Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Inside
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 92 | 101 | 158 | 193 |
| 1440p QHD | 151 | 154 | 250 | 313 |
| 1080p Full HD | 208 | 217 | 333 | 356 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers overwhelming performance for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that places minimal strain on modern hardware. Across every resolution and preset combination measured, this system produces frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, often by a factor of three or more. The data reveals a configuration that is effectively bottleneck-free for this title, with the GPU scaling predictably as resolution increases and the CPU providing ample headroom even at lower settings where frame rates climb to extreme levels.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces its highest raw frame rates, with the Low preset averaging 355.5 FPS. Medium settings reduce this to 332.9 FPS, while High averages 216.5 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding at this resolution, still maintains an average of 208.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 41.4% reduction in average frame rate, yet even the lowest figure remains more than triple the playability threshold.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but show the expected impact of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 313.2 FPS, Medium drops to 250.3 FPS, High falls to 154 FPS, and Ultra achieves 150.7 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is notably small, just 3.3 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not particularly taxing on the GPU. The jump from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra costs roughly 57.7 FPS, indicating a 27.7% performance penalty for the resolution upgrade.
At 3840x2160, the system still delivers well above 60 FPS at every preset. The Low setting averages 193.1 FPS, Medium drops to 158 FPS, High averages 100.9 FPS, and Ultra remains playable at 92.1 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 101 FPS, which is the largest absolute gap across all resolutions, reflecting the GPU's increasing workload at higher pixel densities. Notably, the transition from 1440p to 4K at Ultra results in a 58.6 FPS drop, a 38.9% reduction, which is the steepest percentage decline observed in the dataset.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and Radeon RX 9070 combination ranks 889th out of 3716 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the top 24% of all configurations in the benchmark database. This percentile ranking is notably lower than the raw frame rates might suggest, primarily because Inside is a lightweight title where even mid-range hardware can achieve high scores. The combo's rank reflects the fact that many other systems, including those with older or less powerful components, can also run this game at high frame rates, compressing the performance distribution at the top end.
The rank of 889 out of 3716 means that roughly 2,827 tested combos perform worse in this game, while 888 perform better. Given that the measured frame rates at 4K Ultra exceed 90 FPS, the systems ranked above this combo are likely achieving even more extreme frame rates, possibly at lower resolutions or with more powerful GPUs. The data suggests that for a game like Inside, the CPU and GPU combination is far more than sufficient, and the ranking is more a reflection of the game's low system requirements than any deficiency in this hardware.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern where the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises, while the CPU's role diminishes at higher pixel counts. At 1920x1080, the frame rates across presets show a wide spread from 208.4 FPS at Ultra to 355.5 FPS at Low, indicating that the GPU is still the primary limiter even at this resolution, but the CPU is capable of feeding it enough data to reach these high numbers. The Ryzen 5 7600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, demonstrates sufficient single-thread performance to avoid becoming a bottleneck at these frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the frame rate spread narrows somewhat, with Ultra at 150.7 FPS and Low at 313.2 FPS. The percentage drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 51.9%, compared to 41.4% at 1080p, showing that the GPU is taking on more work relative to the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7600's role becomes less critical as the GPU's rendering time increases, though it still needs to maintain high IPC and clock speeds to support frame rates above 300 FPS at the Low preset. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and Zen 4 architecture clearly handle this workload with ease.
At 3840x2160, the pattern intensifies. The spread from Low (193.1 FPS) to Ultra (92.1 FPS) represents a 52.3% reduction, nearly identical to the 1440p spread. However, the absolute frame rates are lower, meaning the GPU is spending more time per frame on pixel shading and memory bandwidth. The RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K, but the data shows that the GPU is increasingly the limiting factor. The CPU's contribution at 4K is minimal, as even the Low preset frame rate of 193.1 FPS is well within the Ryzen 5 7600's capability to feed.
The Verdict
This PC can run Inside at every resolution and preset combination measured, with all settings clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold by a substantial margin. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 208.4 FPS, which is more than three times the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 150.7 FPS, and even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset maintains 92.1 FPS. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: all four settings at each of the three resolutions are fully playable.
The data indicates that this system is overkill for Inside, as even the lowest-performing combination measured — 4K Ultra at 92.1 FPS — provides a smooth experience with significant headroom. There is no resolution or setting combination where the frame rate approaches the 60 FPS threshold, let alone dips below it. For players with high-refresh-rate displays, the 1080p and 1440p results are particularly noteworthy, as the Low and Medium presets exceed 300 FPS, potentially saturating even the fastest gaming monitors.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX has an average benchmark score of 26274, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 5 7600's 26324. This mobile processor would deliver nearly identical performance in Inside, though its mobile design might reduce sustained performance in a desktop context. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 5 7600, making it a slightly faster alternative. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, 0.4% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, 0.5% lower.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a similar pattern of close performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z has an average score of 23736, which is 0.6% lower than the RX 9070's 23877. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24063, 0.8% higher, making it the closest competitor from the same manufacturer. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23628, 1.1% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, 1.2% higher. In practice, any of these GPUs paired with the Ryzen 5 7600 would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the RX 9070's results in Inside.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 208.4 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS. Since all presets exceed the threshold at this resolution, Ultra is the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing playability. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 150.7 FPS, again the best choice for players who prioritize image quality while maintaining a frame rate more than double the playable threshold.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 92.1 FPS, which remains comfortably above 60 FPS. This is the most demanding setting available, and it still provides a smooth experience. The data shows that even at 4K, there is no need to reduce quality settings to achieve playable frame rates. For all three resolutions, the Ultra preset is the optimal choice, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining frame rates that are far above the minimum requirement.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K Ultra settings?*
A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 92.1, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest frame rate achieved by this combination?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 355.5, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 208.4 at 1920x1080 to 92.1 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 116.3 FPS or approximately 55.8%.
*Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in Inside?*
A: The data shows the GPU becomes the primary limiter at higher resolutions, with a 52.3% frame rate reduction from Low to Ultra at 4K, while the CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases.
Q: Is the Low preset ever necessary to achieve playable frame rates?
A: No, all presets at all resolutions exceed 60 FPS, so the Low preset is never required for playability.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: The combination ranks 889th out of 3716 tested combos for Inside, placing it in the top 24% of all systems in the database.