Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

85%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
361 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
269 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
322 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
232 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
276 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
145 FPS
3.6ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 26,324
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 145 150 243 276
1440p QHD 232 242 295 322
1080p Full HD 269 278 333 361

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 278
1920x1080 Low 361
1920x1080 Medium 333
1920x1080 Ultra 269
2560x1440 High 242
2560x1440 Low 322
2560x1440 Medium 295
2560x1440 Ultra 232
3840x2160 High 150
3840x2160 Low 276
3840x2160 Medium 243
3840x2160 Ultra 145

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is an extreme combination for a 2016 puzzle platformer like Inside. Benchmark data confirms this pairing is overwhelmingly powerful for the title, delivering frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The data shows a system that is effectively bottlenecked by the game’s engine limits rather than hardware capability, making it a top-tier performer for this specific title.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo's overall rank for Inside?*

A: This CPU and GPU pairing ranks 164th out of 3,716 tested combos for the game, placing it in the top 4.4% of all configurations tested, according to the benchmark data.

*Q: Can this system handle Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, at 3840x2160, all four tested presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are considered playable, with average frame rates ranging from 145 FPS at Ultra to 276 FPS at Low.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset is the most demanding setting tested and remains fully playable, achieving an average of 231.7 FPS at 2560x1440 resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26,324, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF, but 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 0.6% higher than the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, but 1.4% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X.

Q: Does the game utilize the full potential of the RTX 5090?

A: The data suggests the game is highly CPU-bound at lower resolutions. For instance, at 1080p, the average FPS only scales from 360.6 (Low) to 268.5 (Ultra), indicating the GPU is being held back by the game's engine and CPU performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 secures a rank of 164 out of 3,716 tested configurations for Inside. This places the system in the top percentile of performers, underscoring that this hardware is overkill for the title’s demands. The ranking reflects the sheer ceiling of the RTX 5090, which sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, paired with a strong 7000-series CPU that is in the 78th percentile among all processors.

The raw performance of these components is staggering. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 79,842 puts it just ahead of professional-grade Tesla P100 cards, while the CPU’s 26,324 average score is nearly identical to that of the Ryzen 9 6900HX, differing by only 0.2%. However, within the context of Inside, this hardware is not being stressed. The measured frame rates at 1080p and 1440p suggest the game’s logic and draw calls are the limiting factor, not the graphics card’s 104.8 TFLOPS of compute power or the CPU’s 12 threads. This high rank reflects the hardware’s capability, but the data implies that a far less powerful system could achieve similar playable results in this specific game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases, but even the most demanding scenario is handled with ease.

At 1920x1080, the system produces extraordinary frame rates. The Low preset averages 360.6 FPS, while Medium averages 333 FPS. High settings yield 277.6 FPS, and the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, still averages 268.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 92.1 FPS, showing that even at the highest settings, the system is nowhere near its limits.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 321.8 FPS, followed by Medium at 294.7 FPS. High settings drop to 242.4 FPS, while Ultra averages 231.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 90.1 FPS, but all presets remain well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system finally begins to show some scaling pressure. Low settings average 276 FPS, while Medium averages 243.3 FPS. High settings drop significantly to 149.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 145 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 131 FPS, which is the most pronounced difference across all resolutions. This indicates that the GPU is finally becoming a more significant factor at 4K, though it still maintains massive performance headroom.

The Verdict

According to the verdict data, this system can unequivocally run Inside at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The playable settings list for 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 includes High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, confirming that every preset clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The best settings at each resolution are all set to Ultra. At 4K, the Ultra preset runs at an average of 145 FPS, which is more than double the playability threshold. At 1440p, Ultra averages 231.7 FPS, and at 1080p, it reaches 268.5 FPS. The data is clear: there is no configuration in the benchmark suite that challenges this hardware. The RTX 5090’s 32GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, combined with the Ryzen 5 7600’s 32MB of L3 cache, provide a level of performance that is entirely wasted on a game released in 2016. The verdict is a resounding yes, with the system delivering a flawless experience at the highest possible settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the CPU plays a dominant role in this game, particularly at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes more relevant only as resolution scales. At 1080p, the average FPS across all presets is extremely high, ranging from 268.5 to 360.6 FPS. The fact that these numbers are so close, despite the GPU’s massive compute capability, suggests that the frame rate is being limited by the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The Ryzen 5 7600’s single-thread score of 999 in 3dmark is high, but it is still a bottleneck for a game that cannot utilize all 12 threads or the GPU’s 21,760 shading units.

As resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the GPU begins to assert its influence. The drop from 360.6 FPS at 1080p Low to 276 FPS at 4K Low is a 23.5% reduction, which is more pronounced than the drop from 268.5 FPS at 1080p Ultra to 145 FPS at 4K Ultra, a 46% reduction. This shows that the Ultra preset, which likely includes more demanding shaders and post-processing, is starting to leverage the RTX 5090’s power. However, even at 4K Ultra, the system is not fully utilizing the GPU, as evidenced by the fact that the score is still over 100 FPS higher than the playable threshold. The data suggests that for Inside, the CPU is the primary mover of performance at 1080p, but the GPU becomes a co-equal partner at 4K, though neither component is ever pushed to its limit.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra at every resolution, according to the verdict data.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 268.5 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it provides a frame rate that is over four times the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 231.7 FPS. This is a slight reduction from 1080p but still offers an incredibly smooth experience with all visual features enabled.

At 3840x2160, Ultra averages 145 FPS. This is the lowest average FPS recorded for the Ultra preset, but it remains more than double the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring a flawless 4K experience.

For players seeking maximum visual fidelity, the Ultra preset is the clear choice at all resolutions. The data shows no reason to compromise on settings, as even the most demanding configuration at 4K delivers performance that exceeds the requirements of high-refresh-rate monitors. The system’s capability is so far beyond the game’s needs that users can simply select the highest options and enjoy a locked, smooth frame rate.