Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 39 | 47 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 45 | 69 | 83 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 97 | 126 | 161 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 presents a fascinating study in bottleneck dynamics for the 2015 FPS title Evolve. The data shows a system with immense CPU headroom, leaving the GPU as the definitive performance arbiter. Across all tested resolutions, the scaling from Low to Ultra presets reveals a predictable collapse in frame rates as graphical load increases, with the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth proving sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but strained at 4K. The benchmark results indicate that this combination is highly capable for high-refresh 1080p play, yet it requires careful preset selection to maintain smooth gameplay at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combination delivers exceptional headroom. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 160.8 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold. Moving to Medium drops the average to 125.6 FPS, still a very fluid experience. High settings yield 97.1 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a solid 68.7 FPS average. This indicates that at 1080p, the RX 7600 is never the limiting factor; the CPU's raw power, evidenced by its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, ensures consistent frame delivery even in CPU-intensive scenes.
Stepping up to 2560x1440 introduces a noticeable shift. Low settings produce an average of 110.4 FPS, which remains highly playable. Medium settings average 82.9 FPS, and High settings still clear the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 68.7 FPS. However, the Ultra preset sees a dramatic drop to 44.5 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. The data shows a clear inflection point at 1440p Ultra, where the GPU's pixel throughput (169.9 GPixel/s) and texture rate (339.8 GTexel/s) become insufficient to maintain fluid motion. The gap between Medium (82.9 FPS) and Ultra (44.5 FPS) is a stark 38.4 FPS, suggesting that Ultra settings introduce shading or post-processing effects that disproportionately impact the RDNA 3.0 architecture.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture becomes more constrained. Low settings average 61.6 FPS, barely clearing the playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 46.7 FPS, High settings fall to 39.2 FPS, and Ultra settings plummet to 26.6 FPS. The data reveals that 4K is only viable with the lowest preset, and even then, the margin is slim. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings shows a reduction from 68.7 FPS to 39.2 FPS, a 43% decrease, which aligns with the approximate 2.25x increase in pixel count. This suggests the GPU is operating near its memory bandwidth and compute limits at 4K, with the 128-bit memory bus proving a bottleneck despite the 18 Gbps effective memory speed.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the CPU, the Intel Core i9-14900K's closest competitor is the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371 in the average benchmark suite, representing a negligible -0.3% delta. This means the KF variant, which lacks integrated graphics, would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Evolve. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79574 average score, -0.6% delta) and the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041 average score, -1.2% delta) are also near-identical in CPU-bound tasks, though the EPYC's server-oriented design may not offer the same gaming-specific optimizations. Interestingly, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, a +1.7% delta, placing it slightly above the i9-14900K in the aggregate benchmark, but this difference would be imperceptible in Evolve's frame rates.
On the GPU side, the RX 7600's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, which scores 15199 on average, a -0.2% delta from the RX 7600's 15171. This indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM would produce nearly identical FPS in Evolve across all settings. The AMD Radeon 680M (15270 average score, -0.7% delta) is an integrated graphics solution that surprisingly benchmarks close to the RX 7600 in synthetic tests, but its real-world gaming performance would likely differ due to memory bandwidth constraints. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X (15082 average score, +0.6% delta) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15063 average score, +0.7% delta) are also within the same performance envelope, though the GTX 660 Ti's older architecture would lack modern driver optimizations for Evolve.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 4K resolution with playable frame rates?*
A: Yes, but only with Low settings. The measured data shows an average of 61.6 FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings, which just exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 46.7 FPS, and High/Ultra fall to 39.2 FPS and 26.6 FPS respectively, all of which are below the playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: High settings. The benchmark results show 68.7 FPS average at 2560x1440 with High settings. Medium settings average 82.9 FPS, and Low settings average 110.4 FPS. Ultra settings fail to maintain 60 FPS, averaging only 44.5 FPS.
Q: How does the Ultra preset performance at 1080p compare to High at 1440p?
A: They are identical in average FPS. Both configurations produce exactly 68.7 FPS. This suggests that the visual quality uplift from 1080p Ultra to 1440p High comes at no average frame rate cost, though minimum frame rates could differ.
Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K a bottleneck for the RX 7600 in this game?
A: No. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the i9-14900KF, performs within -0.3% in aggregate benchmarks. The FPS scaling across resolutions follows GPU-bound patterns, indicating the RX 7600 is the limiting component.
Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average is 125.6 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold of 60 FPS, providing a smooth experience suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Does the RX 7600's 8 GB memory capacity impact performance at 4K?
