Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Greedfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 44 | 48 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 72 | 77 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 103 | 118 | 147 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Greedfall on Your System
Greedfall on an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with an Intel Arc B580 is a comfortable experience at 1080p and 1440p, and a marginal one at 4K. The measured data shows every preset at 1920x1080 clearing the 60 FPS threshold, three of four presets doing so at 2560x1440, and only Low settings scraping past the line at 3840x2160. This is a GPU-bound pairing for a 2019 action RPG: the 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 processor sits in the 91st percentile of all tested CPUs, while the Battlemage GPU occupies the 68th percentile — and the frame-rate scaling across resolutions confirms the Arc B580 is the deciding factor at every step up in pixel count.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings average 146.8 FPS, Medium rises to a still-high 117.9 FPS, and High holds 102.6 FPS. Even Ultra — the heaviest preset tested — averages 68.3 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold with room to spare. That means a 1080p player never has to compromise on visual fidelity with this hardware.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates step down in a predictable pattern but remain playable across most of the settings range. Low averages 100.5 FPS, Medium 77.1 FPS, and High 71.9 FPS — all above 60. Ultra is the lone exception at 43.5 FPS average, a 36% drop from the High result and well below the threshold. The practical takeaway: 1440p High is the sweet spot, sitting comfortably above 60 FPS while retaining near-maximum detail.
At 3840x2160, the Arc B580 runs out of headroom. Low manages 60.9 FPS — a bare pass over the threshold — while Medium falls to 47.8 FPS, High to 43.5 FPS, and Ultra to 26.1 FPS. The gap between 4K Low and 4K Ultra is dramatic: frame rates fall by more than half when moving from the lightest to the heaviest preset. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not captured for any configuration, so the averages above represent the full extent of the measured data for this pairing.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 9 5950X + Arc B580 run Greedfall at 1080p?
A: Yes, at every preset. Low averages 146.8 FPS, Medium 117.9 FPS, High 102.6 FPS, and even Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold at 68.3 FPS average.
Q: What is the best-looking setting for 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: High. It averages 71.9 FPS at 2560x1440, the highest-detail preset that stays above the playable threshold. Ultra at 1440p averages only 43.5 FPS.
Q: Is 4K playable at all?
A: Barely. Only the Low preset clears 60 FPS at 3840x2160, averaging 60.9 FPS. Medium (47.8), High (43.5), and Ultra (26.1) all fall short.
Q: Which component limits performance in this game?
A: The GPU. Frame rates drop sharply as resolution rises — 1080p Ultra averages 68.3 FPS versus 26.1 FPS at 4K Ultra — while the 5950X sits in the 91st percentile of all tested CPUs, far above the Arc B580's 68th-percentile standing among GPUs.
Q: How does this pairing rank against other tested combinations?
A: Rank 2829 out of 3703 tested combos in Greedfall, which places it in the upper portion of the database for this specific title.
Q: What CPU is the 5950X comparable to?
A: Its nearest rivals by average benchmark score are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (-0.2%), AMD EPYC 8124P (-0.3%), Intel Core i9-13900F (+0.4%), and Intel Core i7-14700 (-0.7%) — all effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data tells an unambiguous story: Greedfall on this combo is GPU-limited at every resolution above 1080p. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 cuts frame rates by roughly 30% at every preset — Low drops from 146.8 to 100.5 FPS, Medium from 117.9 to 77.1, High from 102.6 to 71.9, and Ultra from 68.3 to 43.5. Doubling resolution again to 3840x2160 costs another 39-40% across the board. That consistent, resolution-driven degradation is the signature of a graphics bottleneck, not a processor one.
The 5950X simply has nothing to prove here. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017, a single-core score of 1614, and a Passmark multithread score of 45424, it brings far more compute than a 2019 action RPG can use. Even its 3DMark single-thread score of 944 and two-thread score of 1856 indicate that lightly threaded game logic — the typical load pattern for this genre — is well covered. A faster CPU would not move these numbers; a faster GPU clearly would.
One structural note: the Arc B580 connects over a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the 5950X offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, so the platform supplies the bandwidth the card requires without a mismatch in interface generation.
The Verdict
Yes — this PC runs Greedfall, with clear resolution-dependent caveats.
At 1920x1080, the verdict is a clean sweep: all four tested presets are playable, and even Ultra averages 68.3 FPS. A 1080p player should simply max the settings and play.
At 2560x1440, Low, Medium, and High all clear 60 FPS, with High — the best playable preset — averaging 71.9 FPS. Ultra at 43.5 FPS average is the only setting that fails the threshold, so 1440p players should stop one notch below maximum detail.
At 3840x2160, the verdict narrows to a single option: Low settings at 60.9 FPS average. That is technically playable but leaves no margin, and any heavier preset drops into the forties or below — Ultra bottoms out at 26.1 FPS. 4K is feasible, not enjoyable at higher detail.
Similar Performance Alternatives
On the CPU side, the 5950X's nearest rivals are statistically indistinguishable from it, so any of them would behave the same in this game. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX averages 0.2% higher, the AMD EPYC 8124P averages 0.3% higher, the Intel Core i9-13900F averages 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core i7-14700 averages 0.7% higher. Deltas that small fall within run-to-run variance, and since Greedfall is GPU-bound on this combo, CPU substitution at this performance tier would leave the measured frame rates effectively untouched.
On the GPU side, the Arc B580's rivals offer more meaningful swap options. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP averages 0.2% higher, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 averages 0.6% lower, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 averages 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA P106-100 averages 1% higher in aggregate benchmark scoring. Given that the B580's average score of 23021 lands within a percentage point of all four, a system built around any of these GPUs would be expected to produce Greedfall frame rates in the same neighborhood at each resolution and preset — meaning the same 1080p Ultra comfort, the same 1440p High ceiling, and the same 4K struggles documented above.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the Greedfall results database, the Ryzen 9 5950X + Arc B580 pairing ranks 2829 out of 3703 tested combinations. That placement reflects the asymmetry at the heart of this build: the CPU component is elite — 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947 — while the GPU component is mid-pack at the 68th percentile with an average score of 23021. The combo's rank therefore tracks the graphics card, and that is exactly what the per-resolution data shows. The ranking also frames the upgrade path: because the 5950X leaves ample CPU headroom, moving up the GPU chart is the single change that would lift both the combo's rank and its 4K results, while the processor would remain a non-factor either way.