Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

96%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
283 FPS
High 1080p Measured
229 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
174 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
230 FPS
High 1440p Measured
148 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
112 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
124 FPS
High 4K Measured
79 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
4.4ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 34,260
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

View Full Benchmarks More Games

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 79 95 124
1440p QHD 112 148 176 230
1080p Full HD 174 229 257 283

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 229
1920x1080 Low 283
1920x1080 Medium 257
1920x1080 Ultra 174
2560x1440 High 148
2560x1440 Low 230
2560x1440 Medium 176
2560x1440 Ultra 112
3840x2160 High 79
3840x2160 Low 124
3840x2160 Medium 95
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a Puzzle Platformer from 2016. The recorded data shows this combination is far beyond the demands of the title, maintaining fluid performance even at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The analysis below details the optimal configurations, performance comparisons, and the specific roles of the CPU and GPU.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra. The measured average frame rate at this configuration is 61 FPS, which clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS by a single frame. This makes Ultra the recommended setting for a 4K display, though the margin is minimal and any fluctuation could theoretically cause a dip below the target.

For 2560x1440 (1440p), the Ultra preset also remains the best choice, with a measured average of 112 FPS. This provides a substantial buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for a fully maxed-out visual experience without any performance concerns.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the Ultra preset achieves an average of 174 FPS. This is the highest average among all Ultra settings across resolutions and indicates that the hardware is heavily underutilized at this resolution, leaving significant headroom for high refresh rate displays.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sits very close to several other processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has an average score of 34222, a mere 0.1% difference from the 3700X. Similarly, the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also a 0.1% delta. The Intel Core i5-13450HX is the closest rival with a score of 34333, which is 0.2% higher. Finally, the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, a 0.5% difference. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Inside, as the game's frame rates are overwhelmingly determined by the graphics card.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is matched most closely by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which has an average score of 54209, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has an average score of 55698, putting it 2.6% ahead of the RTX 4080 in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a 2.7% lead. Despite these minor synthetic differences, all of these GPUs would produce frame rates well above 60 FPS in Inside, making them functionally equivalent for this specific title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data provides a clear picture of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 283 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 257 FPS, with a minimum of 219 FPS and a maximum of 296 FPS. High settings yield an average of 229 FPS, while Ultra settings result in an average of 174 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 109 FPS, showing the scaling of graphical load on the system.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 230 FPS. Medium settings drop to an average of 176 FPS, with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 202 FPS. High settings average 148 FPS, and Ultra settings average 112 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a noticeable performance hit at every preset, with the Ultra setting losing 62 FPS on average.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 124 FPS. Medium settings average 95 FPS, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS. High settings average 79 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 61 FPS. The 4K resolution imposes the heaviest load, with Ultra averaging 63 FPS less than at 1440p. The data indicates that the performance difference between resolutions is consistent, with each step down in resolution costing a significant number of frames.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset is the only one with complete min and max data. At 1080p, the spread between the minimum and maximum FPS is 77 frames, while at 1440p it is 53 frames, and at 4K it is 29 frames. This pattern suggests that lower resolutions produce wider variance, potentially due to CPU bottlenecking at lower settings.

The Verdict

This PC can run Inside at maximum playable settings in all tested resolutions. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings, High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x240p. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 61 at 4K, 112 at 1440p, and 174 at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 61 FPS. This is the only configuration that just barely meets the requirement, leaving no room for error. At 2560x1440, the Ultra setting averages 112 FPS, more than doubling the threshold. At 1920x1080, the average of 174 FPS is nearly three times the threshold.

The data shows that the RTX 4080 is the dominant factor in performance, as the CPU is never the limiting component. The frame rates scale directly with resolution, which indicates that the GPU is being tasked progressively harder. The CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution, as evidenced by the extremely high FPS at lower resolutions.

The hardware combination is overqualified for this game. The only scenario where the performance is not excessive is at 4K Ultra, and even then, it still maintains an average of 61 FPS. For a game from 2016, the hardware is significantly more powerful than necessary.

The recorded data shows that the GPU is the primary determinant of FPS, as the GPU scaling across resolutions is the key metric. The CPU is not a bottleneck, as the CPU performance is far beyond what the game requires. The CPU is a secondary factor, as the CPU is not a limiting factor.

The CPU is sufficient to drive the GPU efficiently at all times, as the GPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU is not a bottleneck, as the CPU is more than adequate. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is not a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

CPU and GPU Roles

The GPU is the dominant component in determining frame rates across all settings and resolutions. The GPU scaling shows a clear pattern. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 283 at Low to 174 at Ultra, a total range of 109 FPS. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 230 at Low to 112 at Ultra, a total range of 118 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 124 at Low to 61 at 61 at Ultra setting 61 at Ultra, a total range of 63 FPS.

The CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution, as the CPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the GPU is the primary determinant of FPS. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck. The CPU is not a limiting factor, as the CPU is a bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: The average frame rate is 61 FPS.

Q: Which resolution and settings combination produces the highest average FPS?

A: The 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings produces the highest average at 283 FPS.

Q: Are all settings playable at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, all settings are playable at 2560x1440, with Ultra averaging 112 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum recorded FPS for Medium settings at 3840x2160?

A: The minimum FPS for Medium settings at 3840x2160 is 80 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average score of 54209, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080.

Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded for Medium settings at 1920x1080?

A: The maximum FPS for Medium settings at 1920x1080 is 296 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 1961 out of 3716 tested combinations in this game. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, but not at the absolute top. The extremely high frame rates achieved in this title indicate that the ranking is more a function of the overall competitive landscape rather than any deficiency in this specific hardware pairing. The data shows that this combo is more than capable of delivering a flawless experience in Inside at all resolutions and settings.