Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

83%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
351 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
265 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
314 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
209 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
269 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
131 FPS
3.7ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 56,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 131 138 220 269
1440p QHD 209 219 290 314
1080p Full HD 265 270 324 351

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 270
1920x1080 Low 351
1920x1080 Medium 324
1920x1080 Ultra 265
2560x1440 High 219
2560x1440 Low 314
2560x1440 Medium 290
2560x1440 Ultra 209
3840x2160 High 138
3840x2160 Low 269
3840x2160 Medium 220
3840x2160 Ultra 131

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is an overwhelmingly powerful combination for running Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016. Benchmark data shows this system delivers exceptionally high frame rates across every tested resolution and preset, with the RTX 5080's raw graphics horsepower ensuring that even at 4K Ultra, the game runs far above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The CPU, which ranks in the 77th percentile among all tested processors, provides more than enough single-thread and multi-thread performance to prevent any bottleneck in this title, which is not particularly demanding on modern hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of extremely high performance, with the lowest average frame rate recorded still being more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160 (4K) resolution, the system demonstrates remarkable capability across all four tested presets. With High settings, the average FPS is 138, which is already well above what most users would consider smooth gameplay. Moving to Medium settings at 4K, the average FPS climbs to 220, with a minimum of 187 and a maximum of 253, indicating excellent frame time consistency even during demanding scenes. Low settings at 4K push the average to 269 FPS, while Ultra settings, which are typically the most demanding, still deliver an average of 131 FPS. The data shows that even the most graphically intensive configuration at the highest resolution tested does not stress this hardware combination.

At 2560x1440 resolution, performance scales as expected, with every preset delivering frame rates that would be considered overkill for most displays. High settings produce an average of 219 FPS, while Low settings reach 314 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p yields an average of 290 FPS, with a minimum of 246 and maximum of 333, showcasing both high performance and stability. Ultra settings at this resolution deliver 209 FPS on average, which is still far above the threshold where any display would struggle to show all the frames being rendered.

The 1920x1080 results are the highest of all tested configurations, which is logical given the lower pixel count. High settings at 1080p average 270 FPS, Low settings reach 351 FPS, and Medium settings hit 324 FPS with a minimum of 275 and maximum of 372. Ultra settings at 1080p average 265 FPS, which is only slightly lower than the High preset due to the increased graphical load. Across all resolutions and presets, the minimum FPS values recorded only appear in the Medium settings data, and even those minimums are dramatically above the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting the system rarely, if ever, experiences noticeable frame drops.

The scaling between resolutions is particularly telling. Comparing Medium settings across the three resolutions, the average FPS drops from 324 at 1080p to 290 at 1440p, then to 220 at 4K. This represents a roughly 10% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a further 24% decrease from 1440p to 4K, which is consistent with the increasing pixel count and the GPU's ability to handle the load. The RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that memory bandwidth is never a limiting factor, even at 4K with Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of all tested hardware combinations for Inside, this particular pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 276th out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the top 7.4% of all systems evaluated for this game, which is a strong showing considering the age and relatively low system requirements of Inside. The rank of 276 out of 3716 means that only 275 other combinations of CPUs and GPUs delivered higher average performance in this specific title, which confirms the strength of both components.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores support this high ranking. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F achieves an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs tested. This places it in close competition with several other processors, as shown in the nearest rivals data. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, which is a negligible 0.1% difference from the Ryzen 5 7500F. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911 (0.2% lower) and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (0.4% lower). These tight margins indicate that the CPU's performance tier is well-established, and in a game like Inside, which is not heavily multithreaded, the single-thread performance of 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core is more than sufficient.

