Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

70%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
301 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
148 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
222 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
106 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
69 FPS
6.5ms Frame Time
10ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 20,282

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 69 68 114 141
1440p QHD 106 110 179 222
1080p Full HD 148 153 248 301

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 153
1920x1080 Low 301
1920x1080 Medium 248
1920x1080 Ultra 148
2560x1440 High 110
2560x1440 Low 222
2560x1440 Medium 179
2560x1440 Ultra 106
3840x2160 High 68
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 114
3840x2160 Ultra 69

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a puzzle platformer that is far more demanding than its minimalist aesthetic suggests. The measured data shows that this system does not merely run the game; it dominates it across every tested resolution and settings preset. With average frame rates ranging from a low of 67.8 FPS at 4K Ultra to a staggering 300.7 FPS at 1080p Low, this hardware pairing offers a wide margin of headroom for high-refresh-rate displays and future-proofing. The following analysis breaks down the recorded performance metrics, optimal settings, and the respective roles of the CPU and GPU in achieving these results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database contains average frame rate measurements for twelve distinct configurations, spanning three resolutions and four quality presets. It is important to note that minimum and maximum frame rate data was not recorded; the analysis relies entirely on the average FPS figures.

1920x1080 (1080p)

At the most common gaming resolution, the system performs exceptionally well. The Low preset yields an average of 300.7 FPS, which is a massive figure that far exceeds the capabilities of most standard 60Hz or even 144Hz monitors. Moving to the Medium preset, the average drops to 248.2 FPS, still an extraordinarily high number. The High preset delivers an average of 153.1 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains an average of 147.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a total performance reduction of approximately 51%, but even the lowest figure is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold.

2560x1440 (1440p)

At the higher pixel density of 1440p, performance remains exceptionally strong. The Low preset averages 221.6 FPS, which is a decrease of about 26% compared to the same preset at 1080p. The Medium preset comes in at 179.1 FPS, while the High preset delivers 109.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most visually demanding configuration tested, still averages 106.2 FPS. This indicates that the system can comfortably handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p, with all presets keeping well above the 60 FPS threshold.

3840x2160 (4K)

Performance at 4K shows a more pronounced impact from the resolution increase, but it remains highly playable. The Low preset averages 140.6 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 221.6 FPS at 1440p, representing a 37% reduction. The Medium preset averages 114 FPS, and the High preset delivers 67.8 FPS. Interestingly, the Ultra preset at 4K averages 68.8 FPS, which is slightly higher than the High preset. This anomaly suggests that the workload scaling between High and Ultra at this resolution is not strictly linear, with the Ultra preset possibly utilizing different rendering paths or the GPU having enough headroom to absorb the extra load. Regardless, both High and Ultra at 4K clear the 60 FPS threshold, making 4K gaming a viable option for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the recorded average FPS, the optimal configuration is to maximize visual fidelity while maintaining a solid 60 FPS floor. The data indicates that the system never falls below 60 FPS in any tested scenario, meaning the most demanding preset is always the best choice.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended setting. It delivers an average of 147.5 FPS, which is 87.5 FPS above the playable threshold. This configuration provides the highest level of visual detail while still leaving substantial performance headroom.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also prevails. The average frame rate at this setting is 106.2 FPS, which is 46.2 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This is a comfortable margin that ensures smooth gameplay even in scenes with complex geometry or dynamic lighting.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains the best choice, with an average of 68.8 FPS. This is 8.8 FPS above the playable threshold. While the margin is slimmer than at lower resolutions, it is still sufficient for a consistently smooth experience. The High preset at 4K, averaging 67.8 FPS, is nearly identical in performance, but Ultra offers slightly better visual quality for a negligible frame rate difference.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows that the system achieves an average of 68.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, and 140.6 FPS with the Low preset. All four presets at 4K clear the 60 FPS playable threshold.

*Q: What is the maximum frame rate recorded for this hardware in Inside?*

A: The highest average frame rate in the database is 300.7 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the High and Ultra presets?

