Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
80 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
34 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
54 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
23 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
31 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
13 FPS
20.4ms Frame Time
31ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 46,062
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 1,184

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 19 24 31
1440p QHD 23 33 42 54
1080p Full HD 34 49 62 80

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 49
1920x1080 Low 80
1920x1080 Medium 62
1920x1080 Ultra 34
2560x1440 High 33
2560x1440 Low 54
2560x1440 Medium 42
2560x1440 Ultra 23
3840x2160 High 19
3840x2160 Low 31
3840x2160 Medium 24
3840x2160 Ultra 13

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and Intel Arc B370 pairing presents a striking contrast: a processor that sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, paired with a graphics solution that falls into the 5th percentile of all GPUs. In Evolve, the recorded measurements confirm that this imbalance dictates the playable experience. The system can achieve a smooth 60 FPS only at 1080p with reduced settings, while higher resolutions remain out of reach. The data paints a clear picture of a CPU that is more than capable, held back by a GPU that struggles to keep pace.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the recorded average frame rates are consistently low. Low settings yield 31 FPS, Medium drops to 24 FPS with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 27, High manages 19 FPS, and Ultra falls to 13 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 18 FPS, a 58% reduction, indicating that the GPU is heavily strained even at the lowest preset. The absence of min/max data for Low, High, and Ultra suggests that only averages were captured, but the trend is unambiguous: 4K is not playable under any settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves but still fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold. Low averages 54 FPS, Medium 42 FPS (with min 35 and max 48), High 33 FPS, and Ultra 23 FPS. Even the lowest preset falls short of the playable mark. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 31 FPS drop, a 57% reduction, again pointing to the GPU as the limiting factor.

At 1920x1080, the system finally becomes playable. Low settings deliver an average of 80 FPS, Medium 62 FPS (min 53, max 72), High 49 FPS, and Ultra 34 FPS. Only Low and Medium clear the 60 FPS average, though Medium's minimum of 53 FPS means occasional dips below the target. The difference between Low and Medium is 18 FPS (22.5% drop), between Medium and High is 13 FPS (21% drop), and between High and Ultra is 15 FPS (30.6% drop). This pattern reinforces that the GPU is the bottleneck; the CPU is not the constraint.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, are all within 0.2% of the Core Ultra 5 235's score of 46062. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, the Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970, and the AMD EPYC 7303 scores 45960. In any CPU-bound scenario, swapping to one of these processors would yield nearly identical results. The GPU, however, has a far more telling set of neighbors. The Arc B370's benchmark score of 1184 is matched by the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1168). These are legacy discrete GPUs from over a decade ago, and the Arc B370's performance is effectively on par with them. This explains why the system's frame rates are so low: the GPU is operating at a level comparable to hardware from a different era.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Evolve at 60 FPS?

A: Only at 1920x1080. The recorded data shows that Low and Medium presets achieve average frame rates of 80 and 62 FPS, respectively. No other resolution or preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: 1080p is the only resolution with any playable settings. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, every preset falls below 60 FPS, with the highest average being 54 FPS at 1440p Low.

Q: Is the GPU the primary bottleneck?

A: Yes. The GPU's benchmark score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile, while the CPU's score of 46062 sits in the 89th percentile. The FPS scaling across resolutions and presets further confirms that the GPU cannot handle the load, as frame rates drop sharply when resolution or settings increase.

Q: What is the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium?

A: The recorded minimum is 53 FPS, so while the average is 62 FPS, there are moments when the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS target.

Q: How does this combo compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is within 0.2% of its nearest rivals, meaning performance would be nearly identical if the processor were swapped for an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core i9-13900HX, or an EPYC 4364P/7303.

Q: Where does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: It ranks 3414th out of 3700 combos, meaning only 286 systems perform worse. This places it near the bottom of the database.

The Verdict

The verdict is clear: this PC can run Evolve at 1080p, but only with Low or Medium settings. The best playable preset is Medium, which delivers an average of 62 FPS. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no settings achieve the 60 FPS threshold, so those resolutions are not viable. The data indicates that the GPU is the sole reason for this limitation; the CPU has ample headroom, but the graphics solution cannot keep up.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 62 FPS. Low also qualifies at 80 FPS, but Medium offers better visual quality while still clearing the target. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS, so there is no "best" setting for those resolutions. The highest averages are 54 FPS at 1440p Low and 31 FPS at 4K Low, both far from playable.

CPU and GPU Roles

The CPU is not the limiting factor in Evolve. Its average benchmark score of 46062 places it in the 89th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.2% of that score. The CPU's launch MSRP is $257, but that cost does not translate into high frame rates because the GPU cannot deliver the necessary graphics performance. The GPU's score of 1184, in the 5th percentile, is the clear bottleneck. The FPS scaling supports this: at 1080p Low, the system reaches 80 FPS, but dropping to 1440p Low reduces that to 54 FPS (a 32.5% decline), and further to 4K Low brings it to 31 FPS (a 42.6% decline). This steep drop as resolution increases is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance. Similarly, increasing settings at 1080p from Low to Medium, Medium to High, and High to Ultra yields reductions of 22.5%, 21%, and 30.6%, respectively. The CPU's high compute scores are irrelevant when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. The system is overwhelmingly constrained by the Arc B370's capabilities.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos, this pairing ranks 3414th out of 3700, placing it in the bottom tier. Only 286 systems perform worse. The CPU's strong showing (89th percentile) is completely overshadowed by the GPU's poor showing (5th percentile). The combination of a high-end processor with a very low-end graphics solution results in a system that is only suitable for 1080p gaming at modest settings. The rank reflects the reality that the GPU is the decisive factor for Evolve, and the Arc B370 is simply not equipped for higher resolutions or demanding presets. The data leaves little room for interpretation: this combo is built for low-resolution, low-detail gaming, and nothing more.