Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 57 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 80 | 106 | 133 |
| 1080p Full HD | 86 | 119 | 153 | 200 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti delivers a clear performance picture for Evolve: this combination is fully capable of running the game at 1080p and 1440p with high frame rates, while 4K requires a settings reduction to remain smooth. The measured data shows a strong CPU and a mid-range GPU working together, with results that scale predictably across resolutions and presets.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, but only at Low settings. At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces an average of 76.8 FPS, while Medium drops to 56.9 FPS, High to 46.3 FPS, and Ultra to 34.1 FPS. Only Low clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, delivering an average of 79.8 FPS. The Medium preset runs at 106.0 FPS, and Low at 133.2 FPS, but Ultra falls below the threshold at 54.7 FPS.
Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 85.5 FPS, making it fully playable. The lower presets perform even better, with High at 118.9 FPS, Medium at 153.3 FPS, and Low reaching 200.0 FPS.
Q: Which component limits performance at 4K Ultra?
A: The GPU is the primary constraint at 3840x2160. The frame rate drops from 76.8 FPS at Low to 34.1 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of more than half, indicating that the graphics card's processing capacity is the bottleneck at this resolution and preset.
Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti a strong performer compared to similar GPUs?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti scores in the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 0.7% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 1.4% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is 1.4% lower in average score.
Q: How does the Core i7-13700K rank against other CPUs?
A: The Core i7-13700K sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 46881 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971, 0.2% lower), with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX also within 0.5% of its score.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that still maintains an average of 85.5 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest visual quality setting available in the data, so the combination has headroom to spare at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 79.8 FPS. The step down from Ultra to High is significant: Ultra averages 54.7 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target, while High provides a 25.1 FPS improvement. This makes High the clear pick for 1440p gaming with this hardware.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 76.8 FPS. Medium drops to 56.9 FPS, which is below the threshold. The data shows a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium at 4K, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a workload that shifts between CPU and GPU dependency depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a larger role in frame rate delivery. The Low preset reaches 200.0 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 85.5 FPS. This 114.5 FPS spread shows that the GPU becomes more stressed as settings increase, but even at Ultra, the frame rate remains high, suggesting the Core i7-13700K can feed the RTX 3060 Ti effectively at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's influence grows. The Low preset averages 133.2 FPS, which is 66.8 FPS lower than at 1080p, while the Ultra preset drops to 54.7 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 78.5 FPS reduction, compared to a 114.5 FPS reduction at 1080p. This tighter spread indicates that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor, though the CPU still contributes to the higher frame rates at lower settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant component. The Low preset averages 76.8 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 34.1 FPS. The performance gap between Low and Ultra is 42.7 FPS, which is the smallest absolute difference across all resolutions. This compression of frame rates shows that the RTX 3060 Ti is fully saturated at 4K, and the CPU's role is diminished. The data suggests that players targeting 4K should prioritize GPU settings, while 1080p players benefit more from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance.
The Verdict
This PC can run Evolve successfully at all three tested resolutions, provided the right settings are selected. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on every preset, including Ultra at 85.5 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this combination, offering full visual fidelity with a comfortable frame rate margin.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on High, Medium, and Low presets. The High preset at 79.8 FPS is the best balance of quality and performance, while Ultra falls below the threshold at 54.7 FPS. Players who prioritize frame rate over visuals can use the Medium preset at 106.0 FPS for a smoother experience.
At 3840x2160, the system is playable only on the Low preset, which averages 76.8 FPS. The data shows that the RTX 3060 Ti does not have enough headroom for Medium or higher settings at 4K. The verdict is clear: this combination excels at 1080p, handles 1440p well with settings adjustments, and requires low settings for acceptable 4K performance.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals are all within a narrow performance band. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.2% lower than the Core i7-13700K's 46881. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, 0.3% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46654) and Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653) are both 0.5% lower. These small deltas mean that swapping the Core i7-13700K for any of these CPUs would result in nearly identical frame rates in Evolve, with differences well under one percent.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361) and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351) are both 1.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862) is 1.7% lower. These close scores indicate that all these GPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Evolve, with the RTX 3060 Ti sitting squarely in the middle of its peer group. The performance differences are so small that users would not notice a practical change in frame rates when switching among these alternatives.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 1818 out of 3700 tested combos in the database for Evolve. This places the system in the middle of the pack, slightly below the 50th percentile. The ranking reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning, as the CPU is a high-end part that ranks in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's 59th percentile score drags the overall combo ranking down, indicating that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing.
The rank of 1818 out of 3700 means that roughly half of the tested combinations perform better in Evolve. This is consistent with the measured frame rates: the system is playable at all resolutions with appropriate settings, but it does not deliver top-tier performance. The data suggests that this combo is a solid mid-range option, well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not competitive with high-end GPU pairings at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a wide range of performance across presets. The Low preset averages 200.0 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combination. The Medium preset drops to 153.3 FPS, still very high. The High preset averages 118.9 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 85.5 FPS. All presets clear the 60 FPS threshold by a substantial margin, with the gap between Low and Ultra being 114.5 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates compress but remain playable. The Low preset averages 133.2 FPS, followed by Medium at 106.0 FPS and High at 79.8 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold at 54.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 78.5 FPS, showing a steeper drop as settings increase compared to the 1440p results.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly taxed. The Low preset averages 76.8 FPS, which is the only playable option. The Medium preset drops to 56.9 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 46.3 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 34.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 42.7 FPS, the smallest absolute spread across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU is the dominant bottleneck at 4K. The data shows no min or max FPS values recorded, so the analysis relies on average frame rates, but the pattern is consistent: this combination delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, while 4K requires Low settings for a smooth experience.