Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
292 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
218 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
264 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
157 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
205 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
100 FPS
4.4ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 21,088
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 100 104 165 205
1440p QHD 157 166 242 264
1080p Full HD 218 226 269 292

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 226
1920x1080 Low 292
1920x1080 Medium 269
1920x1080 Ultra 218
2560x1440 High 166
2560x1440 Low 264
2560x1440 Medium 242
2560x1440 Ultra 157
3840x2160 High 104
3840x2160 Low 205
3840x2160 Medium 165
3840x2160 Ultra 100

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data for Inside on this AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination shows exceptional performance across every resolution and preset tested. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates range from 218.1 FPS at Ultra settings to 291.6 FPS at Low settings. The Medium preset delivers 269.1 FPS, while High settings produce 226.4 FPS. These figures indicate that even the most demanding preset at 1080p leaves massive headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results remain remarkably strong. Low settings average 263.7 FPS, Medium reaches 241.8 FPS, High delivers 165.7 FPS, and Ultra still manages 157.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is roughly 106 FPS, showing that preset selection materially affects performance but never threatens playability. The 1440p numbers suggest the RTX 4070 is not being stressed to its limits, as even Ultra settings nearly triple the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 finally encounters more demanding conditions, though results stay comfortably playable. Low settings produce 205.4 FPS, Medium reaches 165.1 FPS, High averages 104.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 99.6 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra at 4K costs roughly 105 FPS, which is a substantial reduction but still leaves every preset above 95 FPS. The data shows that this game is highly scalable, with the 4K Ultra result representing the lowest measured average across the entire test matrix.

Comparing presets at each resolution reveals consistent scaling patterns. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces average FPS by 73.5 FPS. At 1440p, the same preset shift costs 106.6 FPS. At 4K, the Low-to-Ultra penalty is 105.8 FPS. Interestingly, the High preset sits much closer to Ultra than to Medium at every resolution, suggesting that High and Ultra impose similar shading loads while Medium and Low are substantially lighter.

The minimum and maximum FPS values are not provided in the measured data, so the analysis relies exclusively on average frame rates. All twelve tested configurations—three resolutions across four presets—deliver averages well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest recorded average is 99.6 FPS at 4K Ultra, which remains nearly 40% above the playability baseline. This combination never dips below playable territory in any tested scenario.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Inside at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 99.6 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin. The verdict data confirms that Ultra is the best playable setting at this resolution.

Q: What is the fastest preset at 1920x1080?

A: Low settings deliver the highest average at 291.6 FPS. Medium follows at 269.1 FPS, then High at 226.4 FPS, and Ultra at 218.1 FPS. All presets at 1080p clear 200 FPS.

Q: How much performance drops when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 218.1 at 1920x1080 to 99.6 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 118.5 FPS. At High settings, the drop is from 226.4 to 104.1 FPS, a 122.3 FPS decrease. The scaling penalty is substantial but leaves all resolutions playable.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 the limiting factor at 2560x1440?

A: Benchmark data indicates the GPU has significant headroom at 1440p. Ultra settings average 157.1 FPS, which is far above the 60 FPS threshold. The CPU's performance percentile of 74 places it above most processors, but the measured frame rates suggest neither component is bottlenecking at this resolution.

Q: Does this combination rank highly among tested systems for Inside?

A: The combo ranks 1060 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the upper 28.5% of all systems. This rank reflects strong overall performance for this specific game, though many higher-ranked combos exist.

Q: Are there any settings where the game becomes unplayable?

A: No. Every resolution and preset combination tested produced average FPS above 99.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest result was 4K Ultra at 99.6 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for systems with similar processing power. The Intel Core i3-1220P has an average benchmark score of 21066, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 5600G's 21088 average. This means the i3-1220P would behave nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, a 0.1% advantage over the 5600G. The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21133, trailing by 0.2%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U scores 21174, a 0.4% lead. These four processors represent the closest performance envelope, with deltas under half a percent.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070's nearest rivals show similar graphics performance. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, just 0.1% below the RTX 4070's 37648 average. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, a 0.4% deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, a 1.3% gap. These deltas indicate that swapping the RTX 4070 for any of these alternatives would produce near-identical frame rates in Inside, assuming no other system changes.

