Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 81 | 85 | 139 | 173 |
| 1440p QHD | 131 | 139 | 219 | 272 |
| 1080p Full HD | 181 | 192 | 301 | 358 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination delivers overwhelming performance in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that places minimal stress on modern hardware. Measured frame rates across all three resolutions and four quality presets remain far above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the weakest result still hitting 80.9 FPS at 4K Ultra settings. The data shows a system that never approaches its limits, making this pairing effectively overkill for the game’s demands.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional numbers that highlight the game’s low graphical overhead. The Low preset reaches 358.3 FPS average, while Medium sits at 301.3 FPS. High drops to 191.5 FPS, and Ultra maintains 181.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is approximately 177 FPS, indicating that even the heaviest settings consume only a fraction of the available headroom. No min or max frame data is recorded, but the averages alone suggest a consistently smooth experience across all presets.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scaling remains linear and predictable. Low shows 272.4 FPS, Medium 218.5 FPS, High 138.9 FPS, and Ultra 131 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 24-30% depending on the preset, which aligns with the increased pixel count. Ultra at 1440p still exceeds 130 FPS, meaning there is no scenario where this resolution challenges the hardware meaningfully.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding configuration tested, the combo still performs admirably. Low produces 172.6 FPS, Medium 138.9 FPS, High 84.7 FPS, and Ultra 80.9 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra at 4K is only about 3.8 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the highest preset. Even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the lowest recorded average across all tests is 80.9 FPS. The data indicates that resolution scaling primarily affects the GPU workload, but the RTX 3070 has ample compute resources for this title.
Across all measurements, the pattern is consistent: Inside’s simple 2D side-scrolling visuals and limited draw distances create a scenario where even a mid-range GPU from 2020 dominates. The Ryzen 5 7600’s single-thread performance, evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2521 and 3DMark single-thread score of 999, ensures the CPU never becomes a bottleneck. The lowest frame rate recorded in any configuration is 80.9 FPS, which is still 34.8% above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Inside?
A: The highest recorded average is 358.3 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the absolute ceiling for this pairing, and even the most demanding preset at 1080p, Ultra at 181.4 FPS, delivers more than triple the playable threshold.
Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 80.9 FPS. This is the lowest result in the entire measured dataset, yet it remains 20.9 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold, confirming that 4K Ultra is fully playable.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks?
A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, placing it 0.7% above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083), 1% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037), and 1.1% above the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019). It trails the NVIDIA Tesla K40c by 1.5% (17468). These are synthetic benchmark comparisons, not game-specific metrics.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Ryzen 5 7600 and its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324. It leads the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX by 0.2% (26274), the Intel Core i9-11900KF by 0.4% (26212), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U by 0.5% (26187). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS by 0.3% (26402). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Is there any resolution or settings combination where the combo fails to reach 60 FPS?
A: No. The verdict data lists all settings presets at all three resolutions as playable. The lowest average frame rate across every tested configuration is 80.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, which exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Inside?
A: The combo ranks 1343rd out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the 36th percentile of all systems. This means roughly two-thirds of tested configurations perform better, but given the game’s low requirements, the absolute frame rates are still far above playability.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals that the GPU is the primary performance driver in Inside, but only at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high that the CPU likely becomes the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 7600’s single-thread benchmark score of 999 in 3DMark indicates strong per-core performance, yet the game’s engine appears to scale poorly beyond a certain frame rate. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 176.9 FPS, which is substantial, but the absolute numbers suggest the CPU cannot feed the GPU fast enough to reach even higher values.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more significant role. The frame rate drops from 272.4 FPS at Low to 131 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of 141.4 FPS. This scaling indicates that the RTX 3070’s workload increases with resolution, but the CPU still maintains enough throughput to keep frame rates above 130 FPS in all presets. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces Ultra performance from 181.4 FPS to 131 FPS, a 27.8% decrease, which is roughly proportional to the 77% increase in pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The frame rate drops from 172.6 FPS at Low to 80.9 FPS at Ultra, a 53.1% reduction. The jump from 1440p to 4K reduces Ultra performance from 131 FPS to 80.9 FPS, a 38.2% decrease. This is more than the 2.25x pixel increase would suggest, indicating that the game’s rendering pipeline becomes less efficient at higher resolutions. The CPU’s role diminishes further, as the Ryzen 5 7600’s 6 cores and 12 threads never appear to be saturated given the frame rates remain high.
