Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly capable experience in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. The measured data shows that this pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p, offering frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold, while 4K requires a moderate settings adjustment to maintain smooth gameplay. This analysis breaks down the exact performance metrics, compares the hardware to its closest rivals, and provides a clear verdict on what settings to use for each resolution.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data and the playable threshold of 60 FPS, the optimal configuration for each resolution is the highest preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above that threshold.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium. The average frame rate at this setting is 87 FPS, which provides a comfortable margin above the threshold. While the High preset is also playable, its average of 54 FPS falls below the 60 FPS target, making Medium the clear choice for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset, with an average of 52 FPS, is likewise unsuitable for this target.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the best setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 82 FPS. This is the highest quality preset available, and it maintains a solid framerate well above the 60 FPS line. All other presets at this resolution—High, Medium, and Low—also exceed the threshold, but Ultra offers the best visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 114 FPS. This provides an exceptionally fluid experience with maximum graphical quality. The performance headroom is significant, indicating that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K resolution with maximum settings?*

A: No. The data shows an average of 52 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at this resolution is Medium, which yields an average of 87 FPS.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 82 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, making Ultra settings fully playable at this resolution.

Q: Is the performance at 1080p with Low settings sufficient for competitive play?

A: Yes, the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Low settings is 240 FPS. This is far above the 60 FPS threshold and is high enough for very fast-paced gameplay, should the game require it.

Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Medium to Low at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate increases from 87 FPS on Medium to 108 FPS on Low. This is a significant jump, offering a large performance buffer if needed.

Q: Which resolution provides the most balanced experience between visual quality and performance?

A: The data suggests that 2560x1440 with Ultra settings offers an excellent balance, providing an average of 82 FPS with maximum graphical fidelity. This resolution delivers a substantial improvement in image quality over 1080p while still maintaining a high, smooth frame rate.

Q: Does the system ever experience frame drops below 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: The minimum frame rates are only recorded for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the minimum FPS is 163, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This indicates stable performance with minimal stuttering.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data presents the exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates for each resolution and settings combination, as measured by the benchmark.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: Average 108 FPS.
• Medium: Average 87 FPS, minimum 74 FPS, maximum 100 FPS.
• High: Average 54 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 52 FPS.

At 4K, the performance scales significantly with settings. The jump from Low to Medium results in a 21 FPS drop in the average, while moving from Medium to High causes a steep 33 FPS decline. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal, at only 2 FPS. The minimum frame rate for Medium is 74 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold, but the average for High and Ultra falls below it.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: Average 172 FPS.
• Medium: Average 138 FPS, minimum 117 FPS, maximum 159 FPS.
• High: Average 86 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 82 FPS.

At 1440p, the frame rates are considerably higher. The step from Low to Medium reduces the average by 34 FPS, and the step from Medium to High reduces it by 52 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is a mere 4 FPS. Even the minimum frame rate for Medium at 117 FPS is far above the 60 FPS target, indicating very stable performance across all presets.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: Average 240 FPS.
• Medium: Average 192 FPS, minimum 163 FPS, maximum 221 FPS.
• High: Average 120 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 114 FPS.

At 1080p, the system exhibits exceptional performance. The average frame rate for Low settings hits 240 FPS, while Ultra still manages an average of 114 FPS. The scaling between presets is consistent, with the largest drop occurring between Medium and High (72 FPS). The minimum frame rate at Medium is 163 FPS, which is still more than double the 60 FPS threshold, showcasing the CPU and GPU combination's strength at this resolution.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that this PC configuration is fully capable of running Inside smoothly. The verdict by resolution confirms that the system clears the 60 FPS threshold in all but the most demanding scenarios.

• 3840x2160: The system is playable, but not at maximum quality. The playable settings are Low and Medium. The best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 87 FPS, which provides a good balance of visual fidelity and performance. High and Ultra settings are not recommended as they fall below the 60 FPS target.

• 2560x1440: The system is fully playable at all settings. The playable settings are High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. The best setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 82 FPS. This allows for the highest visual quality with no compromises to smoothness.

• 1920x1080: The system is fully playable at all settings, with exceptional performance. The playable settings are High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. The best setting is Ultra, which achieves an average of 114 FPS. This makes the game extremely fluid and responsive at this resolution.

In summary, for a 1080p or 1440p display, this system can run Inside with all settings maxed out and maintain a high frame rate. For a 4K display, users should select the Medium preset to ensure a smooth experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The hardware components in this system have close performance rivals based on their average benchmark scores.

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has an average benchmark score of 37018. Its nearest rivals are:

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, with an average score of 36945. This is a 0.2% difference, indicating nearly identical CPU performance.
• AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, with an average score of 37093. This is a -0.2% difference, also showing negligible performance delta.
• Intel Core Ultra 5 225, with an average score of 36938. This is a 0.2% difference, meaning these CPUs are effectively tied in performance.
• Intel Core i9-12900T, with an average score of 37112. This is a -0.3% difference, placing it at the top of this group but still within a negligible margin.

The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rivals are:

• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with an average score of 20534. This is a 0.1% difference, suggesting the Arc B570 offers comparable performance to this mobile GPU.
• Intel Arc A750, with an average score of 20582. This is a -0.1% difference, indicating the B570 and A750 are nearly identical in performance.
• NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, with an average score of 20480. This is a 0.4% difference, showing the B570 is slightly faster.
• AMD Radeon R9 M390X, with an average score of 20662. This is a -0.5% difference, meaning the B570 is slightly slower than this older AMD GPU.

For the purposes of running Inside, any of these rival components would be expected to produce very similar frame rates to those measured for the Ryzen 5 5500X3D and Arc B570, given their marginal performance differences.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and Intel Arc B570 places it at rank 2983 out of 3716 tested combinations in our database for this game.

This rank indicates that this configuration sits in the lower-middle portion of all tested systems. While it is not a top-tier performer, its ability to run the game at high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p confirms it is far from being underpowered. The rank is likely influenced by the presence of many high-end enthusiast systems in the database, but the performance data shows that this specific combo is well-suited to deliver a playable and enjoyable experience for a game like Inside, which is not graphically demanding. The high percentile scores of the individual components—85th for the CPU and 65th for the GPU—suggest that the system's ranking is more a reflection of other tested combos being more powerful, rather than a deficiency of this pairing.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data, particularly the scaling between resolutions and presets, reveals how the workload is distributed between the CPU and GPU for Inside.

The game exhibits classic GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions. This is evident in the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 240 FPS at 1080p to 108 FPS at 4K. This halving of performance as pixel count increases by roughly four times points to a significant GPU load. The GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as its rendering throughput limits the frame rate.

However, the CPU's role is not negligible. The Ryzen 5 5500X3D's strong single-thread performance, indicated by a Passmark single-thread score of 2941, ensures that it can feed the GPU efficiently. The fact that at 1080p Low settings the frame rate reaches 240 FPS shows that the CPU is capable of handling a very high number of frames per second without becoming a limiting factor.

The scaling between presets also highlights the GPU's dominance. At 1440p, the drop from Medium to High is 52 FPS, while at 1080p, the same settings change results in a 72 FPS drop. This larger absolute drop at lower resolutions is typical of a GPU bottleneck, as the GPU has more headroom to process additional graphical effects but still sees a significant performance hit.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the defining component. The difference between Low and Medium is 21 FPS, a smaller gap than at lower resolutions because the GPU is already heavily loaded. The minimal difference between High and Ultra (2 FPS) further cements this, indicating that the GPU is saturated with work. The CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame rate floor; the minimum FPS of 74 at 4K Medium suggests the CPU is not causing stutters or dips, even when the GPU is under heavy load. In summary, while the GPU scales the performance with resolution and settings, the CPU provides a stable foundation that prevents it from becoming a bottleneck in this game.