Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 63 | 85 | 110 | 143 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 149 | 193 | 251 |
| 1080p Full HD | 156 | 225 | 289 | 371 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers a dominant performance profile in Evolve, with measured frame rates that consistently exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every resolution and preset combination tested. The data indicates this is a top-tier configuration for the title, ranking in the 90th percentile out of 3,700 tested combos, with all 12 measured scenarios—spanning 1080p, 1440p, and 4K—returning average frame rates well above the playable baseline.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces exceptional headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. The Low preset reaches an average of 371.3 FPS, representing the absolute ceiling of the system’s rasterization throughput at this resolution. Moving to Medium yields 288.7 FPS, while High retains a substantial 224.8 FPS average. The most demanding Ultra preset still maintains an average of 156.3 FPS, which leaves considerable margin above the 60 FPS threshold and indicates that even with maximum settings, the GPU is far from saturated.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance scales predictably but remains exceedingly high. The Low preset delivers 251.4 FPS, which is still above the 1080p High result, showcasing the GPU’s raw capability. Medium produces 193.2 FPS, and High settles at 149.2 FPS. At Ultra, the average drops to 103.2 FPS, which is a notable reduction from the 1080p Ultra figure but still comfortably above 100 FPS, making this resolution and preset combination ideal for high-refresh 1440p panels.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are more fully exercised. The Low preset averages 142.8 FPS, demonstrating that even at 4K, the system can push well beyond standard 60 Hz displays. Medium drops to 109.9 FPS, while High maintains a robust 85.4 FPS. The Ultra preset, which imposes the heaviest load, yields a 62.8 FPS average—this sits just above the 60 FPS playability threshold, making it the only scenario in the entire dataset where the margin narrows to less than 5%. No minimum or maximum frame rate data is available, so the analysis relies solely on averages, but the consistent scaling across resolutions suggests stable performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high—ranging from 156.3 FPS at Ultra to 371.3 FPS at Low—that the CPU’s role becomes more prominent, particularly in the less demanding presets where the GPU can complete frames faster than the processor can feed them. The Intel Core i7-14700KF, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, provides ample single-thread performance for this scenario, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,235 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,578. The GPU, however, is not the limiting factor at this resolution; the scaling from Low to Ultra (a 2.37x reduction in FPS) suggests the rendering load is the primary variable.
At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role, but the CPU still has enough headroom to maintain high utilization. The frame rate drop from 1080p to 1440p across presets is roughly 32-34% at each setting, which aligns with the increased pixel count. This proportional scaling indicates that the RTX 4090 is becoming the primary determinant of performance, while the CPU continues to supply frames without bottlenecking. The 149.2 FPS High result and 103.2 FPS Ultra result both show that the system is operating in a GPU-bound regime, yet the CPU’s multi-core strength—evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167—ensures no stutter from thread scheduling.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the dominant component. The RTX 4090’s 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are fully engaged, and the frame rates reflect this: the gap between Low (142.8 FPS) and Ultra (62.8 FPS) is a 2.27x difference, which is slightly less pronounced than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU’s compute and memory subsystems are the critical path. The CPU’s role diminishes to ensuring consistent frame pacing, which its high single-thread and multi-thread scores support. The transition from 1440p to 4K incurs a 43% performance drop at High settings (149.2 to 85.4 FPS), a steeper decline than the 1080p-to-1440p transition, confirming that pixel throughput, not CPU logic, is the limiting factor.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 156.3 FPS. This is the optimal choice for users prioritizing visual quality, as the system has over 2.6x the required headroom.
At 2560x1440, Ultra again qualifies as the best playable setting, delivering an average of 103.2 FPS. This provides a 72% margin above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even in action-heavy sequences.
For 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains playable but with a much thinner margin, averaging 62.8 FPS—just 4.7% above the threshold. This is the most demanding scenario in the dataset, and while it clears the playability bar, users who prefer a larger safety buffer might opt for High, which averages 85.4 FPS. Based strictly on the data, Ultra is the highest preset that meets the 60 FPS criterion, but the proximity to the threshold makes High the more conservative recommendation for consistent performance.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is the closest match, with a score of 69,996 versus the i7-14700KF’s 70,163—a negligible 0.2% difference. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 9700F would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Evolve, assuming no other system bottlenecks. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX trails by 0.4% (69,875), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind (69,515). On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70,879, which is 1% higher than the i7-14700KF, suggesting it might offer a marginal improvement in CPU-bound scenarios like the 1080p Low preset. All four alternatives are within a 1% band, so any of them would produce comparable gameplay experiences.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are clustered even tighter. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches the RTX 4090’s average score of 60,347 with a 0% delta, though this is a workstation-oriented card and its real-world gaming performance may differ. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% behind (60,140), while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% ahead (61,896) and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% behind (58,657). These deltas are all within 3%, meaning that in Evolve, the frame rates would be nearly indistinguishable—though the RTX 4090’s 24 GB memory and higher shader count (16,384) could matter in other titles, the data shows no meaningful difference in this game’s measured performance.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K with all settings maxed out?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average frame rate is 62.8 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold. However, the margin is slim (4.7%), so users seeking more headroom may prefer High at 85.4 FPS.
Q: What is the highest frame rate achievable with this hardware?
A: The maximum measured average is 371.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the only scenario in the dataset that exceeds 300 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival for this game?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70,163, which is just 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996). The performance difference in Evolve would be imperceptible.
Q: Is the GPU more important than the CPU at 1440p?
A: Yes, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent 32-34% frame rate drop across all presets, which indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s role is to maintain frame pacing, which it does effectively.
Q: What is the least demanding preset that still reaches 60 FPS at 4K?
A: All presets at 4K exceed 60 FPS, including the most demanding Ultra at 62.8 FPS. The Low preset reaches 142.8 FPS, offering the largest margin.
Q: How does this system rank among all tested configurations?
A: It ranks 90th out of 3,700 combos, placing it in the top 2.4% of all tested hardware pairings for Evolve.
The Verdict
The data is unequivocal: this PC can run Evolve at every resolution and preset tested, with all 12 combinations clearing the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 156.3 FPS on Ultra, which is more than sufficient for high-refresh gaming. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 103.2 FPS, providing a strong balance of visual fidelity and performance. At 3840x2160, Ultra just barely clears the bar at 62.8 FPS, while High offers a more comfortable 85.4 FPS. The verdict by resolution confirms all settings are playable, but the 4K Ultra scenario is the only one where the margin is tight. For the vast majority of users, this configuration offers exceptional performance headroom, and the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking among all processors alongside the GPU’s 88th percentile ensures that neither component will be a limiting factor in this title. The only caveat is the slim 4K Ultra margin, but for a game released in 2015, this hardware is overkill in the best possible way.