Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 88 | 112 | 145 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 155 | 197 | 254 |
| 1080p Full HD | 160 | 231 | 294 | 379 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 produces an extraordinary performance profile for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. The measured data reveals a system that not only clears the 60 FPS threshold at every tested resolution and preset but does so with substantial headroom, particularly at lower resolutions where the frame rates reach multiples of the playability baseline. The combination of a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake processor and the flagship Blackwell GPU creates a scenario where the bottleneck shifts decisively toward the CPU at 1080p, while the GPU's immense 32 GB GDDR7 memory pool and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth dominate at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Evolve shows a consistent scaling pattern across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the lowest preset delivers an average of 379 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings at this resolution, the average drops to 294 FPS with a minimum of 250 FPS and a maximum of 338 FPS. High settings at 1080p still produce a commanding 231 FPS average, while the Ultra preset maintains a robust 160 FPS average. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 219 FPS, indicating that the RTX 5090 scales almost linearly with graphical demands at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high but begins to show the GPU working harder. Low settings produce an average of 254 FPS, while Medium drops to 197 FPS with a minimum of 168 FPS and a maximum of 227 FPS. High settings at 1440p yield 155 FPS average, and Ultra still delivers a strong 107 FPS average. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 147 FPS, a reduction from the 1080p delta that suggests the GPU is becoming more relevant but still has ample headroom.
The 3840x2160 results show the most significant impact of resolution scaling. Low settings at 4K produce 145 FPS average, which is still more than double the playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 112 FPS average with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS. High settings follow at 88 FPS average, and the Ultra preset barely clears the 60 FPS line with a 61 FPS average. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 84 FPS, the smallest gap across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU's rendering workload at 4K Ultra is approaching its practical limits for this title.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains an average at or above 60 FPS for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering 160 FPS average. This represents 2.67 times the playable threshold, meaning the system has substantial headroom even at maximum graphical fidelity. The minimum FPS data is not provided for Ultra at this resolution, but the average alone suggests no risk of dropping below playable levels.
For 2560x1440, Ultra again emerges as the optimal setting with 107 FPS average. This is 1.78 times the 60 FPS threshold, providing a comfortable margin for demanding scenes or background processes. The 1440p Ultra figure is 53 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra result, but the experience remains exceptionally smooth.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset just barely clears the threshold with 61 FPS average. This is the only resolution where the frame rate approaches the playability limit, sitting just 1 FPS above the 60 FPS mark. The data shows that High settings at 4K would provide more comfort at 88 FPS average, but the Ultra preset technically qualifies as playable. The measured Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 95 FPS, which is higher than the Ultra average, indicating that dropping from Ultra to Medium would provide a significant stability buffer.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component takes on the primary workload for Evolve. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role is pronounced. The Core Ultra 5 225, with its 4.90 GHz boost clock and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, is capable of feeding the RTX 5090 enough frames to reach 379 FPS at Low settings. The fact that lowering graphical settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p increases frame rates by 219 FPS suggests the CPU is keeping pace even at the highest frame rates, while the GPU has surplus capability that becomes evident when settings are reduced.
The 2560x1440 results show a more balanced distribution. The 254 FPS at Low settings is 125 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result, while the 107 FPS at Ultra is 53 FPS lower than the 1080p Ultra result. This asymmetric drop — larger at Low settings than at Ultra — indicates that the GPU begins to matter more as resolution increases, but the CPU still handles the geometry and physics workloads effectively. The Core Ultra 5 225's 10 threads, while not hyper-threaded, provide sufficient parallelism for Evolve's 2015-era engine.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The 145 FPS at Low settings is 109 FPS lower than the 1440p Low result, and the 61 FPS at Ultra is 46 FPS lower than the 1440p Ultra result. The RTX 5090's pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s are being heavily taxed at 4K, particularly at Ultra where the 61 FPS average sits just above the playable threshold. The CPU's role at 4K is diminished relative to the GPU, as the rendering workload at 8.3 million pixels per frame overwhelms the differences in graphical settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the measured data shows 61 FPS average at 3840x2160 Ultra, which is 1 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the narrowest margin in the entire dataset, so players seeking more stability might prefer High settings at 88 FPS average.
Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable with this combination?