A: The data suggests memory capacity is not the primary issue at 4K, but rather the GPU's compute throughput. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus are likely the limiting factors, as evidenced by the steep FPS drop from Low (61.6 FPS) to Medium (46.7 FPS) at 3840x2160.
The Verdict
The data conclusively shows that this system can run Evolve, but the playable experience is heavily dependent on resolution and preset selection. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the Ultra preset achieving 68.7 FPS average. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combination, offering the full visual experience without compromise. At 2560x1440, the verdict is more nuanced: High settings are playable at 68.7 FPS, Medium at 82.9 FPS, and Low at 110.4 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 44.5 FPS. Users targeting 1440p should stick to High or below for consistent 60+ FPS gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the system is only marginally playable. Low settings average 61.6 FPS, which clears the threshold, but any preset above Low results in sub-60 FPS performance. The verdict for 4K is that the RX 7600 is insufficient for a comfortable experience; the 26.6 FPS at Ultra is nearly unplayable, and even Medium at 46.7 FPS would feel choppy in a fast-paced FPS. The data indicates that this combination is best suited for 1080p gaming, with 1440p being viable only with reduced settings. The 60 FPS playable threshold is consistently met at 1080p across all presets and at 1440p up to High settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
For players prioritizing a consistent 60 FPS experience, the most demanding preset that maintains this threshold varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 68.7 FPS, making it the highest quality option that stays above the playable threshold. This is the recommended configuration for 1080p displays, as it provides the full graphical feature set while maintaining smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 68.7 FPS, which is the most demanding setting that clears 60 FPS. While Medium offers a higher 82.9 FPS average, High provides superior visual fidelity without dropping below the playable mark. The Ultra preset at 44.5 FPS is not recommended, as it introduces a noticeable reduction in smoothness.
For 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 61.6 FPS. This is the sole viable option at 4K, and even then, the margin above 60 FPS is slim. Users with 4K displays should expect to sacrifice most graphical enhancements to maintain playability. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this GPU requires significant compromise, and Medium settings at 46.7 FPS would be preferable only if the user accepts sub-60 FPS performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 2502 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested hardware pairings, which is noteworthy given the CPU's top-tier status (95th percentile among all CPUs). The ranking indicates that the GPU is the primary determinant of this combo's position, as the RX 7600 sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy between CPU and GPU percentiles highlights a significant imbalance in the system's capabilities.
The rank of 2502 suggests that many other combinations, likely those with mid-range CPUs paired with higher-end GPUs, would outperform this setup in Evolve. For context, the CPU's nearest rivals (i9-14900KF, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus) would not change the ranking if swapped in, as their performance deltas are under 1%. However, upgrading the GPU to a model with higher average benchmark scores would substantially improve the combo's rank. The data implies that this pairing is CPU-overkill for Evolve, and the money spent on the i9-14900K would have been better allocated to a more powerful graphics card for this specific game.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU. At 1920x1080, the CPU's dominance is evident: the i9-14900K's 24 cores, 32 threads, and 36 MB of L3 cache provide ample processing power to feed the GPU. The benchmark results show that even at Ultra settings (68.7 FPS), the frame rate is not CPU-limited, as the CPU's single-thread performance (2262.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is more than sufficient for a 2015 FPS title. The GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, which is typical for modern games.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The drop from Low (110.4 FPS) to Ultra (44.5 FPS) is a 59.7% reduction, indicating that pixel shading and fill rate are the primary constraints. The RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance is challenged by the increased pixel count, and the 128-bit memory bus (288.0 GB/s) cannot keep up with the data demands of higher resolutions. The CPU's contribution is minimal here, as even the most demanding preset does not expose a CPU bottleneck.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The 4K resolution quadruples the pixel count of 1080p, and the RX 7600's 64 ROPs and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate are insufficient. The data shows a steep decline from Low (61.6 FPS) to Ultra (26.6 FPS), a 56.8% drop, which underscores the GPU's inability to handle 4K rendering. The CPU's role is negligible at this resolution, as the i9-14900K's capabilities far exceed what Evolve requires for physics, AI, and game logic. The scaling between resolutions at the same settings confirms this: High settings drop from 97.1 FPS at 1080p to 68.7 FPS at 1440p to 39.2 FPS at 4K, a pattern consistent with GPU-bound performance. The conclusion is that for Evolve, the GPU is the sole determinant of playability across all tested resolutions, and the CPU's substantial horsepower is largely unused headroom.