The GPU's ranking is even more impressive. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 56083. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55757 (0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with 55698 (0.7% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with 54828 (2.3% lower). The only rival that scores higher is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57367, which is 2.2% above the RTX 5080. This places the RTX 5080 in a very competitive position within its performance class, and when combined with the Ryzen 5 7500F, the overall system ranking of 276 reflects the synergy between these two components.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users considering this build, the nearest rival CPUs to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F provide a clear picture of what would deliver similar CPU-bound performance in Inside. The Intel Core i7-11850H, with an average score of 24935, is statistically indistinguishable from the Ryzen 5 7500F, differing by just 0.1%. This means that in a game like Inside, where the CPU workload is modest, swapping to this Intel processor would yield virtually identical frame rates. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is only 0.2% higher, making it essentially an equal performer. The Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% lower) and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, 0.4% lower) also fall within this tight performance band, so any of these processors would produce nearly the same results when paired with the RTX 5080 in this game.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals to the RTX 5080 offer interesting alternatives. The AMD Radeon 8060S, with a score of 55757, is just 0.6% lower, meaning it would deliver nearly identical FPS in Inside. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a 0.7% deficit, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 2.3% lower. These differences are minor enough that in a title like Inside, which is not particularly GPU-intensive at the highest settings, the frame rate differences would likely be within a few percent. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, scoring 57367, is 2.2% higher and would be the only rival that would show a measurable improvement over the RTX 5080 in this game. However, the RTX 5080's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and Blackwell 2.0 architecture ensure that it has ample headroom for this title and any future games with higher demands.

When considering a full system alternative, pairing any of these rival CPUs with the RTX 5080 would result in virtually identical performance in Inside. The game's low CPU utilization means that even the 0.4% difference between the Ryzen 5 7500F and the Intel Core 5 210H would be imperceptible in actual gameplay. The data indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in this combination, and as long as the CPU is in this performance tier, the frame rates will remain in the same range.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The answer is a definitive yes, and not just at the minimum playable level. The verdict data shows that at every resolution tested, all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra) are marked as playable, meaning they all maintain an average FPS at or above the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 131 FPS. This means that even the most demanding preset at 4K resolution runs at more than double the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings achieve an average of 209 FPS, and at 1920x1080, Ultra settings reach 265 FPS.

The performance headroom is substantial. Even at the most demanding configuration tested (4K Ultra), the average FPS of 131 is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. This means that users with high-refresh-rate displays at 1440p or 4K can take full advantage of their monitors, as the system can push well beyond 120 FPS at these resolutions with Ultra settings. For users with 1080p 240Hz or 360Hz displays, the system's ability to exceed 265 FPS on Ultra settings ensures that the GPU will not be the limiting factor.

The game is a puzzle platformer from 2016, which has relatively modest system requirements compared to modern AAA titles. This hardware combination is vastly overpowered for the game, but that is not a negative. The measured data confirms that the system delivers a flawless experience with no playability concerns at any resolution or preset. The lowest recorded average FPS across all configurations is 131 (4K Ultra), and the minimum FPS values that were recorded (only for Medium settings) are all substantially above 60 FPS, with the lowest being 187 at 4K. This indicates that even in the most demanding scenes, the system maintains excellent frame pacing and never dips near the playability threshold.

FAQ

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this system in Inside?

A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 131, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that the system never comes close to struggling with the game.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, while the Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935. This represents a delta of 0.1%, meaning the two processors are essentially identical in performance. In Inside, this difference would have no perceptible impact on frame rates.

Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 resolution, Ultra settings are listed as playable, with an average FPS of 131. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the system maintains this performance without any recorded minimum FPS dips below 60.

Q: Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 significantly faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE?

A: No, the data shows the opposite. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has an average benchmark score of 57367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080's score of 56083. In Inside, this would translate to a negligible frame rate difference, likely within a few FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p on this system?

A: According to the verdict data, the best settings at 2560x1440 are Ultra, which delivers an average FPS of 209. This is more than triple the 60 FPS playable threshold, so users can run the game at maximum graphical quality without any concern.

Q: How does the system's ranking compare to other tested combinations?

A: This combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 276th out of 3716 tested combinations for Inside. This places it in the top 7.4% of all systems, which is a strong result given the game's relatively low system requirements.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 131 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available in the test data, and the system maintains more than double the playable threshold. Users with 4K displays can confidently select Ultra settings and expect a smooth, high-fidelity experience with no need to compromise on graphical quality.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 209 FPS. This represents a significant improvement over the 4K result, as the lower pixel count allows the GPU to render more frames per second. For users with 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors, this configuration easily supports 144Hz or even 165Hz displays, as the average FPS far exceeds these refresh rates.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings achieve an average of 265 FPS. This is the highest average FPS recorded for any Ultra preset across all tested resolutions. Users with 1080p displays, even those with refresh rates as high as 240Hz, will find that the system can consistently deliver frame rates that match or exceed their display's capabilities. The data shows no scenario where the system falls below 60 FPS, so users can always select the highest quality settings without sacrificing playability.