Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 153 | 160 | 254 | 275 |
| 1440p QHD | 243 | 247 | 296 | 321 |
| 1080p Full HD | 271 | 275 | 330 | 358 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D delivers overwhelming performance in Inside, a 2016-released Puzzle Platformer. The benchmark data shows that this combination is not merely playable but dramatically overpowers the game at every tested resolution and preset, with average frame rates ranging from 153 FPS at 4K Ultra to 358 FPS at 1080p Low. The data indicates a system that is effectively bottlenecked by the game's modest demands rather than by any hardware limitation.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1920x1080 resolution?
A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 1080p, with an average frame rate of 271 FPS. This exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 2560x1440 resolution?
A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 1440p, with an average frame rate of 243 FPS. All four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 3840x2160 resolution?
A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 4K, with an average frame rate of 153 FPS. Even the most demanding setting remains more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS.
Q: How does the average frame rate scale between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 275 FPS on Low to 153 FPS on Ultra, a reduction of 122 FPS. The Medium preset sits between these at 254 FPS, while High averages 160 FPS.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded across all tested configurations?
A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded is 216 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with the Medium preset. Minimum frame rates are only provided for the Medium settings across all resolutions.
Q: How does this system's performance rank among all tested combinations?
A: The combination ranks 146th out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the top percentile of all tested hardware pairings for Inside.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals that Inside presents minimal challenge to either component in this pairing, but the performance scaling across resolutions and presets provides insight into where each component's headroom lies. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates range from 271 FPS at Ultra to 358 FPS at Low. Moving to 2560x1440, the corresponding figures are 243 FPS at Ultra and 321 FPS at Low. At 3840x2160, the averages fall to 153 FPS at Ultra and 275 FPS at Low.
The resolution scaling indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more relevant as pixel count increases, but the overall pattern is one of extreme abundance. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces average frame rates by roughly 7-11% across presets (e.g., 275 to 247 FPS on High), while moving from 1440p to 4K produces a more substantial drop of approximately 35-38% (e.g., 247 to 160 FPS on High). This larger drop at 4K suggests the RTX 5090 D's rendering workload scales with pixel throughput, yet even the most demanding configuration leaves substantial performance on the table.
The CPU's role appears minimal, given that even at 1080p Low—where the GPU has the least work—the Ryzen 5 7600 sustains 358 FPS. The 3DMark benchmarks for the CPU show a single-thread score of 999 and a max-thread score of 6503, indicating strong single-core performance that is well-suited to the game's logic. The GPU's passmark G3D score of 44065 and its 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs further confirm that neither component is stressed by Inside's modest requirements.
The fact that Ultra presets at every resolution remain far above 60 FPS suggests that the game's settings scale primarily with GPU resources, particularly at 4K where the 153 FPS Ultra result still represents nearly 2.5 times the playable threshold. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with 6 cores and 12 threads, is more than sufficient for a puzzle platformer of this era. The data shows no scenario where either component becomes a limiting factor, as even the lowest recorded minimum frame rate of 216 FPS (4K Medium) exceeds the playable threshold by 156 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 271 FPS. This represents the highest visual quality option available in the test set, and the system clears the playable threshold by 211 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is again Ultra, with an average frame rate of 243 FPS. This is 183 FPS above the playable threshold, indicating substantial headroom even at this higher resolution.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 153 FPS. This remains 93 FPS above the playable threshold, meaning the system can run the game at maximum settings at 4K without any concern for frame rate drops below playability.
Across all three resolutions, the Ultra preset is the recommended setting, and the data shows no scenario where the player would need to sacrifice visual quality for performance. The worst-case configuration—4K Ultra—still delivers an average frame rate that is more than double the playable threshold.
The Verdict
This PC can run Inside with exceptional ease. According to the verdictByResolution data, all four tested settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at every resolution from 1920x1080 through 3840x2160. The best settings at each resolution are consistently Ultra, with average frame rates of 271 FPS at 1080p, 243 FPS at 1440p, and 153 FPS at 4K.
The system clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a minimum of 93 FPS (at 4K Ultra) and by as much as 298 FPS (at 1080p Low). There is no resolution or preset combination in the data where the frame rate approaches the playability limit. The verdict is unambiguous: this hardware combination provides a fully playable experience at maximum settings across all tested resolutions, with enough performance headroom to handle any additional demands the game might impose in more complex scenes.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 358 FPS, Medium averages 330 FPS with a minimum of 281 FPS and maximum of 380 FPS, High averages 275 FPS, and Ultra averages 271 FPS. No minimum or maximum values are recorded for the Low, High, or Ultra presets at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 321 FPS, Medium averages 296 FPS with a minimum of 252 FPS and maximum of 340 FPS, High averages 247 FPS, and Ultra averages 243 FPS. As with 1080p, only the Medium preset has recorded minimum and maximum values.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 275 FPS, Medium averages 254 FPS with a minimum of 216 FPS and maximum of 292 FPS, High averages 160 FPS, and Ultra averages 153 FPS. The Medium preset again provides the only paired minimum and maximum values.
The data shows a consistent pattern: average frame rates decrease as resolution increases, with the most pronounced drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens with resolution—at 1080p the difference is 87 FPS (358 vs. 271), at 1440p it is 78 FPS (321 vs. 243), and at 4K it is 122 FPS (275 vs. 153). The Medium presets consistently offer a middle ground, with the 4K Medium result showing a minimum of 216 FPS, which remains well above the playable threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination ranks 146th out of 3716 tested configurations for Inside, placing it in the top 4% of all tested hardware pairings. The rank reflects the extreme performance ceiling of the RTX 5090 D, which sits in the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, paired with the Ryzen 5 7600 in the 78th percentile among all CPUs.
The high rank is unsurprising given the game's release date of 2016-07-06 and the modern hardware involved. The RTX 5090 D's average benchmark score of 77712, combined with the CPU's average benchmark score of 26324, produces a system that vastly exceeds the requirements of a puzzle platformer from this era. The 146th rank out of 3716 indicates that while there are 145 other combinations that score higher in this game, the overwhelming majority of tested systems (3570 combinations) perform worse. This places the combo in an elite tier, though the game's low demands mean that even significantly weaker hardware would likely achieve playable frame rates.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this game. For the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, the closest matches by average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (avg score 26274, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (avg score 26402, delta -0.3%), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (avg score 26212, delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (avg score 26187, delta 0.5%). These rival CPUs have scores within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 7600's 26324 average, meaning they would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Inside, where the CPU is not a limiting factor.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (avg score 76904, delta 1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (avg score 78940, delta -1.6%), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (avg score 79396, delta -2.1%), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (avg score 79605, delta -2.4%). These GPUs have average benchmark scores within 2.4% of the RTX 5090 D's 77712 score. In Inside, where even the most demanding 4K Ultra setting produces 153 FPS, these alternative GPUs would likely deliver similar frame rates, with the performance deltas translating to only a few frames per second difference at most. The data suggests that any of these rival components could substitute for the tested hardware without materially changing the gaming experience, given the enormous performance headroom this game allows.