Inside

Can AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER run Inside? The measured data says yes, and decisively so. This combination, ranking 552nd out of 3,716 tested combos for this title, delivers frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every resolution and preset tested. The benchmark results show a system that is not merely playable but overwhelmingly fast, with average frame rates that suggest the game's puzzle-platformer demands are trivial for this hardware pairing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 552 out of 3,716 tested combinations places it in the top 15% of all systems evaluated for Inside. This percentile position is consistent with the individual component rankings: the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER also sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where neither component is a bottleneck, but the sheer magnitude of the FPS results suggests the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting at higher resolutions.

What is striking about this rank is not that the system is fast — given the hardware, that is expected — but how much faster it is than needed. The game's playable threshold is 60 FPS, yet the lowest average frame rate measured across all twelve resolution/settings combinations is 110 FPS at 4K Ultra. This means the combo is operating with a massive performance surplus, which raises an interesting question: is this hardware overkill for Inside, or does the game simply scale poorly with high-end components? The benchmark data cannot answer the latter, but it clearly shows the former.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K resolution on this system?

A: The data shows Ultra settings at 3840x2160 produce an average of 110 FPS, which is the highest quality preset that maintains playability. The verdictByResolution confirms Ultra as the "bestSettings" at this resolution, with an average of 110 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32,750. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32,707 (0.1% difference), while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812 (-0.2% difference). The performance delta among all four listed rivals is within 0.3%, indicating near-identical CPU performance.

Q: Is the GPU's performance similar to any other graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER's average benchmark score is 43,223. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, which is 1% higher, while the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43,262, just 0.1% lower. The closest match is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43,268, also 0.1% lower.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured average is 278 FPS, with a minimum of 237 FPS and a maximum of 320 FPS. This is the only resolution/settings combo in the data that includes min/max values, providing a clear frame time consistency picture.

Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with the highest settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 110, which is nearly double the 60 FPS threshold. The verdictByResolution lists all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) as playable at 4K.

Q: How does the combo's rank translate to real-world performance expectations?

A: With a rank of 552 out of 3,716 combos, this system is in the 85th percentile of all tested configurations for Inside. The measured FPS data supports this ranking, showing that even the most demanding preset at the highest resolution produces average frame rates well above the playability threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern: this system obliterates the 60 FPS target at every setting. The most demanding configuration — 3840x2160 Ultra — yields an average of 110 FPS. Dropping to High at the same resolution increases the average to 116 FPS. Medium at 4K produces 185 FPS average with a minimum of 157 and maximum of 213. Low at 4K jumps to 231 FPS average.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale predictably. Ultra averages 175 FPS, High averages 184 FPS, Medium averages 278 FPS (minimum 237, maximum 320), and Low averages 302 FPS. The jump from High to Medium at 1440p is particularly notable — a 94 FPS increase — suggesting that the High preset may be applying some GPU-intensive effects that Medium relaxes significantly.

At 1920x1080, the numbers become almost absurdly high. Ultra averages 244 FPS, High averages 256 FPS, Medium averages 311 FPS (minimum 264, maximum 357), and Low averages 337 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows only a 93 FPS drop, which is a relatively narrow band compared to the 121 FPS drop seen at 4K between Low and Ultra. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU begins to play a more significant role, capping the maximum frame rates.

The only configurations with min/max data are the Medium presets across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the spread from minimum to maximum is 93 FPS (264 to 357). At 1440p Medium, the spread is 83 FPS (237 to 320). At 4K Medium, the spread narrows to 56 FPS (157 to 213). This tightening of frame time variance at higher resolutions suggests the GPU is becoming the consistent limiting factor, whereas at lower resolutions, CPU-driven frame pacing introduces more variability.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The answer is an unambiguous yes, with massive headroom. The verdictByResolution data shows that all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at every resolution tested, from 1920x1080 up to 3840x2160. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average frame rates of 244 FPS at 1080p, 175 FPS at 1440p, and 110 FPS at 4K.

The 60 FPS threshold is cleared by a factor of nearly 2x even in the worst case (4K Ultra). This means the system is not just meeting the playability bar but soaring over it. For a puzzle platformer like Inside, this level of performance is far beyond what is required for a smooth experience. The data suggests that users could enable every visual feature without concern, as the lowest average frame rate recorded — 110 FPS at 4K Ultra — still leaves a 50 FPS buffer above the playability threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F's nearest rivals are nearly indistinguishable in average benchmark score. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32,707, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, a -0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662, a 0.3% difference. Any of these processors would deliver virtually identical performance in Inside, as the game's CPU demands are clearly well below what even the slowest of these chips provides.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals show slightly more variance but still fall within a 1% band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43,262, a 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, a 0.2% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, a 1% difference. All of these GPUs would produce similar frame rates in Inside, though the mobile variants may have thermal constraints that affect sustained performance in ways the desktop RTX 4070 SUPER does not.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 244 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting available, and it still delivers more than four times the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings are again the best choice, yielding an average of 175 FPS. The gap between Ultra and High at this resolution is only 9 FPS (175 vs 184), so users could comfortably choose Ultra without sacrificing smoothness.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings produce an average of 110 FPS, which remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that the system has enough headroom at 4K to run the game at its highest quality preset, making the question of settings optimization largely moot — the answer is always Ultra.

The only caveat in the data is the absence of min/max FPS values for most configurations. The Medium presets show minimums that are 15-20% below the averages, so users may occasionally see frame drops, but even the lowest recorded minimum (157 FPS at 4K Medium) is far above the playability threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound pattern. At 1080p, the average FPS across all settings is approximately 287. At 1440p, it drops to approximately 235. At 4K, it falls to approximately 160. This consistent decline with increasing resolution indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver, as would be expected for a visually simple puzzle platformer.

However, the settings scaling tells a more nuanced story. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 93 FPS (337 to 244), a 28% reduction. At 4K, the same comparison shows a 121 FPS drop (231 to 110), a 52% reduction. This disproportionate impact at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU's workload scales more steeply with quality settings at 4K, where pixel fill rate and shading complexity become more demanding.

The CPU's role becomes evident in the maximum frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system hits 337 FPS average, which approaches the CPU's ability to feed frames to the GPU. The Ryzen 5 7400F's single-thread performance, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,072, is sufficient to drive these high frame rates, but the data suggests a ceiling is being approached. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as evidenced by the larger FPS gaps between settings at those resolutions.

For a game like Inside, which is not known for complex CPU simulation, the Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads provide far more processing power than needed. The GPU, with its 7,168 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, is equally overprovisioned. The benchmark results indicate that users could pair this system with a 4K 120Hz display and still not stress either component to its limits. The data implies that the limiting factor for Inside on this hardware is not the components themselves, but the game's own engine and frame rate caps.