A: The maximum measured average is 379 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The RTX 5090's 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance enable frame rates far beyond display refresh rates at lower resolutions.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 225 compare to its nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks?
A: The Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36,938, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a score of 36,945, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D trails by 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 trails by 0.4%.
Q: What is the RTX 5090's GPU benchmark position relative to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5090 scores 79,842 on average benchmarks, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X trails by 1.4%.
Q: Is there a risk of frame drops below 60 FPS at any tested setting?
A: The only measured minimum FPS values are for Medium settings: 95 FPS at 4K, 168 FPS at 1440p, and 250 FPS at 1080p. All minimums are well above 60 FPS. For Ultra settings, no minimums are recorded, but the 4K Ultra average of 61 FPS suggests possible dips below 60 FPS during intense scenes.
Q: How does the system's overall ranking in Evolve compare to other tested combinations?
A: This combo ranks 51st out of 3,700 tested combinations in Evolve, placing it in the top 1.4% of all systems benchmarked for this game. This top-tier ranking aligns with the CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 92nd percentile positions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 provide context for CPU-bound scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F matches the Core Ultra 5 225's average benchmark score of 36,945 versus 36,938, a 0% delta. This means in CPU-limited situations, such as 1080p Low settings in Evolve, the Ryzen 5 5600F would produce nearly identical frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018, just 0.2% higher, which would translate to a negligible FPS difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core i9-12900T are similarly close, with scores of 37,093 and 37,112 respectively, all within 0.5% of the Core Ultra 5 225.
For the GPU side, the RTX 5090's nearest rivals show interesting performance parity. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB has an average score of 79,605, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 5090's 79,842 — a remarkable result given the Tesla's enterprise focus. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 is 1.1% lower. In Evolve, these small benchmark deltas would translate to FPS differences of only 1-3 frames at any given resolution and preset. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80,959 is 1.4% higher, potentially yielding a few extra frames at 4K Ultra where the system is most constrained.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Core Ultra 5 225 and RTX 5090 achieves a rank of 51 out of 3,700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the top 1.4% of all systems. This ranking is consistent with the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 85th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 92nd percentile of all graphics cards. The gap between the CPU's percentile and the combo's rank suggests that the GPU's dominance in this pairing carries more weight for Evolve's performance, particularly at higher resolutions where the RTX 5090's 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB memory pool become decisive.
The rank of 51 indicates that only 50 other tested combinations outperform this setup in Evolve. Given that the RTX 5090 is the highest-scoring consumer GPU in the benchmark database, most of those 50 combinations likely pair the RTX 5090 with higher-end CPUs such as the Core Ultra 9 or Ryzen 9 series. However, the performance gap is likely small, as the measured data shows the Core Ultra 5 225 is rarely the limiting factor — even at 1080p Low settings with 379 FPS, the CPU keeps up.
The Verdict
This system can definitively run Evolve, and it does so with exceptional capability across all tested configurations. The verdict by resolution confirms that every preset at every resolution clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 160 FPS average, which is 2.67 times the threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra produces 107 FPS average, providing a 47 FPS margin above the minimum playability. At 3840x2160, Ultra achieves 61 FPS average — technically playable but with only a 1 FPS safety margin.
The 4K Ultra result is the only point of concern in an otherwise dominant performance profile. The data suggests that while the RTX 5090 can handle 4K Ultra in Evolve, the frame rate sits dangerously close to the 60 FPS line. Players who prioritize smoothness over maximum visual fidelity at 4K would benefit from High settings, which deliver 88 FPS average and a more comfortable buffer. At 1440p and below, no such compromise is necessary — the Ultra presets provide abundant headroom for any gameplay scenario, including chaotic multiplayer moments with multiple hunters and monsters on screen.
The measured minimum FPS values at Medium settings — 250 FPS at 1080p, 168 FPS at 1440p, and 95 FPS at 4K — indicate that even the lowest frame dips stay well above the playable threshold. This system is not just capable of running Evolve; it is capable of running it at maximum settings with frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of most monitors at 1080p and 1440p, and it barely maintains playability at 4K Ultra. For a game released in 2015, this modern hardware combination provides a definitive, future-proofed experience that leaves virtually no performance stone unturned.