The settings scaling provides additional insight. At 4K, moving from High to Ultra costs only 3.8 FPS, suggesting that Ultra’s additional effects are minor. At 1440p, High to Ultra costs 7.9 FPS, and at 1080p, it costs 10.1 FPS. This pattern indicates that the gap between High and Ultra remains consistent across resolutions, but the absolute impact is small. The data shows that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and 8 GB GDDR6 memory are sufficient for all tested configurations, as no stutter or frame drops are recorded.
The Verdict
This PC can run Inside with exceptional ease. The verdict data confirms that all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at every resolution tested. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 181.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best choice with 131 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra is again the optimal setting, delivering 80.9 FPS. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the lowest result across all combinations is 80.9 FPS, which is 34.8% above that mark.
The data indicates that no configuration comes close to failing the 60 FPS test. Even the most demanding scenario—4K Ultra—maintains a comfortable margin. The combo’s rank of 1343rd out of 3716 tested configurations suggests that many systems outperform it, but those systems are likely unnecessary for Inside. The game’s 2016 release date and puzzle platformer genre mean that modern mid-range hardware is more than adequate. Users with 60 Hz displays will experience locked frame rates at any settings, while those with high-refresh monitors can push beyond 100 FPS at 1440p or 4K with lower presets.
The RTX 3070’s 8 GB VRAM and the Ryzen 5 7600’s 32 MB L3 cache are not stressed by this title. The GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU’s 12735 Cinebench R23 multi-core score are far beyond what Inside requires. The verdict is unambiguous: this combination delivers a flawless experience at every resolution and settings level tested.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 181.4 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting, and it still provides more than triple the playable threshold. Users can enable every graphical feature without concern.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, delivering 131 FPS. The additional pixel count reduces performance by 50.4 FPS compared to 1080p Ultra, but the result remains far above 60 FPS. This makes 1440p Ultra the recommended configuration for users with 144 Hz monitors, as the frame rate is close to the refresh rate.
At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the optimal setting, with an average of 80.9 FPS. This is the only resolution where the frame rate drops below 100 FPS, but it still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by 20.9 FPS. For users with 4K displays, this is the clear choice, as it provides the best visual quality without sacrificing playability. Medium at 4K offers 138.9 FPS, which might be preferable for high-refresh 4K monitors, but Ultra is the most demanding preset that remains playable.
The data shows a consistent pattern: Ultra is the best settings preset at all three resolutions. The frame rates at Ultra range from 80.9 FPS to 181.4 FPS, all comfortably above 60 FPS. There is no need to reduce settings for performance reasons, as the hardware handles the maximum quality without issue.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination ranks 1343rd out of 3716 tested configurations for Inside, placing it in the 36.1st percentile. This means 2373 other combos perform better, while 1343 perform worse. The rank indicates that this is a mid-tier system among all tested hardware, but the game’s low requirements render the ranking somewhat academic.
The GPU’s benchmark percentile is 61, meaning it performs better than 61% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 17208 places it slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037), but slightly below the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468). The CPU’s percentile is 78, with an average score of 26324, placing it just behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26402) and ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274).
In the context of Inside, the rank is less meaningful because the game is not demanding. The lowest recorded frame rate of 80.9 FPS at 4K Ultra would be considered excellent even for systems ranked much higher. The 36th percentile ranking reflects synthetic benchmarks that include titles with far heavier workloads, but for this specific game, the combo delivers performance in the top tier. Users should interpret the rank as an indicator of general hardware capability rather than a measure of suitability for Inside, where the system vastly exceeds requirements.