A system pairing the Ryzen 5 5600G with the Tesla P4 would likely deliver frame rates within 0.1% of the tested configuration across all resolutions and presets. Similarly, combining the 5600G with the RX Vega 56 would yield results within 0.4% of the measured data. The RTX 4080 Mobile, despite being a mobile part, would outperform the RTX 4070 by roughly 1.3%, translating to approximately 1-3 FPS differences at 4K Ultra where the baseline is 99.6 FPS. The PRO W6400 would trail by about 1.3%, producing around 98 FPS at the same settings.

The Verdict

This combination runs Inside with exceptional authority at every tested resolution. The verdict data lists all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—as playable at 3840x2160, with Ultra achieving 99.6 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all presets are playable, and Ultra delivers 157.1 FPS. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 200 FPS, with Ultra reaching 218.1 FPS. The 60 FPS playable threshold is exceeded by at least 39.6 FPS even in the most demanding scenario tested.

The best settings at each resolution are specified as Ultra. At 4K, Ultra averages 99.6 FPS, which is 66% above the playability threshold. At 1440p, Ultra achieves 157.1 FPS, more than 2.6 times the threshold. At 1080p, Ultra produces 218.1 FPS, which is 3.6 times the threshold. Users seeking maximum visual fidelity can enable every setting without concern for playability.

The data indicates that this PC can run Inside at 4K Ultra with a comfortable margin, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions. At 1440p, the 157.1 FPS average supports 144Hz monitors in most scenes. At 1080p, the 218.1 FPS average exceeds 200Hz refresh rates, though the game's genre may not require such high frame rates. All verdicts point to a fully playable experience across the entire resolution and preset matrix.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU divide responsibilities in Inside. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (291.6 FPS) and Ultra (218.1 FPS) is 73.5 FPS, indicating that GPU load increases substantially with preset quality. However, even at Low settings, the frame rate is extraordinarily high, suggesting the CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them at lower presets.

At 2560x1440, the preset spread widens to 106.6 FPS between Low (263.7 FPS) and Ultra (157.1 FPS). This larger gap indicates that the GPU becomes more dominant as resolution increases, since pixel throughput requirements grow. The CPU's role diminishes slightly, as evidenced by the smaller relative drop from Low to Medium (21.9 FPS) compared to the Medium-to-High jump (76.1 FPS).

At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance becomes clearer. The Low-to-Ultra spread is 105.8 FPS, but the High-to-Ultra gap narrows to just 4.5 FPS (104.1 to 99.6). This compression at the top end suggests that Ultra settings are not adding significant GPU load over High at 4K, or that the GPU is approaching a performance ceiling where preset differences shrink. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides ample processing power even at 4K, as evidenced by the still-high 205.4 FPS at Low settings.

The resolution scaling at fixed presets further illuminates component roles. At Ultra, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 61 FPS, and moving from 1440p to 4K costs 57.5 FPS. At Low, the 1080p-to-1440p drop is 27.9 FPS, and the 1440p-to-4K drop is 58.3 FPS. These patterns show that the GPU's workload scales roughly linearly with pixel count, while the CPU maintains consistent frame delivery. The Ryzen 5 5600G's benchmark scores—including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10551 and single-core score of 1409—indicate sufficient processing power for this game's physics and logic, which are not exceptionally demanding.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 3716 tested combinations for Inside, this AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing ranks 1060th. This places it in the upper 28.5% of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The RTX 4070's percentile of 81 among all GPUs contributes significantly to this ranking, while the Ryzen 5 5600G's percentile of 74 among all CPUs is slightly lower but still above average.

The rank of 1060 indicates that 1059 tested combinations delivered higher average performance in Inside, while 2656 combinations performed worse. Given the game's light computational demands relative to modern hardware, the RTX 4070's graphics horsepower is the primary driver of this ranking. Systems with higher-ranked combinations likely feature faster GPUs or more powerful CPUs, though the measured frame rates suggest diminishing returns—the 99.6 FPS at 4K Ultra is already far beyond playable.

The ranking also reflects the CPU's position relative to its nearest rivals. The Ryzen 5 5600G's average benchmark score of 21088 sits within 0.4% of its four closest competitors, meaning the CPU choice has minimal impact on this game's performance. The GPU's nearest rivals show slightly larger deltas, but none exceed 1.3%, so any of these alternative components would produce nearly identical rankings. The combination's 1060th place is therefore more indicative of the GPU tier than the specific CPU model, with the RTX 4070's strong benchmark scores anchoring the system's performance.