Inside

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 4K with this AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B370 combination?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 64 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 51 FPS average, and High and Ultra average 32 FPS and 30 FPS respectively.

Q: Can this system run Inside at 1080p with maximum visual quality?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High, Medium, and Low presets also clear 60 FPS, with averages of 70, 113, and 141 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in raw benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its nearest rival is the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, or 0.5% higher, while the AMD Radeon HD 7650M is 0.7% higher at 1192. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all tested processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X ranks in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, has an average score of 27578, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-12600K also scores 27578, also 0.2% lower.

Q: Which resolution shows the largest gap between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440, the gap is largest: Low runs at 101 FPS while Ultra runs at 48 FPS, a difference of 53 FPS. For comparison, at 1080p the gap is 74 FPS (141 FPS Low vs 67 FPS Ultra), and at 4K the gap is 34 FPS (64 FPS Low vs 30 FPS Ultra).

Q: How many total combinations did the database rank for this game?

A: The database ranked 3716 total combinations. This specific combo (Ryzen 5 7600X + Arc B370) ranks at position 3422, meaning it is in the lower portion of all tested configurations for Inside.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 64 FPS. High, Medium, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS mark: 32, 51, and 30 FPS respectively. The Medium preset does have a min FPS of 43 and a max of 59, but it does not reach the 60 FPS average threshold.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the most demanding playable preset is Medium, averaging 81 FPS. The Low preset runs faster at 101 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that still clears 60 FPS. High drops to 51 FPS and Ultra to 48 FPS, both below the threshold.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the most demanding playable preset is Ultra, averaging 67 FPS. This is the best visual quality available at this resolution. High runs at 70 FPS, Medium at 113 FPS, and Low at 141 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended maximum given it stays above the 60 FPS line.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to feed the GPU, which explains the wide spread between presets: Low runs at 141 FPS, Medium at 113, High at 70, and Ultra at 67. The step from High to Ultra is small (3 FPS difference), suggesting that the GPU is nearing its limit even at 1080p on the highest preset.

Moving to 1440p, the GPU load increases significantly. The Low preset still runs at 101 FPS, but Medium drops to 81, High to 51, and Ultra to 48. The gap between Medium and High (30 FPS) is much larger than at 1080p (43 FPS between Medium and High), indicating the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck. The CPU is less taxed at this resolution, as the frame rate is still high enough that the 7600X's single-thread performance is not limiting.

At 4K, the GPU saturation is complete. Low runs at 64 FPS, Medium at 51, High at 32, and Ultra at 30. The difference between High and Ultra is only 2 FPS, while the jump from Low to High is 32 FPS. This shows that the Arc B370's fill rate and shading resources are exhausted at 4K, regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, does not appear to be a limiting factor at any resolution; the scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.

The data reveals that the CPU's role is minimal in this game. The Ryzen 5 7600X has a strong single-thread score (1965 in Cinebench R23) and multi-thread score (15236), but Inside is a 2D puzzle platformer that does not heavily utilize many threads. The GPU, however, determines the ceiling: at 4K, the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS and 20 ROPs are insufficient for higher presets. The 64 FPS average at 4K Low is notably achieved, but the GPU cannot handle the extra shading work at Medium and above.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 7600X sits within 0.4% of three key rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X has an average benchmark score of 27578, which is 0.2% lower than the 7600X's 27636. The Intel Core i5-12600K scores identically at 27578, also 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is slightly higher at 27712, putting it 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27535, which is 0.4% lower. For Inside, any of these would perform nearly identically, since the game is not CPU-bound at any resolution in this data.

On the GPU side, the Arc B370's nearest rivals are all much older GPUs, reflecting its low percentile rank (5th percentile). The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 has a score of 1186, just 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower. In terms of Inside's FPS, these would all be expected to deliver very similar performance to the Arc B370, since the 3DMark Steel Nomad scores are within a narrow range.

Given the GPU scores, the database suggests that this combo's performance is primarily limited by the GPU. The CPU's high percentile (79th) and strong benchmark scores do not translate into higher FPS at 4K, because the GPU is the bottleneck. For players with a CPU like the Ryzen 7 5700X or i5-12600K, swapping them for the 7600X would not change the measured FPS in this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K):

• Ultra: average 30 FPS, no min/max recorded
• High: average 32 FPS, no min/max recorded
• Medium: average 51 FPS, min 43, max 59
• Low: average 64 FPS, no min/max recorded

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Ultra: average 48 FPS, no min/max recorded
• High: average 51 FPS, no min/max recorded
• Medium: average 81 FPS, min 69, max 93
• Low: average 101 FPS, no min/max recorded

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Ultra: average 67 FPS, no min/max recorded
• High: average 70 FPS, no min/max recorded
• Medium: average 113 FPS, min 96, max 130
• Low: average 141 FPS, no min/max recorded

The data shows a consistent scaling pattern. At 1080p, the step from Low to Medium is a 28 FPS drop, Medium to High is a 43 FPS drop, and High to Ultra is a 3 , FPS drop. At 1440p, the step from Low to Medium is 20 FPS, Medium to High is 30 FPS, and High to Ultra is 3 FPS. At 4K, Low to Medium is 13 FPS, Medium to High is 19 FPS, and High to Ultra is 2 FPS. The High to Ultra gap is consistently small (2-3 FPS) across all resolutions, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds minimal shading overhead.

The Medium preset at 4K is the only one with recorded min/max values (43-59 FPS), showing that it stays within a narrow range but does not hit 60 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 69-93 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1080p Medium, the range is 96-130 FPS, indicating smooth performance.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The answer depends on resolution and preset expectations.

At 1080p: yes, fully. The Ultra preset runs at 67 FPS average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold with headroom. High runs at 70 FPS, Medium at 113, and Low at 141. This resolution is completely playable at all settings.

At 1440p: partially. The Medium preset runs at 81 FPS average, which is above 60 FPS. Low runs at 101 FPS. However, High and Ultra both fall below 60 FPS, at 51 and 58 FPS (not 58; the data says 48 for Ultra, 51 for High). The best playable setting is Medium, which provides a solid 81 FPS.

At 4K: restricted. The Low preset is the only one that reaches 60 FPS, at 64 FPS average. Medium drops to 51 FPS, High to 32, and Ultra to 30. This resolution requires the lowest settings to be playable.

The database classifies this combo at rank 3422 out of 3716, which places it in the bottom 8% of tested combinations for Inside. The GPU's low performance percentile (5th in the database) is the primary reason, as the CPU is in the 79th percentile. The system is capable of running the game but with significant limitations at higher resolutions and presets.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3422nd out of 3716 combos tested for Inside. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. The rank reflects the GPU's limited capability rather than the CPU's. The CPU's percentile of 79 is high, but the GPU's percentile of 5 drags the overall rank down.

The database shows that this GPU is only at the 5th percentile, meaning most other GPUs outperform it. In this game, the GPU is the deciding factor for FPS, especially at high resolutions. The CPU's strong benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 15236, Geekbench single-core 2603) do not help much because Inside's a lightweight. 2D title that does not stress the CPU.

For players with this combo, the implication is clear: stick to 1080p for a smooth experience, or use 1440p with Medium settings. 4K is possible but only at Low quality. The rank of 3422 indicates that most other tested systems offer higher FPS, but the data shows that this combo is still playable at the lower resolutions.