Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Greedfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 76 | 79 | 99 |
| 1440p QHD | 81 | 126 | 137 | 173 |
| 1080p Full HD | 112 | 175 | 194 | 251 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Greedfall on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a clear performance profile in Greedfall, with the data showing a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The benchmark results, drawn from measured FPS data, indicate that this combination provides a smooth experience across most settings, with the CPU's substantial multi-core headroom ensuring it rarely becomes the limiting factor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700KF, based on average benchmark scores, are all within a very tight margin of performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the closest, with a delta of only 0.2%, meaning the two processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X follow closely with deltas of 0.4% and 0.9%, respectively. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is the only rival with a negative delta at -1%, indicating the 14700KF holds a slight edge. In practice, any of these CPUs would yield statistically indistinguishable performance in Greedfall, as the game's demands are unlikely to expose the marginal differences between them.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070's nearest rivals are an eclectic group. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 is the closest match with a 0.1% delta, though this is a data-center part rather than a gaming card. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is within 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 is 1.3% slower. The only rival that outperforms the RTX 4070 is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, which posts a -1.3% delta, indicating the desktop RTX 4070 is slightly slower than the mobile 4080 in aggregate benchmarks. For gaming purposes, the RTX 4070 would behave similarly to a Radeon RX Vega 56, though the latter lacks modern feature support.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is likely CPU-limited at lower presets, as the GPU has ample headroom. The jump from Low to Ultra at this resolution shows a drop from 250.8 FPS to 112.2 FPS, a 55% reduction that is almost entirely attributable to GPU workload. However, the fact that Low preset reaches 250.8 FPS suggests the CPU can feed the GPU far beyond the 60 FPS threshold, meaning the processor is not a bottleneck at any setting here.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take a more prominent role. The scaling from Low (172.7 FPS) to Ultra (81.2 FPS) shows a 53% performance decrease, but the absolute numbers remain high. The CPU's influence diminishes as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint. At 3840x2160, the GPU is definitively the limiting factor. The Ultra preset drops to 48.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold, while Low still achieves 99.4 FPS. This pattern indicates that the i7-14700KF provides sufficient headroom at all resolutions, and the RTX 4070's raw throughput dictates the final frame rate. The data shows no scenario where the CPU prevents the GPU from reaching its potential.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across twelve combinations of resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well. Low settings produce an average of 250.8 FPS, which drops to 194.2 FPS at Medium, 175.4 FPS at High, and 112.2 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 138.6 FPS, showing the significant cost of high-quality effects at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are still strong but show the expected reduction. Low settings deliver 172.7 FPS, Medium drops to 136.5 FPS, High yields 125.8 FPS, and Ultra maintains 81.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 53% reduction, which is consistent with the increased pixel count. At 3840x2160, the performance curve becomes steeper. Low settings produce 99.4 FPS, Medium drops to 79 FPS, High is slightly lower at 76.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48.6 FPS. The close margins between Medium and High at 4K suggest the GPU is becoming saturated, with diminishing returns from higher presets. Notably, the min and max FPS values are not provided, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates.
The Verdict
The data clearly answers whether this PC can run Greedfall: yes, with caveats at the highest resolution. The verdict by resolution shows that at 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the lowest average being 112.2 FPS at Ultra. This comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra averaging 81.2 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold. The system handles 1440p without any issues.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Ultra preset falls to 48.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and therefore not considered playable by the benchmark criteria. However, High, Medium, and Low all remain above 60 FPS, with High averaging 76.1 FPS. This means the system can run Greedfall at 4K, but only if the user is willing to dial back from the highest settings. The recommended best setting at 4K is High, which provides a 76.1 FPS average. For users prioritizing visual fidelity at 4K, the data suggests that Ultra is not viable, but High offers a good balance.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 863 out of 3703 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the top 23% of all tested configurations, which is a strong showing given the game's age and the hardware's capabilities. The rank reflects that while this is not an extreme high-end setup, it outperforms the majority of systems tested. The percentile data for the CPU (94th) and GPU (81st) individually supports this, with the CPU being a top-tier part and the GPU being solidly above average. The combined rank suggests that the system is well-balanced, with the CPU's strength compensating for any GPU limitations at lower resolutions, and the GPU holding its own at higher ones.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Greedfall at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?
A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 112.2, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for 3840x2160?
A: The best setting that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average FPS of 76.1. Ultra settings drop to 48.6 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score that is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, indicating essentially equivalent performance.
Q: Is the RTX 4070 faster than the RTX 4080 Mobile?
A: No, the RTX 4070 is slower by 1.3% based on average benchmark scores, meaning the mobile RTX 4080 has a slight edge in aggregate performance.
Q: What is the average FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 136.5, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How many total combinations were tested for this game?
A: The benchmark database includes 3703 total combinations, with this specific combo ranking 863rd.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 112.2 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still offering a significant margin above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra remains the best setting, with an average of 81.2 FPS. The margin above 60 FPS is smaller but still comfortable.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is not viable, as it drops to 48.6 FPS. The best setting is High, which averages 76.1 FPS. This is the only resolution where the user must compromise on settings to maintain playability. The recommendation is clear: for 4K gaming, choose High; for 1440p and 1080p, Ultra is the optimal choice. The data shows a consistent pattern where the system's performance scales predictably with resolution, and the 60 FPS threshold is easily met at lower resolutions but requires settings adjustments at 4K.