A: The difference varies by resolution. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 153.1 on High to 147.5 on Ultra, a 5.6 FPS difference. At 1440p, the drop is from 109.9 to 106.2, a 3.7 FPS difference. At 4K, the Ultra preset actually averages slightly higher (68.8 FPS) than the High preset (67.8 FPS), a difference of 1.0 FPS in favor of Ultra.

Q: How does the system perform at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The average frame rate at 2560x1440 with the Medium preset is 179.1 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and indicates that the system has significant headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at this resolution.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded in the entire test suite?

A: The lowest average is 67.8 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with the High settings preset. This is still above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS in any configuration?

A: No. According to the measured data, every single combination of resolution and settings preset yields an average frame rate above 60 FPS. The lowest recorded average is 67.8 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival scores for both the CPU and GPU, which helps contextualize the performance of this specific combination.

For the AMD Ryzen 7 5700, the closest comparable processors in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (with a delta of -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (also -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (+0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (+0.3%). These processors have average scores within a fraction of a percent of the Ryzen 7 5700, indicating that they would offer nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Inside. For example, a system with an AMD Ryzen 5 6600H would likely produce frame rates within the margin of error of the measurements recorded here.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (with a delta of -1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (-1.2%), the Intel Arc B570 (-1.3%), and the Intel Arc A750 (-1.5%). These GPUs have average scores that are 1% to 1.5% lower than the RTX 2070 SUPER. In practical terms for Inside, this means a system using an Intel Arc A750 would deliver frame rates approximately 1.5% lower across the board. At 4K Ultra, this would translate to a projected average FPS of roughly 67.8 (68.8 * 0.985), which would still remain above the 60 FPS threshold. The performance deltas are so small that all of these alternative GPUs would provide a nearly identical gaming experience in this title.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets allows for an analysis of which component is the primary driver of performance in Inside.

Comparing the scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same preset reveals the impact of the GPU. At the Low preset, the average frame rate drops from 300.7 FPS at 1080p to 140.6 FPS at 4K, a 53% reduction. This substantial drop indicates that the GPU is heavily utilized, as the increased pixel count directly affects the rendering workload. Similarly, at the Ultra preset, performance drops from 147.5 FPS at 1080p to 68.8 FPS at 4K, a 53% reduction. The consistent percentage drop across presets strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The CPU's role is more evident when examining the scaling between presets at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average FPS from 300.7 to 147.5, a 51% performance penalty. This shows that the higher-quality settings, which often include more complex lighting, shadows, and post-processing effects, place additional load on the system. However, the fact that the frame rate remains extremely high even at Ultra suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution. The Ryzen 7 5700, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, has sufficient single-threaded and multi-threaded performance to feed the GPU effectively.

At 4K, the picture is clearer. The difference between the Low preset (140.6 FPS) and the Ultra preset (68.8 FPS) is a 51% reduction, but the absolute numbers are lower than at 1080p. This indicates that while the settings still matter, the GPU's raw rendering capability at 4K is the dominant constraint. The CPU has less impact on the final frame rate at higher resolutions because the GPU is spending more time on each frame. In summary, the data shows that at 1080p, the system has enough CPU headroom to push frame rates into the hundreds, while at 4K, the GPU workload becomes the primary limiter, though the CPU still provides enough throughput to keep the Ultra preset well above 60 FPS.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: this system can run Inside flawlessly at all tested settings. The database lists every single configuration as playable, with the Ultra preset being the best choice at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 147.5 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. This makes the system ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it provides a smooth and responsive experience with maximum visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 106.2 FPS, maintaining a comfortable 46.2 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. This is an excellent result for 1440p gaming, offering a rich visual experience without any performance concerns.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 68.8 FPS. While this is the lowest margin of the three resolutions, it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 8.8 FPS. This confirms that the system is capable of true 4K gaming in Inside with all settings maximized.

Ultimately, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination is not just adequate for Inside; it is overqualified. The data shows a system with enormous performance headroom, capable of delivering a flawless experience at any resolution, from 1080p Low for extreme frame rates to 4K Ultra for maximum immersion. This is a definitive pass on all counts.