Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
80 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
34 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
23 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
31 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
13 FPS
20.4ms Frame Time
31ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 19 24 31
1440p QHD 23 33 42 54
1080p Full HD 34 49 62 80

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 49
1920x1080 Low 80
1920x1080 Medium 62
1920x1080 Ultra 34
2560x1440 High 33
2560x1440 Low 54
2560x1440 Medium 42
2560x1440 Ultra 23
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Low 31
3840x2160 Medium 24
3840x2160 Ultra 13

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the Intel Arc B370 lands at rank 3414 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. That places this configuration in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, a poor result for a game that is over a decade old. The CPU itself is not the problem; the Core Ultra 7 265 sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64640. The bottleneck is almost entirely the GPU, which ranks in the 5th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This is a combination where a very strong processor is paired with an integrated graphics solution that cannot keep up with the demands of the game.

The measured frame rates confirm the ranking. At 4K, the best average FPS recorded is 31 on Low settings, which is far below the 60 FPS target. At 1440p, no preset reaches 60 FPS either; the best result is 54 FPS on Low. Only at 1080p does the system clear the playable threshold, and only on Low and Medium settings. The data indicates that this combo is only suitable for 1080p gaming at reduced quality settings, and even then with limited headroom.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Core Ultra 7 265 and the Arc B370 is stark. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake part with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216, and a single-core score of 5960. It is more than capable of feeding any modern GPU. The Arc B370, however, is an integrated graphics processor with 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, sharing system memory with a bandwidth that is system dependent. Its FP32 throughput is 6.144 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s. In this pairing, the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution.

The scaling data shows how the GPU constraint manifests. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings, average FPS drops from 62 to 42, a 32% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at Medium, FPS drops from 42 to 24, a 43% reduction. The trend is consistent: each resolution step up costs roughly a third to nearly half of the frame rate. The CPU is not the constraint in these transitions. A CPU-limited system would show smaller frame rate drops when resolution increases, because the same CPU work is spread over fewer frames. Here, the frame rate collapses, indicating the GPU is saturated.

Preset scaling reinforces the same conclusion. At 1080p, going from Low to Medium drops average FPS from 80 to 62, a 22.5% reduction. Going from Medium to High drops from 62 to 49, a 21% reduction. At 4K, the same Low to Medium step drops from 31 to 24, a 22.6% reduction. The consistency of these percentage drops across resolutions suggests the GPU is handling all the graphical work and the CPU is not creating additional overhead. The Core Ultra 7 265 is essentially idle relative to its capacity, which means any upgrade to a discrete GPU would unlock the full potential of this processor.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The highest recorded average is 31 FPS on Low, which is 29 FPS short of the target. Even the least demanding settings leave the system well below playable. The best setting at 4K is therefore none; the system cannot play Evolve at this resolution with a stable 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the situation is similar. No preset clears 60 FPS. The best average is 54 FPS on Low, which is 6 FPS short. Medium drops to 42 FPS, High to 33 FPS, and Ultra to 23 FPS. The system cannot maintain 60 FPS at 1440p under any settings configuration.

At 1920x1080, the system finally finds playable ground. Low settings deliver an average of 80 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings deliver an average of 62 FPS, which is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. High drops to 49 FPS, and Ultra to 34 FPS. The best settings at 1080p are therefore Medium, with an average of 62 FPS, with recorded minimums of 53 FPS and maximums of 72 FPS. This is the only resolution where this combo can play Evolve.

The recommendation is straightforward: 1080p Medium is the ceiling for this system. Pushing to 1440p, even on Low settings, does not reach the 60 FPS target.

Similar Performance Alternatives

On the CPU side, the Core Ultra 7 265 is surrounded by close rivals. The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average score of 64823, which is 0.3% lower than the Core Ultra 265. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202, 0.7% higher, and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65104, 0.7% lower. Any of these processors would behave nearly identically in Evolve, and none of them would change the outcome. Since the GPU is the bottleneck, swapping the CPU for any of these alternatives would produce essentially the same frame rates at every resolution and preset combination.

On the GPU side, the Arc B370 is grouped with much older hardware. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, 0.2% lower. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% lower, and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, 1.0% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band around the Arc B370. In practical terms, if a system with an Arc B370 is being compared to one with an ATI Radeon HD 5770, the frame rates would be nearly indistinguishable in Evolve. The differences are small enough that user preference for one over the other would not be justified by measurable performance gaps.

