Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
379 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
160 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
254 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
107 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
4.3ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 46,062
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 88 112 145
1440p QHD 107 155 197 254
1080p Full HD 160 231 294 379

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 231
1920x1080 Low 379
1920x1080 Medium 294
1920x1080 Ultra 160
2560x1440 High 155
2560x1440 Low 254
2560x1440 Medium 197
2560x1440 Ultra 107
3840x2160 High 88
3840x2160 Low 145
3840x2160 Medium 112
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a decisive performance envelope for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. The measured data shows that this combination does not merely clear the 60 FPS playable threshold; it demolishes it at every tested resolution and preset, with the only sub-100 FPS average occurring at 4K Ultra. The benchmark results indicate a system with massive overhead, positioning the RTX 5090 as the primary driver of frame rates, while the Core Ultra 5 235 provides sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecking even at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The raw FPS data for this combo reveals a clear hierarchy of performance scaling with resolution and graphical preset. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across the board. The Low preset yields an average of 379 FPS, which is the highest measured average in the entire dataset. Stepping up to Medium, the average drops to 294 FPS, with a minimum of 250 and a maximum of 338. High settings still produce a commanding 231 FPS average. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p delivers a 160 FPS average, leaving massive headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains stellar but begins to show the expected scaling. The Low preset is still incredibly fast at 254 FPS average. Medium settings produce a 197 FPS average, with a recorded range between 168 and 227 FPS. High settings maintain a 155 FPS average, and Ultra settings drop to 107 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1440p, the system is still heavily GPU-bound at higher presets, but the overall experience is smooth and fluid.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the data shows the most significant impact of resolution scaling. The Low preset still manages a highly playable 145 FPS average. Medium settings produce a 112 FPS average, with a minimum of 95 and a maximum of 129 FPS. High settings achieve an 88 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the most demanding configuration tested, and it still clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 61 FPS, though this is the only data point that comes close to the playable limit. Across all resolutions, the gap between Low and Ultra presets is substantial—roughly 219 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 84 FPS at 4K—highlighting the heavy load that Ultra settings place on the GPU.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for how other hardware might behave in this configuration. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 46062. Its closest competitors in the database are remarkably close in aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is virtually identical, with an average score of 46030 and a delta of just 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i9-13900HX is also a near-match, scoring 46098 and representing a -0.1 percent delta. Two AMD EPYC server chips, the 4364P and 7303, score 45970 and 45960 respectively, with deltas of 0.2 percent. For gaming, this means that swapping the Core Ultra 5 235 for any of these rivals would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Evolve, as the CPU is not the limiting factor in this setup.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a powerhouse, ranking in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 79842. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which scores 79605 (a 0.3 percent delta), and the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, scoring 79396 (0.6 percent delta). The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT trails slightly at 78940, representing a 1.1 percent delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X actually scores higher at 80959, giving it a -1.4 percent delta. In practical terms for Evolve, a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similar-tier CPU would likely fall within a few percentage points of the measured FPS, though the RTX 5090's massive 32 GB memory pool and unique architecture may offer different behavior in other titles.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data clarifies the division of labor between the Core Ultra 5 235 and the RTX 5090 across the tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The jump from Low to Ultra settings at this resolution cuts the average frame rate by more than half (379 to 160 FPS), which is a classic sign of GPU-bound rendering. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these high frame rates, but the graphical workload is the primary constraint. The Core Ultra 5 235's 14 cores and 14 threads, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, are sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at the 379 FPS Low preset figure.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The frame rates are lower at every preset compared to 1080p, but the relative scaling between presets is similar. The GPU's workload increases with resolution, but the CPU's role remains secondary. The data shows a 147 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p, indicating that the GPU is still the main performance driver. The RTX 5090's 21,760 shading units and 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth are being utilized heavily, while the CPU continues to operate well within its capabilities.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's dominance becomes even more pronounced. The 4K Ultra preset, delivering 61 FPS average, represents the maximum strain on the GPU. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 84 FPS, which is a smaller absolute gap than at lower resolutions, but the overall frame rates are much lower. This suggests that at 4K, the system is almost entirely GPU-limited, with the CPU's role diminishing further. The scaling between resolutions at the same preset (e.g., High settings from 231 FPS at 1080p to 155 FPS at 1440p to 88 FPS at 4K) shows a consistent reduction that aligns with the increase in pixel count, confirming that the RTX 5090 is the component that determines the playable experience in Evolve.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Evolve, and it does so with exceptional headroom. The verdict data confirms that all four tested settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at every resolution, with the playable threshold set at 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, delivering a 160 FPS average, which is more than double the threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings achieve a 107 FPS average, providing a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate QHD monitors. At 3840x2160, Ultra settings still clear the bar with a 61 FPS average, though this is the only configuration that approaches the limit. For gamers who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 4K yields 145 FPS, and the Medium preset offers a balanced 112 FPS average with a minimum of 95 FPS. The data shows no scenario in this test matrix where the system falls below 60 FPS, making it a definitive "yes" for running Evolve at maximum settings across all standard resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Evolve?

A: The highest measured average is 379 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system handle Evolve at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its nearest CPU rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062, which is within 0.2 percent of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098), AMD EPYC 4364P (45970), and AMD EPYC 7303 (45960).

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this system?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 95, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 or the Core Ultra 5 235 the main bottleneck in Evolve?

A: The data indicates the RTX 5090 is the primary performance driver, as the frame rate drops significantly with increased resolution and preset quality, while the CPU's performance remains sufficient across all tests.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Evolve?

A: It ranks 51st out of 3700 tested combinations, placing it in the top 1.4 percent of all configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination holds a strong position in the database for Evolve, ranking 51st out of 3700 tested combos. This places it in the upper echelon of systems, with 3649 other configurations producing lower measured performance. The rank reflects the synergy between a high-percentile CPU (89th) and a high-percentile GPU (92nd), resulting in frame rates that are near the top of the chart. While the GPU's nearest rivals—the Tesla P100 variants and Radeon RX 6850M XT—show similar aggregate benchmark scores, none of those pairings are likely to match the RTX 5090's specific characteristics in this game. The data confirms that this is a top-tier setup for Evolve, capable of delivering an exceptionally smooth experience at any resolution, and its rank of 51 out of 3700 underscores that only a small fraction of tested systems can outperform it.