Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
310 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
230 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
274 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
173 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
226 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
106 FPS
4.2ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 20,733
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 40,377

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 106 112 178 226
1440p QHD 173 180 254 274
1080p Full HD 230 237 286 310

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 237
1920x1080 Low 310
1920x1080 Medium 286
1920x1080 Ultra 230
2560x1440 High 180
2560x1440 Low 274
2560x1440 Medium 254
2560x1440 Ultra 173
3840x2160 High 112
3840x2160 Low 226
3840x2160 Medium 178
3840x2160 Ultra 106

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. Benchmark data, measured directly rather than estimated, shows this pairing ranks 831st out of 3716 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the top 22% of all configurations. Across every resolution from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, and across every preset from Low to Ultra, the average frame rate never drops below 106.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data indicates this system is not merely capable of running Inside, but rather overpowers it to the point where the frame rate is limited more by the game’s engine than by any hardware constraint.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Inside?

A: The highest average frame rate is 310.1 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Does this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 106.4 FPS, which is 77% above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 20802, which is only 0.3% higher. The Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U both score 20821, representing a 0.4% difference.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 40377.

Q: At which resolution does the frame rate drop below 200 FPS on High settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average frame rate is 111.5 FPS. All other resolutions on High settings exceed 200 FPS: 180.4 FPS at 2560x1440 and 236.8 FPS at 1920x1080.

Q: Is the data for this combo measured or estimated?

A: The data is explicitly marked as measured (dataIsMeasured: true), meaning the frame rates come from actual testing rather than predictive modeling.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 831 out of 3716 tested combinations places this CPU-GPU pairing in the upper quartile of all systems tested with Inside. To contextualize this ranking, consider that the top 831 combinations represent roughly the 22nd percentile, meaning 2885 other tested combos performed worse. This is not a marginal ranking — the system sits comfortably among high-end configurations, but it is not at the very top, suggesting that some combinations of newer or more powerful hardware achieve even higher frame rates.

The ranking reflects the combined capability of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU, with a 74th percentile ranking among all CPUs, contributes strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. Its 3DMark scores range from 913 in single-thread to 5554 in max-thread tests, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 17272. The GPU, ranking in the 82nd percentile, provides substantial graphics throughput, evidenced by a PassMark G3D score of 29137 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077. Together, they create a system that handles Inside with considerable headroom, as evidenced by the fact that even the lowest recorded average frame rate (106.4 FPS at 4K Ultra) is nearly double the playability threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

Examining the scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates performance in Inside. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high: 310.1 FPS on Low, 285.9 FPS on Medium, 236.8 FPS on High, and 229.5 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is only 80.6 FPS, or 26% of the Low setting value. This relatively small spread suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to maintain high frame rates, and the GPU is not the primary bottleneck.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a slightly larger spread between presets: 274.1 FPS on Low, 253.7 FPS on Medium, 180.4 FPS on High, and 172.9 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 101.2 FPS, or 37% of the Low value. This indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, but the CPU still keeps pace without creating a bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the pattern becomes more pronounced. Low settings yield 225.9 FPS, Medium drops to 178.4 FPS, High falls to 111.5 FPS, and Ultra reaches 106.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is now 119.5 FPS, or 53% of the Low value. This larger spread at 4K demonstrates that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor at higher resolutions and more demanding presets. However, even at 4K Ultra, the system delivers 106.4 FPS, which is still far above 60 FPS.

