Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

94%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
337 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
219 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
302 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
157 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
208 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
99 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 32,750
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 99 104 166 208
1440p QHD 157 165 264 302
1080p Full HD 219 230 311 337

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 230
1920x1080 Low 337
1920x1080 Medium 311
1920x1080 Ultra 219
2560x1440 High 165
2560x1440 Low 302
2560x1440 Medium 264
2560x1440 Ultra 157
3840x2160 High 104
3840x2160 Low 208
3840x2160 Medium 166
3840x2160 Ultra 99

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Inside, a puzzle platformer that is far from demanding by modern standards. The measured data shows this system not only meets but vastly exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and preset, with the lowest average frame rate recorded at 99 FPS in 4K Ultra settings. This pairing of a current-generation 6-core Zen 4 processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace GPU creates a system where the game's modest graphical demands are trivialized, leaving significant performance headroom in all scenarios.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the benchmark database’s nearest rivals for both components provides context for how this system compares to other hardware combinations. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32,750. Its closest competitors in terms of aggregate performance are nearly identical in output. The Intel Core i5-14600T posts an average score of 32,707, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H achieves 32,697, just 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, which is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 rounds out the group at 32,662, trailing by only 0.3%. These sub-0.5% deltas mean a user stepping from any of these processors to the Ryzen 5 7400F would experience no perceptible change in frame pacing or CPU-bound performance in Inside.

On the graphics side, the RTX 4070 holds the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 37,648. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37,628 (0.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 at 37,507 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 at 37,157 (1.3% slower). Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile posts a higher score of 38,135, placing it 1.3% above the desktop RTX 4070 in this aggregate metric. For Inside specifically, any of these GPUs would deliver similar gameplay experiences, as the game’s frame rates are already several times higher than the 60 FPS target even at the most demanding settings. The practical implication is that the RTX 4070 is not uniquely positioned; a system with one of these rival GPUs and a comparable CPU would yield nearly indistinguishable results in this title.

FAQ

*Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 4070 run Inside at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, completely. At 3840x2160, the system achieves an average of 104 FPS on High settings, 166 FPS on Medium, and 99 FPS on Ultra. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are marked as playable at this resolution, with the lowest average being 99 FPS on Ultra.

Q: What is the highest graphical preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: All presets exceed 60 FPS at 1440p. The Ultra preset averages 157 FPS, while High averages 165 FPS, Medium averages 264 FPS, and Low averages 302 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still delivers more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p with the most demanding settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 219 FPS. This drops only slightly from the Low preset’s 337 FPS average, indicating the GPU is not heavily strained by this game even at the highest quality level.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for this combination?

A: The measured data includes min/max values only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the range is 264 to 357 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 225 to 304 FPS; and at 4K Medium, it is 141 to 191 FPS. Other presets only have average FPS values recorded.

Q: Is the RTX 4070’s performance in this game comparable to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: Based on aggregate benchmark scores, the RTX 4070’s closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4, which trails by just 0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is 0.4% behind, and the RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% ahead. These differences would not alter the playability verdict for Inside.

Q: What percentile ranking does this CPU hold among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, has a delta of only 0.1%, meaning the 7400F’s performance is statistically tied with several mid-range and mobile processors.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals how this hardware scales across resolutions and settings. Beginning with 1920x1080, the system produces an average of 337 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 311 FPS on Medium (with a recorded range of 264 to 357 FPS), then to 230 FPS on High, and finally 219 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 118 FPS, indicating that even the most demanding preset at 1080p leaves substantial performance headroom.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages decrease predictably but remain exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 302 FPS, Medium averages 264 FPS (ranging from 225 to 304 FPS), High averages 165 FPS, and Ultra averages 157 FPS. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings is 62 FPS, showing a moderate impact from the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops further but never approaches the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings yield an average of 208 FPS, Medium averages 166 FPS (with a range of 141 to 191 FPS), High averages 104 FPS, and Ultra averages 99 FPS. The scaling from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a 120 FPS reduction, yet the system still maintains nearly 40 FPS of headroom above the playability threshold at the most demanding configuration. The data indicates that resolution scaling is more impactful than preset changes; for instance, switching from 1080p High to 1440p High costs 65 FPS, while switching from 1440p High to 4K High costs 61 FPS.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Inside, and the data confirms it does so with extraordinary margin. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 99 FPS. At 2560x1440, every preset also clears the 60 FPS bar, with Ultra averaging 157 FPS. At 1920x1080, the best settings are again Ultra, delivering 219 FPS on average. In no tested configuration does the system fall below 99 FPS average, which means the RTX 4070 and Ryzen 5 7400F provide a locked and smooth experience at 60 FPS and beyond in all scenarios. The lowest recorded minimum frame rate across all Medium presets is 141 FPS at 4K, which is still more than double the playability threshold. For a game released in 2016, this hardware is vastly overqualified, but the numbers show it handles the load without breaking a sweat.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 839th out of 3,716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the top 22.6% of all configurations tested, which is notable given the game’s low graphical demands. The rank reflects that while the hardware is powerful, many other combos—particularly those with higher-end GPUs or more recent processors—achieve even higher frame rates. The 839th rank suggests that for Inside, this combo is solidly above average but not at the extreme top of the leaderboard. Since the game is not demanding, the rank is likely influenced more by raw GPU throughput than by CPU capabilities, as even mid-range CPUs could push high frame rates in this title. The RTX 4070’s 81st percentile standing among GPUs and the CPU’s 83rd percentile both contribute to a pairing that easily outpaces the majority of systems, but the rank indicates there are over 800 combos that perform better, likely featuring GPUs like the RTX 4080 or RX 7900 series.

Best Settings per Resolution

For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra setting, and the measured averages show no preset fails the threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 99 FPS, which is the best possible quality at that resolution while remaining 39 FPS above the 60 FPS target. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 157 FPS, offering a significant margin over the playability line while delivering maximum visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 219 FPS, providing the highest quality with massive headroom. In every case, the system can run the game at its highest settings without any concern for frame drops below 60 FPS. The data suggests that users could even opt for higher internal resolutions or supersampling, but within the tested presets, Ultra is the clear choice for all three resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The interplay between CPU and GPU in Inside becomes evident when examining the scaling patterns across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 219 (Ultra) to 337 (Low), a spread of 118 FPS. This wide range indicates the GPU is the primary limiter, as lowering settings from Ultra to Low produces a 54% increase in frame rate. At 1440p, the same preset change yields a gain from 157 to 302 FPS, a 92% increase, showing that GPU load is even more dominant at higher resolutions. At 4K, the Low to Ultra spread is 109 FPS (208 to 99), representing a 110% improvement, further confirming that the GPU is the bottleneck.

However, the CPU’s role cannot be dismissed entirely. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides ample single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,072) to avoid bottlenecking the GPU even at 337 FPS in 1080p Low. The fact that the frame rate increases from 1080p Low to 1440p Low (337 to 302 FPS) shows a modest drop, but the system maintains over 300 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. At 4K, the CPU is even less relevant, as the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor—the 4K Ultra average of 99 FPS is only 55% of the 1080p Ultra average of 219 FPS, demonstrating that resolution scaling is entirely GPU-bound. For this game, the GPU is the dominant component at all resolutions, but the CPU’s high single-core score ensures it never becomes a limiting factor, even at the lowest preset where frame rates approach 340 FPS.