Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 56 | 75 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 69 | 102 | 131 | 168 |
| 1080p Full HD | 102 | 151 | 193 | 250 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a robust Evolve experience, but it is not a blanket 60 FPS performer at every setting. Benchmark data shows this combination is fully capable of high-refresh-rate play at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires preset compromises to maintain playability. The system ranks in the 1088th position out of 3700 tested combinations, placing it in the upper third of all hardware pairings for this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, this configuration produces exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset delivers an average of 249.7 FPS, which is more than quadruple the 60 FPS playability threshold. Medium settings see a drop to 193 FPS, still a massive margin of comfort for competitive play. High settings yield 150.6 FPS, while the demanding Ultra preset maintains a strong 101.6 FPS average. Every 1080p preset clears the playability bar with at least 41.6 FPS of headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably but remains impressive. Low settings produce 167.8 FPS, while Medium sustains 131.1 FPS. High settings hold at 101.6 FPS, matching the 1080p Ultra figure exactly. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 69.3 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable 9.3 FPS margin. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 31.8% performance reduction on Ultra, from 101.6 to 69.3 FPS, indicating the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count rises.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Ultra settings fall to 40.9 FPS, which is 19.1 FPS below the playability threshold and not suitable for smooth gameplay. High settings at 4K produce 56.2 FPS, narrowly missing the 60 FPS target by 3.8 FPS. Medium settings recover to 74.9 FPS, providing a playable experience, while Low settings reach 94.1 FPS. The gap between Ultra and Low at 4K is 53.2 FPS, showing how significantly preset selection impacts performance at this resolution.
The overall scaling pattern reveals that resolution has a greater impact on frame rates than preset changes between 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the preset choice becomes the dominant factor. The difference between 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra is 60.7 FPS, while the difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low is 155.6 FPS, showing that the GPU's rendering load scales steeply with pixel count.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals indicate that the Intel Core i7-12700K performs nearly identically to several other processors in this game. The Intel Core i5-13600T posts an average score 0.1% lower, making it a virtually indistinguishable alternative for Evolve. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 0.2% higher, which is within measurement noise. The Intel Core i7-13700T is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core 5 213PE is 0.4% ahead. None of these differences would produce a perceptible change in Evolve's frame rates.
On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9070's nearest rivals are a mixed bag of older and mobile parts. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 0.6% higher, meaning it would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Evolve. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S is 0.8% lower, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is 1.1% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is 1.2% lower. These deltaPct values confirm that the RX 9070 sits in a performance band where small benchmark differences translate to negligible real-world FPS changes.
For a user considering alternatives, any of these four GPU options would behave almost exactly like the RX 9070 in Evolve. The same applies to the CPU side, where swapping the i7-12700K for any of its four nearest rivals would not alter the measured FPS results meaningfully. The combined system performance is therefore representative of a broader family of hardware configurations.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary performance driver in Evolve, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU can feed the GPU sufficiently across all presets, as evidenced by the 249.7 FPS Low preset result. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for the game's FPS workload, and its 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it is not a bottleneck.
The scaling between resolutions at the same preset reveals the GPU's diminishing capacity as pixel count increases. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 249.7 FPS at 1080p to 167.8 FPS at 1440p, then to 94.1 FPS at 4K. This 62.3% reduction from 1080p to 4K is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load, since the CPU workload does not change significantly with resolution. At Ultra settings, the drop from 101.6 FPS at 1080p to 40.9 FPS at 4K is a 59.7% reduction, showing that the GPU is saturated at 4K Ultra.
At 1440p, the system maintains playability at all presets, including Ultra at 69.3 FPS. This suggests that the CPU-GPU balance is well matched for 1440p gaming, with neither component clearly limiting the other. At 1080p, the CPU's role becomes more prominent relative to the GPU, but it still delivers enough throughput to keep the GPU busy. At 4K, the GPU is unambiguously the limiting factor, as the CPU's performance headroom cannot compensate for the GPU's rendering constraints.
The Verdict
The answer to whether this PC can run Evolve is yes, with qualifications depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, from Low at 249.7 FPS to Ultra at 101.6 FPS. This resolution offers complete freedom of choice for the user, with no settings off-limits.
At 2560x1440, all four presets also remain playable. Ultra delivers 69.3 FPS, which is above 60 FPS but leaves less margin for demanding scenes. Low, Medium, and High presets all provide well over 100 FPS, making 1440p an excellent fit for high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 3840x2160, the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at High or Ultra settings. High produces 56.2 FPS, which is 3.8 FPS short, and Ultra is at 40.9 FPS. However, Medium settings deliver 74.9 FPS and Low settings reach 94.1 FPS, so 4K gaming is viable with preset adjustments. The verdict by resolution confirms this: 4K supports Low and Medium as playable settings, 1440p supports all four, and 1080p supports all four.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 40.9 FPS, which falls 19.1 FPS below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable 4K setting is Medium, which averages 74.9 FPS.
Q: What is the best 1440p preset for this hardware?
A: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440 is Ultra, which averages 69.3 FPS. High settings provide 101.6 FPS, offering a smoother experience with less visual fidelity.
Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K at the same settings?
A: At Low settings, 1080p delivers 249.7 FPS versus 94.1 FPS at 4K, a 155.6 FPS difference. At Ultra settings, 1080p delivers 101.6 FPS versus 40.9 FPS at 4K, a 60.7 FPS difference.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 2560x1440?
A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary constraint at 1440p, as frame rates scale down from 167.8 FPS at Low to 69.3 FPS at Ultra, showing the GPU's workload increases with preset complexity. The CPU maintains sufficient throughput across all presets.
Q: Does this system clear 60 FPS at 3840x2160 High?
A: No. The measured average at 4K High is 56.2 FPS, which is 3.8 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold. Users must select Medium or Low settings for a playable 4K experience.
Q: What frame rate does this system achieve at 1920x1080 High?
A: The measured average is 150.6 FPS, which is 90.6 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This preset provides a substantial margin for smooth gameplay on high-refresh-rate displays.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 101.6 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining a 41.6 FPS buffer above the playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 69.3 FPS. This is the maximum preset that clears 60 FPS, though the margin is tighter at 9.3 FPS. Users prioritizing frame rate stability over visual fidelity may prefer High at 101.6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding playable preset is Medium, delivering 74.9 FPS. High settings fail to reach 60 FPS at this resolution, so Medium represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. Low settings provide 94.1 FPS for users who prioritize smoothness above all else.