Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Greedfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 54 | 65 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 92 | 103 | 130 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 135 | 151 | 188 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Greedfall on Your System
Intel Core i5-10400F paired with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a robust experience in Greedfall, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The recorded data shows that this combination handles 1080p and 1440p with ease, while 4K requires moderate settings to maintain smooth frame rates. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, component roles, ranking, and optimal settings based solely on database measurements.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces high frame rates across all presets. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 188.0, making it exceptionally fluid. Medium settings yield 151.2 FPS on average, while High settings deliver 135.4 FPS. Even at Ultra, which is the most demanding preset, the average FPS remains strong at 89.1. No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded in the database, so the analysis relies on average FPS figures.
At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains well above the 60 FPS threshold for every preset. Low settings average 129.7 FPS, Medium averages 102.8 FPS, and High averages 92.2 FPS. Ultra settings still clear the playable threshold with an average of 61.4 FPS, though this is noticeably lower than the other presets. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction in frame rates, with Ultra dropping from 89.1 to 61.4 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the performance gap becomes more pronounced. Low settings average 75.9 FPS, which is playable but not as high as lower resolutions. Medium settings average 64.7 FPS, still above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings fall to 53.5 FPS, which is below playable levels. Ultra settings produce an average of 36.6 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The database records no minimum or maximum FPS values, so the verdict relies on average FPS only.
The data indicates a clear pattern: the higher the resolution, the more the GPU is stressed, leading to lower average FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial, with Ultra delivering less than half the average FPS of Low. At 1080p, the difference is also significant but less extreme, with Ultra producing about 47% of Low's average FPS.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded FPS scaling across resolutions reveals which component limits performance. At 1920x1080, the RTX 5060 is likely the primary driver, but the Intel Core i5-10400F can keep up with the GPU's output. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p reduces average FPS from 188.0 to 89.1, a 52.6% drop, indicating that GPU load increases substantially with preset quality. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these settings.
At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes more stressed, as shown by the average FPS dropping across all presets compared to 1080p. The CPU's role diminishes slightly, but the i5-10400F still provides sufficient throughput. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 61.4 FPS, which is close to the playable threshold, suggesting that the GPU is nearing its limit at this resolution with maximum settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The average FPS drops sharply, with High settings at 53.5 FPS and Ultra at 36.6 FPS. The CPU's performance is less relevant here, as the RTX 5060 cannot maintain high frame rates at 4K regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The i5-10400F's six cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this game, as the data shows no CPU-related stutters or inconsistencies, but the GPU limits the overall experience.
The scaling between resolutions indicates that the RTX 5060 is the dominant factor at 1440p and 4K, while the i5-10400F is adequate at all resolutions. The database shows that lowering settings at 4K from High to Medium improves average FPS from 53.5 to 64.7, a 21% gain, which is more significant than the gain from Low to Medium at 1080p, where FPS rises from 188.0 to 151.2. This confirms that GPU load scales heavily with resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database, this specific combination of Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1813 out of 3703 tested combos for Greedfall. This puts it in the 49th percentile, meaning it performs slightly better than half of all tested configurations. The rank reflects the balance between CPU and GPU, and the data shows that this combo is neither top-tier nor entry-level.
The CPU's individual benchmark scores contribute to this ranking. The i5-10400F has a percentile of 68 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 14185. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E (avg score 14163, delta 0.2%), Intel Core 7 160UL (avg score 14232, delta -0.3%), AMD EPYC 7552 (avg score 14115, delta 0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (avg score 14277, delta -0.6%). These scores are all within 0.6% of each other, indicating that the CPU's raw performance is comparable to these alternatives.
The GPU's percentile is 72 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M (avg score 26401, delta -0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (avg score 26421, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (avg score 26553, delta -0.8%), and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (avg score 26011, delta 1.2%). These delta values are small, suggesting that the RTX 5060's performance is closely matched by these GPUs.
The combo's rank of 1813 out of 3703 suggests that it sits in the middle of the pack. The CPU and GPU are both mid-range parts, so this ranking is expected. The data indicates that this combo will handle most games at 1080p and 1440p, but it may struggle at 4K with high settings.
The Verdict
Based on the recorded data, this PC can run Greedfall at multiple resolutions and presets, but the playable threshold of 60 FPS is not always met. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 89.1 FPS, which is well above the threshold. This resolution offers the best experience, with even the most demanding settings providing smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, including Ultra at 61.4 FPS. This is just above the 60 FPS threshold, so players can enjoy maximum visual quality with a minor risk of occasional dips, though the average remains acceptable. High settings at 92.2 FPS provide more headroom.
At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium settings are playable, with averages of 75.9 FPS and 64.7 FPS, respectively. High settings at 53.5 FPS and Ultra at 36.6 FPS fall below the threshold. The verdict by resolution confirms that 4K gaming requires reducing settings to Medium for a stable experience.
The best settings per resolution are Medium at 4K (64.7 FPS), Ultra at 1440p (61.4 FPS), and Ultra at 1080p (89.1 FPS). These settings provide the highest visual fidelity while maintaining an average FPS above 60.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the database are all within 0.6% of the i5-10400F's average benchmark score. The Intel Xeon 6756E (delta 0.2%) and AMD EPYC 7552 (delta 0.5%) are marginally faster, while the Intel Core 7 160UL (delta -0.3%) and AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (delta -0.6%) are slightly slower. These CPUs would produce nearly identical gameplay performance in Greedfall, as the differences are negligible.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show similar performance levels. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (delta 1.2%) is slightly faster, while the AMD Radeon 860M (delta -0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (delta -0.3%), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (delta -0.8%) are marginally slower. These GPUs would result in comparable FPS values in Greedfall, with the RX 6750 XT offering a small advantage and the others being nearly identical.
Combining these alternatives, a setup with the Intel Core 7 160UL and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT would likely perform similarly to the tested combo, with the GPU potentially providing a slight boost. Conversely, pairing the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 would be a close match, though the MX550's lower score might lead to marginally lower FPS at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Greedfall at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the recorded data shows an average FPS of 89.1 at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average FPS of 61.4, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. High settings at 92.2 FPS offer more headroom.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this combo?
A: Yes, but only with Low (75.9 FPS) or Medium (64.7 FPS) settings. High settings at 53.5 FPS and Ultra at 36.6 FPS fall below the playable threshold.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?
A: It ranks 1813 out of 3703 combos, placing it in the middle of the database. The CPU and GPU both have mid-range benchmark scores.
Q: What GPU is closest in performance to the RTX 5060?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average score of 26011, which is 1.2% lower, while the AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, 0.3% higher. These are the nearest rivals in the database.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?
A: The data suggests no significant bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, as lowering settings improves FPS more than at lower resolutions. The CPU's scores are sufficient for this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average FPS of 64.7. Low settings at 75.9 FPS are also playable, but Medium provides better visual quality. High and Ultra settings are not recommended due to average FPS below 60.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings achieve an average FPS of 61.4, making it the best choice for maximum visual fidelity. This is just above the threshold, so players may prefer High settings at 92.2 FPS for more consistent performance.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver an average FPS of 89.1, which is the highest preset available. This provides the best visual experience without sacrificing playability, as the average FPS remains well above 60. For players seeking even higher frame rates, High settings at 135.4 FPS or Medium at 151.2 FPS are viable options.