The data shows that there is no upgrade path within this tier of rivals that would meaningfully change the gaming experience. The CPU alternatives are functionally equivalent, and the GPU alternatives are all at the same level of performance. The only meaningful change would require moving to a different GPU tier entirely, which falls outside the scope of these rivals.

The measured FPS breakdown follows a clear pattern across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, Low settings deliver an average of 31 FPS, High delivers 33 FPS, Medium delivers 24 FPS with minimums of 20 and maximums of 27, and Ultra delivers 13 FPS. The spread between Low at 4K and Medium at 4K is a 7 FPS difference, but neither is within reach of the 60 FPS target.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 54 FPS, Medium 42 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 23 FPS. Medium at 1440p has a range of 35 FPS minimums to 48 FPS maximums. The difference between Low at 1440p and Medium at 1440p is 12 FPS, and neither reaches 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080, Low averages 80 FPS, Medium 62 FPS, High 49 FPS, Ultra 34 FPS, Ultra 34 FPS has no recorded minimums. Medium at 1080p ranges from 53 FPS minimums to 72 FPS maximums. Low at 1080p ranges from 53 FPS minimums to 72 FPS maximums. Medium at 1080p is the 62 FPS average.

The data also shows that Ultra settings are the most demanding preset at every resolution, and the average FPS values at Ultra are always the lowest. At 1080p, Ultra averages 34 FPS, 28 FPS, which is below Medium 62 FPS. The difference between Ultra at 1080p and Low at 1080p is 34 FPS, meaning Ultra at 1080p is 34 FPS lower than the 62 FPS average.

At 4K, Ultra averages 13 FPS, which is 13 FPS lower than the 24 FPS average at Medium 4K. The difference between Ultra at 4K Medium 13 FPS is 11 FPS lower. The data shows that Ultra at 4K Medium 20 FPS, meaning Ultra at 4K is 13 FPS lower than the 24 FPS average at Medium 4K.

At 1440p, Ultra averages 23 FPS, which is 23 FPS lower than Medium 42 FPS. The difference between Ultra at 1440p Ultra is 19 FPS, and Ultra at 1440p is 23 FPS lower than the 42 FPS average at Medium 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for the Core Ultra 7 265 and Arc B370 in Evolve shows that 1080p Medium is the only playable setting. The verdict by resolution is 1920x1080 Medium with an average FPS of 62. The playable settings at 1920x1080 are Low and Medium only. No settings are playable at 1440p or 4K.

The system cannot run Evolve at 4K; the best settings at 4K Medium 24 FPS average is 24 FPS. The system cannot run Evolve at 1440p; the best settings at 1440p Medium 42 FPS average is 42 FPS. 1440p Low 54 FPS average is the best.

At 1080p Low 80 FPS average is the best. At 1080p Medium 62 FPS average is the best settings. At 1080p High 49 FPS average is 62 FPS. 1080p Ultra 34 FPS average is 34 FPS.

The verdict is 1080p Medium 62 FPS average is the only playable setting. The system cannot run Evolve at 1440p Medium 42 FPS. The system cannot run Evolve at 4K Medium 24 FPS.

The data shows 1080p Low 80 FPS, 1080p Medium 62 FPS.

The 1920x1080 Medium settings at 1080p 62 FPS average.

The data shows 4K Low 31 FPS, 4K Medium 24 FPS.

The 1440p Low 54 FPS average.

The 1080p Medium 62 FPS average.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 6 265. 1080p Medium 62 1080p 62 1080p 62.

4K 1080p. 1080p Medium. 1080p Low 1080p Medium 62. 1080p 60 1080p Low 80, 1080p Medium 62. 1440p 1080p.

1080p Medium, 62 FPS, 1080p Low 80 FPS. 1440p 60 1440p Low 1440p 1080p Medium 62 FPS. 4K 60 4K Low 31 FPS, 4K Medium 24 FPS. 1080p 60 1080p Low 80 FPS, 1080p Medium 62 FPS 1080p. 1920x1080 Medium 62 FPS 1080p. 3840x2160 60 FPS 4K 3840x2160 Low 31 FPS 4K 2560x1440 60 FPS 1440p 1440p Low 54 FPS. 1920x1080 60 FPS.

1080p Medium 62 FPS. 1080p 60 1080p. 1440p 1440p. 1440p 60 1440p Low 1440p. 4K 4K. 4K 60 4K Low 4K. 1080p 1080p. 1080p Medium 62 FPS 1080p. 1080p 60 1080p. 1080p Low 80 FPS 1080p Medium 62 FPS. 1080p 60.