Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
371 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
156 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
248 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
105 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.4ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 93,785
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 86 110 141
1440p QHD 105 151 193 248
1080p Full HD 156 225 287 371

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 225
1920x1080 Low 371
1920x1080 Medium 287
1920x1080 Ultra 156
2560x1440 High 151
2560x1440 Low 248
2560x1440 Medium 193
2560x1440 Ultra 105
3840x2160 High 86
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 110
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

This PC configuration, pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, delivers a flawless performance envelope for Evolve, clearing the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. The data indicates that this combo is not merely capable but overwhelmingly dominant, allowing for maximum visual fidelity at 4K and exceptionally high frame rates at lower resolutions. Benchmark results position this pairing in the 98th percentile of all tested combos, underscoring its elite status for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which achieves a precise average of 60 FPS. This is the ceiling for this combination at 4K, but it represents the maximum possible visual quality, making it the definitive choice for players prioritizing image fidelity. The data shows a clear step-down in performance for lower presets, with High averaging 86 FPS and Medium hitting 110 FPS, but the Ultra preset’s exact 60 FPS average means it is the optimal target for a locked experience at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best settings are again Ultra, but with far more headroom, producing an average of 105 FPS. This resolution strikes the ideal balance, allowing the full Ultra preset to run well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The jump from 4K to 1440p yields a 75% performance increase at Ultra settings, demonstrating that this configuration is heavily overqualified for standard high-refresh-rate gaming at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best settings are unsurprisingly Ultra, delivering a commanding average of 156 FPS. This frame rate is nearly triple the playability threshold, ensuring maximum smoothness on high-refresh-rate displays. The performance scaling at 1080p is exceptional, with even the Low preset reaching 371 FPS, but the Ultra preset’s 156 FPS average remains the recommended choice for the best balance of visual quality and speed.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear shift in workload balance. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high—225 FPS on High and 371 FPS on Low—indicating that the GPU is not the primary constraint, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is effectively feeding the RTX 4090 with ample data. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 215 FPS, a 58% reduction, which points to the GPU becoming more involved as settings increase, but the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 5.50 GHz boost clock, ensures no bottleneck at these elevated frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The average FPS drops from 248 at Low to 105 at Ultra, a 58% decrease, which is a similar relative scaling to 1080p. However, the absolute frame rates are lower, confirming that the RTX 4090’s rendering workload is the limiting factor as pixel count increases. The CPU still holds up its end, as the 164 FPS minimum at Medium settings shows there is no stability collapse, but the GPU is clearly the dominant determinant of performance at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is unquestionably the bottleneck. The Ultra preset’s 60 FPS average is exactly at the threshold, while the Low preset reaches 141 FPS. This 81 FPS spread illustrates how heavily the 4K resolution taxes the RTX 4090’s 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 82.58 TFLOPS of compute power. The CPU’s role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate is dictated by the GPU’s ability to fill pixels, with the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus providing sufficient headroom to avoid any CPU-side limitations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this configuration in Evolve is 98 out of 3700 tested combinations, placing it in the top 2.7% of all systems evaluated. This high ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows the system exceeding 60 FPS at all settings and resolutions. The rank reflects the synergy between the 24-core, 24-thread processor and the flagship GeForce 40-series GPU, which together produce a result that is superior to the vast majority of alternatives.

This percentile placement is particularly notable because it is achieved without any compromises. While other high-end systems may match the 4K Ultra performance, the combination’s strength at 1080p and 1440p, where it maintains triple-digit frame rates, solidifies its position. The data suggests that for Evolve specifically, this pairing is near the apex of what is possible, with only a tiny fraction of exotic or newer configurations potentially outperforming it.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is closely matched by several server-grade processors in general benchmark scores. The Intel Xeon 6520P has an identical average benchmark score of 93786, representing a 0% delta, meaning users would see virtually the same CPU-bound performance in Evolve. The AMD EPYC 4564P is 1.5% slower in average score, while the AMD EPYC 9175F is 1.9% slower and the AMD EPYC 4565P is 2.1% slower. These minor deltas in synthetic benchmarks suggest that any of these CPUs would provide a nearly indistinguishable experience in terms of feeding the RTX 4090, though the gaming-specific behavior could vary slightly due to architecture differences.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4090’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (2.5% slower), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (2.9% faster). While these cards show similar aggregate scores, it is critical to note that these are professional workstation GPUs, not gaming-focused hardware. In practice, their gaming performance in Evolve would likely diverge significantly from the RTX 4090, which is designed with 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores for gaming workloads. The benchmark scores may be comparable, but the measured FPS for this game would heavily favor the RTX 4090 due to its driver optimization and gaming-specific architecture.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are uniformly high across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 371 FPS, while Medium averages 287 FPS with a minimum of 244 FPS and a maximum of 330 FPS. The High preset averages 225 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 156 FPS. All presets far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold, with even the most demanding setting maintaining a frame rate that is well suited for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains robust. The Low preset averages 248 FPS, while Medium averages 193 FPS with a minimum of 164 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS. The High preset delivers an average of 151 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 105 FPS. The minimum FPS of 164 at Medium settings is particularly reassuring, indicating that frame pacing is stable even under load.

At 3840x2160, the data shows the first signs of significant GPU strain. The Low preset averages 141 FPS, and Medium averages 110 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS. The High preset averages 86 FPS, while the Ultra preset exactly hits the 60 FPS average threshold. The lack of min/max data for most 4K presets means we only have the average, but the Ultra result at exactly 60 FPS suggests a consistent, if not headroom-rich, experience.

The Verdict

The verdict is unequivocal: this PC can run Evolve at every resolution and preset combination tested. The data confirms that the 3840x2160 resolution is playable at all settings, with the best playable setting being Ultra at an average of 60 FPS. This means users can experience the game at maximum visual quality in 4K without dropping below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable at all settings, with the best option being Ultra at 105 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1920x1080, the system is also playable at all settings, with Ultra achieving 156 FPS, which is ideal for esports-level responsiveness. The verdict across all resolutions is that this configuration is overqualified for Evolve, delivering a smooth and visually stunning experience without requiring any compromise on settings. The only scenario that approaches the limit is 4K Ultra, but it still meets the minimum performance bar exactly, ensuring a fully playable experience.