The data shows that Inside is not a demanding title for this hardware. At 1080p, the CPU and GPU are both underutilized, with frame rates exceeding 300 FPS on Low settings. At 4K, the GPU is pushed harder, but the RTX 5070’s 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are more than sufficient. The CPU’s role is consistent across resolutions — it never becomes a limiting factor, as evidenced by the fact that frame rates scale predictably with GPU load.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT’s average benchmark score of 20733 is closely matched by several rivals. The Intel Core i5-12490F scores 20802, a delta of -0.3%, meaning it performs almost identically. The Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U both score 20821, a -0.4% difference. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, a -0.5% difference. All four of these CPUs would behave nearly the same as the Ryzen 5 5600GT in Inside, given that the game’s frame rates are not CPU-limited even at 1080p. The differences in synthetic benchmark scores are within 0.5%, which is negligible for a game that runs at over 200 FPS on most settings.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 40318 (a 0.1% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40063 (0.8% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40870 (-1.2% difference), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at 39568 (2% difference). These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Inside, though the RTX 5070 has a slight edge over most of them. The RTX A500 Mobile is the weakest of the group, with a 2% lower average score, which would translate to a small but measurable frame rate reduction. However, given the massive headroom this system has, even a 2% difference would not push the frame rate below 100 FPS at any tested setting.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best settings that remain at or above 60 FPS are Ultra, which delivers an average frame rate of 229.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it runs at nearly four times the playability threshold. Lower presets provide even higher frame rates, but Ultra is the recommended choice for maximum visual quality without any performance concern.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also deliver the best experience, with an average frame rate of 172.9 FPS. This is 188% above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a smooth and responsive experience at high detail. The data shows no need to compromise on settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings produce an average frame rate of 106.4 FPS. While this is lower than at other resolutions, it is still 77% above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The system can handle 4K Ultra without dropping below playable frame rates, making this the best settings choice for maximum visual fidelity.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Inside? The benchmark data provides a clear answer: yes, and with substantial performance to spare. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all settings at all three tested resolutions are playable. At 1920x1080, the best settings (Ultra) run at 229.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra runs at 172.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, Ultra runs at 106.4 FPS. Every single combination of resolution and preset tested exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, with the lowest recorded average being 106.4 FPS at 4K Ultra.

This means a user can select the highest graphical preset at any resolution and experience smooth gameplay. The frame rates are so high that they exceed typical display refresh rates (60 Hz, 120 Hz, 144 Hz) in most scenarios. At 1080p, even the most demanding preset runs at 229.5 FPS, which would benefit a high-refresh-rate monitor. At 4K, the 106.4 FPS average on Ultra still exceeds standard 60 Hz displays and is close to 120 Hz capability.

The data indicates that this system is overpowered for Inside. The game, released in 2016, does not appear to stress the RTX 5070 or the Ryzen 5 5600GT. The combination ranks 831st out of 3716, meaning it is not the absolute fastest, but it is well above the median. For the vast majority of users, this system will run Inside flawlessly at maximum settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates provide a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the frame rates range from 229.5 FPS (Ultra) to 310.1 FPS (Low). The specific values are: Low 310.1 FPS, Medium 285.9 FPS, High 236.8 FPS, and Ultra 229.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decrease of approximately 7-8% per preset step, with the largest drop occurring between Medium and High (49.1 FPS).

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are lower but still substantial: Low 274.1 FPS, Medium 253.7 FPS, High 180.4 FPS, and Ultra 172.9 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is notable at 73.3 FPS, which is a 29% reduction. This suggests that the High preset introduces significantly more graphical effects that load the GPU at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates decrease further: Low 225.9 FPS, Medium 178.4 FPS, High 111.5 FPS, and Ultra 106.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 47.5 FPS, while the difference between Medium and High is 66.9 FPS. The High to Ultra step is the smallest at 5.1 FPS, indicating that Ultra adds relatively little additional GPU load over High at 4K.

Across all resolutions, the data shows that Low settings provide the highest frame rates, while Ultra provides the lowest. However, even the lowest frame rate recorded (106.4 FPS at 4K Ultra) is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum and maximum frame rates are not provided in the data, so only average frame rates are available for analysis. This means the data cannot indicate frame time consistency or stuttering, but the high averages suggest smooth performance.

The scaling between resolutions is consistent: moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 20-30% depending on settings, and moving from 1440p to 4K reduces them by another 30-40%. This scaling is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, confirming that the RTX 5070 is the primary performance driver at higher resolutions. The CPU’s influence is minimal, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate differences between presets are consistent across resolutions, rather than showing a CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions.