Inside

Under the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers average frame rates well above the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and settings combination for Inside. The lowest recorded average is 98.5 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still leaves a comfortable margin. The strongest result appears at 1080p Low with an average of 242.6 FPS, showing that this combination is heavily overqualified for the game’s demands. The data indicates that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing, as the CPU’s performance percentile (71st) trails the GPU’s (81st), and the frame rates scale predictably with resolution changes.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 242.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the recorded average frame rate is 98.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How much performance difference exists between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 216.9 FPS while Ultra settings average 157.2 FPS. This represents a performance drop of 59.7 FPS, or roughly 27.5% lower frame rate when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the 1920x1080 average is 188.7 FPS, while the 3840x2160 average is 103 FPS. The 4K resolution produces 85.7 FPS fewer on average.

Q: Which resolution shows the smallest gap between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (186.9 FPS) and Ultra (98.5 FPS) is 88.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, the gap is 59.7 FPS, and at 1920x1080, the gap is 57.8 FPS. The smallest absolute difference is at 1080p.

Q: Does this system ever drop below 60 FPS in any recorded configuration?

A: No. The lowest recorded average frame rate across all resolutions and settings is 98.5 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which records an average of 184.8 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it still leaves enormous headroom above the playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also clear the 60 FPS requirement with an average of 157.2 FPS. The frame rate remains high enough that even the most demanding preset does not compromise smoothness.

For 3840x2160, Ultra settings deliver an average of 98.5 FPS. This is the only resolution where the average drops below 100 FPS, but it still stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that all four settings presets at 4K are playable, with High at 103 FPS, Medium at 164.6 FPS, and Low at 186.9 FPS.

Across all three resolutions, the conclusion is consistent: the maximum visual quality preset is always playable. The recorded data shows no scenario where the system falls below 60 FPS, even at the highest settings and largest pixel count.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded measurements reveal that the GPU is the primary performance driver in this pairing. The RTX 4070 sits in the 81st percentile among all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 4600G ranks in the 71st percentile among CPUs. This gap suggests that the graphics card has more relative headroom, and the data supports this interpretation.

Looking at resolution scaling, the frame rates drop as resolution increases, which is typical for GPU-bound workloads. At Low settings, moving from 1920x1080 (242.6 FPS) to 2560x1440 (216.9 FPS) reduces the average by 25.7 FPS, and moving to 3840x2160 (186.9 FPS) reduces it further by 30 FPS. This consistent decline with pixel count indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor.

At Ultra settings, the same pattern appears but with larger absolute drops. From 1080p (184.8 FPS) to 1440p (157.2 FPS) the average falls by 27.6 FPS, and from 1440p to 4K (98.5 FPS) it falls by 58.7 FPS. The steeper decline at higher settings and resolutions is a classic sign of GPU saturation.

The CPU’s role becomes more apparent when comparing settings at a fixed resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 57.8 FPS (242.6 to 184.8), which shows that settings changes have a measurable impact. However, this impact is smaller at 4K, where the Low to Ultra gap is 88.4 FPS (186.9 to 98.5). The larger gap at 4K indicates that the GPU is doing more work per frame, while the CPU has less influence on the final result.

The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, are sufficient for this puzzle platformer. The recorded data shows no scenario where the CPU becomes a bottleneck, as even the lowest frame rate (98.5 FPS at 4K Ultra) remains far above the playability threshold. The GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle the rendering load effectively.

The Verdict

This PC can run Inside at all tested resolutions with maximum settings. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 1920x1080, Ultra settings produce 184.8 FPS average; at 2560x1440, Ultra produces 157.2 FPS; and at 3840x2160, Ultra produces 98.5 FPS. All three exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold by a substantial margin.

The recorded data lists every settings preset as playable at every resolution. This includes Low, Medium, High, and Ultra at 4K, which is the most demanding configuration. The lowest average frame rate in the entire dataset is 98.5 FPS, meaning the system never approaches the 60 FPS boundary.

For a game like Inside, which is a puzzle platformer, the frame rates recorded here are far beyond what is necessary for a smooth experience. The system has enough performance headroom to handle any potential frame time spikes, even though the dataset only provides average FPS values without minimum or maximum measurements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce 242.6 FPS, Medium settings produce 223.7 FPS, High settings produce 188.7 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 184.8 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the largest single step being the drop from Medium to High at 35 FPS.

For 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 216.9 FPS, Medium at 202.4 FPS, High at 162.9 FPS, and Ultra at 157.2 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra narrows to 5.7 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the highest settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 186.9 FPS, Medium at 164.6 FPS, High at 103 FPS, and Ultra at 98.5 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is particularly steep at 61.6 FPS, indicating that the High preset introduces a significant rendering cost at 4K.

All measurements are average FPS values, as the database does not include minimum or maximum frame rate recordings for this game. The data covers 12 total configurations, with four settings presets at each of the three resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 1524th out of 3716 total combos for Inside. This places it in the 59th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 41% of recorded combinations perform better in this specific game.

The rank reflects the overall capability of the pairing, not just the GPU or CPU individually. Given that the GPU sits in the 81st percentile and the CPU in the 71st percentile, the combined rank of 1524 suggests that the system is well balanced but not exceptional for this title. Many higher-ranked combos likely feature newer or more powerful CPUs, as the RTX 4070 is already near the top of the GPU distribution.

The 59th percentile ranking does not indicate any playability concerns. The system clears the 60 FPS threshold at all settings, and the rank is more a measure of relative performance among enthusiast-level hardware. For a puzzle platformer, the ranking is more than sufficient.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE has an average benchmark score of 17482, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 4600G’s 17507. The AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 17614, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17395, which is 0.6% lower, and the Intel Core i3-14100T scores 17648, which is 0.8% higher.

These four CPUs would behave similarly to the Ryzen 5 4600G in terms of overall benchmark performance, with differences under 1% in either direction. For Inside, any of these processors would likely produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with the RTX 4070, since the game does not appear to be CPU-limited.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with an average score of 37628, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4070’s 37648. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, which is 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, which is 1.3% lower.

These GPU alternatives would produce frame rates within roughly 1.3% of the RTX 4070 in synthetic benchmarks. In practical terms for Inside, the performance difference would be minimal, with all of them maintaining well above 60 FPS at every resolution and settings preset. The RTX 4080 Mobile would be the strongest alternative, while the Radeon PRO W6400 would be the weakest, but none would change the playability verdict.