Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 35 | 45 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 65 | 86 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 100 | 126 | 158 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers a markedly uneven performance profile in Evolve, scaling from a fully playable 1080p experience to a barely usable 4K one. Benchmark data shows the combination is clearly capable at mainstream resolutions, but the demands of higher pixel counts quickly expose the GPU’s limitations. The system ranks 2672 out of 3700 tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. While the CPU is a high-end part, the RX 6600 XT’s 8 GB frame buffer and mid-range compute power define the overall experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers consistently high frame rates across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 158.2 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 126 FPS, still a very comfortable margin. High settings yield 99.7 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 69.6 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 88.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom to absorb the increased load without falling below playability. No minimum or maximum frame time data is available in the measured results, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the picture changes significantly. Low settings average 106.3 FPS, which remains excellent. Medium settings drop to 86.1 FPS, and High settings fall to 65.3 FPS. Ultra, however, collapses to 42.4 FPS, a figure that falls well short of the 60 FPS threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 63.9 FPS, and the step from High to Ultra alone costs 22.9 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset’s additional effects and geometry place a disproportionate strain on the RX 6600 XT. The 1440p High setting is the highest preset that remains playable, but it does so with only a 5.3 FPS margin above the playability line.
At 3840x2160, the results are largely disappointing. Low settings average 60.6 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 45.4 FPS, High falls to 34.6 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 24.7 FPS. The scaling here is steep: moving from Low to Medium costs 15.2 FPS, and the jump from Medium to High costs another 10.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is a substantial 35.9 FPS. This resolution clearly exceeds the GPU’s comfortable operating range, with only the absolute lowest settings providing a playable experience. The data shows that the i7-14700F’s processing power cannot compensate for the RX 6600 XT’s memory bandwidth and shading throughput limitations at 4K.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all high-core-count server or enthusiast parts. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, a negligible 0.2% delta from the i7-14700F’s average. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, a 0.6% delta. Finally, the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, representing a 0.8% gap. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, swapping the i7-14700F for any of these parts would produce nearly identical frame rates. For gaming purposes, the Ryzen 9 7900X is the most relevant comparison, as it is a mainstream desktop part; its performance parity means the i7-14700F is not leaving any meaningful CPU performance on the table in Evolve.
On the GPU side, the RX 6600 XT’s nearest rivals are an eclectic mix. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277, a 0.7% delta. The Intel Arc A350M scores 24647, which is 0.8% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 24236, a 0.8% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, a 1.1% delta. The most notable comparison here is the RTX 2080 SUPER, which is a much more powerful card in absolute terms but lands within 1.1% of the RX 6600 XT’s average benchmark score. This suggests that the benchmark aggregation method places these cards in a similar performance band, despite their architectural differences. In practical terms, a system with an RTX 2080 SUPER would produce frame rates in Evolve that are nearly indistinguishable from the RX 6600 XT, assuming the same CPU. The GTX 780 Ti, an older card, also lands within a percentage point, though its driver support and feature set would differ. For users considering an upgrade or a sidegrade, these are the parts to look at.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 69.6 FPS. This is the ideal configuration for a 1080p display, as it maximizes visual quality while keeping a 9.6 FPS safety margin above the playability threshold. Users could attempt to run higher frame rates by dropping to High, which yields 99.7 FPS, but the Ultra preset is the best balance of fidelity and performance.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is High, with an average of 65.3 FPS. Ultra falls to 42.4 FPS and is not viable. The margin at High is slim at 5.3 FPS, so users who prioritize smoothness over visuals might prefer Medium at 86.1 FPS. However, for a 1440p panel, High is the ceiling that maintains 60 FPS, and it is the recommended choice.
At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 60.6 FPS. This is a razor-thin margin of just 0.6 FPS above the threshold, meaning any scene with heavier load could dip below 60. The Medium preset at 45.4 FPS is not playable, so users on 4K displays must accept the lowest possible quality settings to get a playable experience. There is no headroom for additional visual effects or higher resolutions.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Evolve, but the answer depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, including Ultra. This is the sweet spot for this combination, offering a fully playable experience with high visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the verdict is conditional: High settings average 65.3 FPS and are playable, but Ultra is not. Users must be willing to cap their settings at High to maintain smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the system is only playable at Low settings, with an average of 60.6 FPS. Any preset above Low fails to reach the threshold. The verdict by resolution is clear: this combo is a strong 1080p performer, a decent 1440p performer with settings compromises, and a marginal 4K performer that can only manage the lowest quality level.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU has ample headroom. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s role is more prominent, as the frame rates at Low (158.2 FPS) and Medium (126 FPS) are high enough that the i7-14700F’s single-thread performance is likely the limiting factor. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and multi-core score of 35122 are strong, and the 20-core, 28-thread configuration is overkill for Evolve. The game’s FPS genre typically relies on a few fast cores, and the i7-14700F’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides ample performance. However, the 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database suggests that this part is not the limiting component.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU takes over as the dominant factor. The frame rate drop from 1440p High (65.3 FPS) to 4K High (34.6 FPS) is 30.7 FPS, a 47% reduction. This scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload. The RX 6600 XT’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 10.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, regardless of CPU capability. The CPU’s performance delta between 1440p and 4K is negligible, confirming that the GPU is the sole constraint. In short, the i7-14700F is more than capable of feeding the RX 6600 XT at all resolutions, but the GPU’s limits are exposed as pixel count rises.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 2672 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the 28th percentile of all systems tested for this game, meaning roughly 72% of tested combinations deliver better performance. Given that the GPU has a percentile rank of 70 among all GPUs and the CPU ranks at 91 among all CPUs, the combo’s overall rank is dragged down by the GPU. The data suggests that this pairing is unbalanced: the CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU is only mid-range. In a game like Evolve, where the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates at higher resolutions, this imbalance results in a lower overall rank. The system is not a high-end performer, but it is far from the bottom of the pack. Users with this configuration should target 1080p or 1440p gaming to get the most out of the hardware, as the 4K experience is marginal at best.