.1 FPS, High at 190.9 FPS, and Ultra at 181.8 FPS — comfortably exceed the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best choice, producing 131.2 FPS average. The other presets also clear 60 FPS easily: Low runs at 271.9 FPS, Medium at 216.7 FPS, and High at 138.9 FPS. The margin between the slowest preset (Ultra at 131.2 FPS) and the playable threshold is 71.2 FPS, leaving substantial headroom.

At 3840x2160, Ultra again provides the highest visual quality while maintaining 83.5 FPS average. High settings run slightly faster at 84.6 FPS, but Ultra's 83.5 FPS still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 23.5 FPS. Low settings reach 170.7 FPS and Medium hits 139.1 FPS, both well above the playable mark.

The data shows no resolution where the system fails to reach 60 FPS. Even the most demanding combination — 4K Ultra — produces frame rates 39.2% above the threshold. Players can select the maximum preset at any resolution without worrying about playability.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: this PC runs Inside at 60 FPS or higher across all tested settings. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, with Ultra delivering 83.5 FPS average as the best visual option. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra at 131.2 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset exceeds the threshold, with Ultra at 181.8 FPS.

The system clears the 60 FPS threshold by significant margins at every resolution. The smallest margin occurs at 4K Ultra, where the 83.5 FPS average is 39.2% above the threshold. The largest margin appears at 1080p Low, where 299.4 FPS is nearly five times the playable minimum.

For a puzzle platformer like Inside, the measured performance suggests the game will run flawlessly with maximum settings at any display resolution up to 4K. The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700's 78th-percentile CPU performance and the RTX 3070's 61st-percentile GPU performance proves more than sufficient for this title's demands.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its highest performance. Low settings produce 299.4 FPS average. Medium settings yield 279.1 FPS, a 20.3 FPS reduction from Low. High settings drop to 190.9 FPS, and Ultra settings settle at 181.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 117.6 FPS, showing how much headroom exists even at maximum quality.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but scales down as expected. Low settings deliver 271.9 FPS, which is 27.5 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 216.7 FPS, 62.4 FPS below the 1080p Medium figure. High settings reach 138.9 FPS, and Ultra settings hit 131.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 140.7 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system shows its most constrained performance, yet still remains far above playability. Low settings yield 170.7 FPS, which is 101.2 FPS below the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 139.1 FPS, High settings reach 84.6 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 83.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 87.2 FPS.

Across all resolutions, the pattern holds: performance decreases as resolution increases, but never approaches the 60 FPS threshold. The largest single-step drop occurs between 1080p Medium (279.1 FPS) and 1080p High (190.9 FPS), a 88.2 FPS reduction. The smallest drop appears between 4K High (84.6 FPS) and 4K Ultra (83.5 FPS), a mere 1.1 FPS difference. This suggests that the High-to-Ultra transition at 4K costs almost nothing in performance, while the Medium-to-High transition at 1080p requires a substantial 31.6% frame rate sacrifice.