Inside

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 achieves a rank of 1989 out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This places the combo in the upper-middle portion of the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 46% of all recorded configurations while trailing the top tier. For a puzzle platformer with modest graphical demands, this ranking reflects a system that is far from the bleeding edge but comfortably capable of delivering a smooth experience.

The ranking is driven by the individual strengths of both components. The CPU holds an 84th percentile position among all processors in the database, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all graphics cards. When combined, their performance in this title is solid but not exceptional, as the game's simple 2D side-scrolling visuals do not push either component to its limits. The data indicates that the bottleneck here is not raw hardware capability, but rather the game's own low system requirements, which means even mid-range parts can achieve very high frame rates.

What is notable is the consistency of the combo's performance across resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers frame rates well above the playable threshold of 60 FPS at every preset, and even at 4K, the lowest recorded average is 74 FPS. This suggests that the combo's ranking is limited by the sheer number of high-end configurations in the database, not by any weakness in this specific pairing for Inside.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Ryzen 7 3700X is essentially performance-equivalent to several other processors in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores within 0.1% of the 3700X, while the AMD EPYC 4244P is also 0.1% ahead. On the Intel side, the Core i5-13450HX is 0.2% faster, and the Core Ultra 7 165H is 0.5% slower. In practical terms, swapping the 3700X for any of these chips would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside, as the game is not heavily CPU-bound at the settings tested.

For the GPU, the RTX 5060's closest competitors are a mixed bag. The AMD Radeon 860M is 0.3% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is also 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% faster. These deltas are all within a narrow band, meaning that a user with any of these GPUs would experience virtually indistinguishable performance in Inside. The data suggests that the RTX 5060 is well-matched with these alternatives for this particular game, and the choice between them would come down to other factors like driver support or feature sets, not frame rates.

It is notably the GPU's nearest rivals include integrated and entry-level discrete solutions, which underscores how undemanding Inside is. Even a mobile-class chip like the MX550 comes within 0.3% of the RTX 5060's average score in the database, though the RTX 5060's measured FPS in this game are far higher than what those weaker chips could deliver.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: this game is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, but the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates climb dramatically. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is substantial, with Low hitting 158.6 FPS and Ultra dropping to 74 FPS. This 84.6 FPS gap is purely a function of GPU rendering load, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card at 4K.

At 1440p, the scaling shifts. Low runs at 215.8 FPS, Medium at 203.8 FPS, and High at 127.4 FPS, with Ultra at 123.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is only 12 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs 76.4 FPS. This suggests that the High preset introduces a significant GPU workload increase, while the CPU is still not the limiting factor at this resolution.

At 1080p, the CPU's role becomes more apparent. Low runs at 242.9 FPS, Medium at 227.1 FPS, High at 177.3 FPS, and Ultra at 167.9 FPS. The frame rate ceiling at Low is near 243 FPS, which is likely close to the CPU's maximum throughput for this game. The fact that Ultra only drops to 167.9 FPS, a 75 FPS reduction from Low, indicates that the GPU is still doing most of the work, but the CPU is starting to matter more. If the CPU were weaker, the Low preset frame rate would be lower, and the gap between presets would shrink.

In summary, the GPU is the dominant factor for visual quality settings at all resolutions, but the CPU sets the upper bound for maximum frame rates at 1080p. For a 60 FPS target, either component is more than sufficient, and the system never comes close to a CPU bottleneck at the playable threshold.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The answer is a definitive yes, and then some. The verdict data shows that every resolution and every preset tested clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 4K, the lowest average is 74 FPS on Ultra, which is still 14 FPS above the threshold. At 1440p, Ultra runs at 123.9 FPS, and at 1080p, Ultra delivers 167.9 FPS. There is no configuration in the measured data that falls below 60 FPS, making this a flawless result for the game.

The best settings at each resolution are also Ultra, which is the most demanding preset. This means the system not only runs the game, but it runs it at maximum quality without any compromise. At 4K, Ultra averages 74 FPS, which provides a smooth experience on a 60 Hz display and is even usable on a 75 Hz monitor. At 1440p, Ultra averages 123.9 FPS, which is ideal for high refresh rate displays. At 1080p, Ultra averages 167.9 FPS, which will satisfy even the most demanding 165 Hz or 240 Hz panels.

For users with a 60 Hz monitor, the system offers massive headroom. Even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate is 23% above the threshold, meaning there will be no drops below 60 FPS in normal gameplay. The data confirms that this combo is overkill for Inside, but in the best possible way: it guarantees a flawless experience with no settings compromises.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 4K?

A: All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) maintain 60 FPS at 4K. The most demanding, Ultra, averages 74 FPS, which is well above the threshold.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra, 1080p averages 167.9 FPS, while 4K averages 74 FPS. The 1080p result is 93.9 FPS higher, representing a 127% increase in frame rate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?

A: The GPU is the primary factor at 1440p. The frame rate drops from 215.8 FPS at Low to 123.9 FPS at Ultra, a 91.9 FPS difference that is driven by GPU rendering load. The CPU has sufficient headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: Can this system run Inside on a 240 Hz monitor?

A: Yes, at 1080p on Low settings, the system averages 242.9 FPS, which exceeds 240 Hz. At 1080p Ultra, it averages 167.9 FPS, which is below 240 Hz but still very smooth.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the RX 6750 XT in this game?

A: The RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score that is 1.2% higher than the RTX 5060. In practical terms, this difference is negligible, and both GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Inside.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS in the measured data is 74 FPS, which occurs at 4K Ultra settings. This is still 14 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 167.9 FPS. This is the most demanding preset, and it still provides a frame rate that is nearly three times the 60 FPS threshold. For users with high refresh rate monitors, this is the optimal choice.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best setting, averaging 123.9 FPS. This is a significant drop from 1080p, but it remains far above the playable threshold. The 1440p Ultra experience is smooth and visually identical to 1080p Ultra in terms of quality.

At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best setting, with an average of 74 FPS. This is the only resolution where the frame rate dips below 100 FPS, but it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. For 4K displays, this is the recommended preset, as it provides the full visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

In all cases, the data indicates that there is no need to lower any settings. The system has enough headroom to run Inside at maximum quality at every resolution tested, making it a perfect match for this game.