Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Inside
Puzzle Platformer 2016

Inside

60%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
282 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
131 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
204 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
96 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
7ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,516
Your CPU 20,468
Graphics Card
Required 27,118
Your GPU 18,093

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 66 100 128
1440p QHD 96 99 162 204
1080p Full HD 131 142 224 282

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 142
1920x1080 Low 282
1920x1080 Medium 224
1920x1080 Ultra 131
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Low 204
2560x1440 Medium 162
2560x1440 Ultra 96
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Low 128
3840x2160 Medium 100
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: Inside on Your System

Can AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER run Inside? The recorded data in our database shows that this combination handles the game with significant headroom across all tested resolutions. Inside is a puzzle platformer with modest graphical demands, and this pairing of a Zen 3 six-core processor with a Turing-based graphics card delivers average frame rates well above the 60 FPS playable threshold in every configuration tested. The benchmark results indicate that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the dominant factor in performance scaling, though the Ryzen 5 5600 provides ample processing headroom to avoid bottlenecking even at high frame rates. The data set includes measurements at three resolutions and four quality presets, offering a complete picture of expected performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination covers 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, each with Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. All recorded values are average FPS figures, with minimum and maximum frame rates not available in the data set. At 1920x1080, the results are exceptionally high across the board. The Low preset averages 282.4 FPS, which is the highest recorded value for this combination. Medium settings produce an average of 224 FPS, High settings reach 141.5 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset still delivers 131.1 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 151.3 FPS, indicating that the graphics settings have a substantial impact on frame rate, but even the heaviest load remains far above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected impact of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 203.9 FPS, a drop of 78.5 FPS compared to the same settings at 1080p. Medium settings average 162.2 FPS, High settings average 98.9 FPS, and Ultra settings average 96.2 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at this resolution is only 2.7 FPS, suggesting that the transition between these two presets carries a relatively small performance cost. The Ultra preset at 1440p remains well above the playable threshold, with a recorded average of 96.2 FPS.

At 3840x2160, which is the most demanding resolution in the data set, the combination still clears the 60 FPS bar with every preset. The Low settings average 128 FPS, Medium settings average 100.3 FPS, and High settings average 65.6 FPS. The Ultra preset produces an average of 62.1 FPS, which is the lowest recorded value across the entire data set but still above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is notable: the High preset drops from 98.9 FPS to 65.6 FPS, a reduction of 33.3 FPS, while Ultra drops from 96.2 FPS to 62.1 FPS, a reduction of 34.1 FPS. This indicates that 4K resolution imposes a significant load on the GPU, but the RTX 2060 SUPER manages to maintain playable frame rates even under the heaviest tested configuration.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database determines the best settings by identifying the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold at each resolution. For this combination, the results are straightforward because every setting at every resolution meets the threshold. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average FPS of 131.1. This is the highest quality preset available in the data set, and the recorded frame rate leaves substantial headroom above the playable threshold, meaning users can run the game at maximum quality without concern for performance dips.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average FPS of 96.2. The performance at this resolution is still far above the 60 FPS threshold, and the gap between Ultra and High is minimal at just 2.7 FPS. Users targeting 1440p can comfortably select the Ultra preset, as the data shows no need to compromise on visual quality to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the best settings remain Ultra, with an average FPS of 62.1. This is the closest the combination comes to the playable threshold, with only 2.1 FPS of headroom above 60 FPS. While the Ultra preset is technically playable at 4K according to the recorded data, the margin is slim. The High preset at this resolution averages 65.6 FPS, offering a slightly larger buffer with a relatively small visual compromise. For users who prioritize stability over maximum quality at 4K, the High preset may be the safer choice, but the data confirms that Ultra is playable at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data shows that the GPU is the primary performance driver for Inside, with the CPU playing a supporting role that becomes less significant as resolution increases. This is evident from the scaling patterns across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, ranging from 131.1 FPS at Ultra to 282.4 FPS at Low. These figures suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to sustain very high frame rates, but the GPU is still the limiting factor when settings are increased. The sharp drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p, a difference of 151.3 FPS, indicates that the graphics load is what drives performance changes, not the processor.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds. The Low preset averages 203.9 FPS, while Ultra averages 96.2 FPS. The reduction in frame rates compared to 1080p is consistent with an increase in GPU load from additional pixels. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, has ample processing power for this game, as evidenced by the extremely high frame rates at lower settings. The six-core, twelve-thread processor with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz is more than sufficient for a puzzle platformer of this scope.

At 3840x2160, the GPU role becomes even more pronounced. The frame rates at 4K are substantially lower than at lower resolutions, with the Ultra preset averaging 62.1 FPS. This is a drop of 34.1 FPS compared to the same preset at 1440p, and a drop of 69 FPS compared to the same preset at 1080p. The scaling between resolutions demonstrates that the RTX 2060 SUPER is handling an increasing pixel workload, while the CPU contribution remains relatively constant. The data suggests that users with this combination should focus on GPU settings when optimizing performance, as the processor is unlikely to be a bottleneck at any resolution or preset tested.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Inside at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average FPS of 62.1 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 282.4, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra?

A: The Ultra preset averages 131.1 FPS at 1920x1080 and 62.1 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 69 FPS.

Q: Are all settings playable at 2560x1440?

A: Yes, all four presets are playable at 2560x1440. The lowest average FPS at this resolution is 96.2, recorded with Ultra settings.

Q: Which component is more important for performance in this game?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver. Frame rates scale significantly with resolution and graphics settings, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom even at high frame rates.

Q: What is the closest the combination comes to the 60 FPS threshold?

A: The closest margin is at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average FPS is 62.1, just 2.1 FPS above the playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, which scores 20454 with a delta of 0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G, which scores 20425 with a delta of 0.2 percent. The AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7713 also appear in the same range, with scores of 20422 and 20363 respectively, both showing deltas of 0.2 and 0.5 percent. These processors would offer similar CPU-level performance in this game, meaning the frame rates would be nearly identical in scenarios where the GPU is the limiting factor.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 980 Ti, which has an average score of 2011 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, though this is a different benchmark suite. The recorded passmark G3D score for the RTX 2060 SUPER is 16462, while the nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, has a score of 18159 with a delta of -0.4 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, showing a delta of -0.5 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373 with a delta of -1.1 percent. The Intel Arc A770M scores 18383, with a delta of -1.6 percent. When paired with the Ryzen 5 5600, swapping to one of these GPUs would yield Frame rates within a few percentage points of the RTX 3 2060 SUPER, with the differences being more noticeable at higher resolutions is key to note that the Ultra preset at 4K might dip below 60 FPS if the GPU is slightly slower than the RTX 2060 SUPER.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2544 out of 3716 tested combos in the database for Inside. This places it in the 68th percentile of tested combinations, indicating that it performs better than the majority of systems tested. The ranking reflects the balance of CPU and GPU performance, with the CPU placing in the 74th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU in the 62nd percentile against all GPUs. The position in the database suggests that this is a capable pairing for a game like Inside, which is not particularly demanding, the high frame rates across all settings and resolutions support this conclusion. While the combo rank is not at the very top of the list, the performance data shows that the performance is more than sufficient to handle the game at maximum settings at any resolution, with the only caveat being that 4K Ultra has a slim margin of 2.1 FPS above the playable threshold. The measured data positions this combination as a reliable option for Inside. The recorded frame rates confirm that the RTX 2060 SUPER, supported by the Ryzen 5 5600, delivers a smooth experience across the board.