Evolve

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination shows a clear performance curve that scales predictably with resolution and preset level. At 3840x2160, the combo manages 60 FPS on Low settings, which is exactly at the playable threshold. Medium drops to 45.7 FPS, High falls further to 38.8 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 24.8 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming is possible only when visual fidelity is heavily reduced, and even then the average sits precisely at the 60 FPS line with no headroom for demanding scenes.

Moving to 2560x1440, the situation improves considerably. Low settings produce 107 FPS, Medium reaches 84.6 FPS, and High delivers 64.9 FPS. Ultra drops below the playable threshold at 47.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 59.2 FPS, showing that preset selection has a substantial impact at this resolution. The High preset remains above 60 FPS, which is notable because it offers a balanced visual experience while staying playable.

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its strongest performance. Low settings reach 161.3 FPS, Medium hits 123.5 FPS, High achieves 99.8 FPS, and even Ultra stays above the threshold at 69 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 92.3 FPS drop, yet every preset clears the playable threshold. This resolution is clearly where this hardware pairing is most comfortable, with Ultra providing a playable experience despite being the most demanding setting.

The measured data contains only average FPS values; minimum and maximum frame times were not recorded for any resolution or preset. This means the analysis relies on average performance, which can mask occasional frame drops. However, the average figures across all three resolutions suggest consistent behavior, with the largest performance deficit appearing at 4K Ultra where the average falls to 24.8 FPS, a figure that would likely feel sluggish during fast-paced gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The database places this combination at rank 2530 out of 3700 tested combinations for Evolve. This positions it in the lower third of tested hardware pairings, meaning a substantial portion of other combos in the database deliver higher average performance in this game. The percentile standing is not directly provided for the combo itself, but the rank implies that roughly 68 percent of tested combinations outperform it.

Interpreting this rank requires context. The CPU sits at the 47th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all tested graphics cards. The combo rank of 2530 out of 3700 suggests that the pairing does not exceed what either component would individually suggest, and the game's demands may favor one component more heavily. The recorded FPS data shows playable performance at 1080p and 1440p across multiple presets, so the rank reflects relative standing among faster combinations rather than an inability to run the game.

The rank also indicates that users with higher-tier combinations will see better results, particularly at 4K where only the Low preset reaches the playable threshold. For a game released in 2015, this hardware pairing delivers competent performance at mainstream resolutions, but the database ranking shows that many alternatives achieve higher frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Evolve at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 69 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?

A: High settings deliver 64.9 FPS at 1440p, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Ultra falls to 47.8 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?

A: Only on Low settings, which produce exactly 60 FPS on average. Medium drops to 45.7 FPS, High to 38.8 FPS, and Ultra to 24.8 FPS, all below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2254. The Intel Core i7-1068NG7 scores 2259, which is 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, 0.4 percent lower. The Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, 0.4 percent higher.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, 0.7 percent higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082, 0.6 percent lower.

Q: What performance difference exists between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: Low settings produce 161.3 FPS, while Ultra produces 69 FPS. This represents a 92.3 FPS difference, showing that preset choice significantly affects performance at this resolution.

The Verdict

This combination can run Evolve, but the experience depends heavily on resolution and preset choices. At 1920x1080, every preset including Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 69 FPS. This makes 1080p the most versatile resolution for this pairing, offering playable performance across the full range of settings.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 64.9 FPS, which is above the threshold, and Low and Medium reach 107 FPS and 84.6 FPS respectively. Ultra falls below the threshold at 47.8 FPS, so users at this resolution should stick to High or lower. At 3840x2160, only Low settings reach 60 FPS exactly, with all other presets falling below the playable threshold. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 45.7, 38.8, and 24.8 FPS respectively, none of which are suitable for consistent gameplay.

The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p supports all presets, 1440p supports up to High, and 4K supports only Low. Users targeting higher visual fidelity should stay at 1080p or 1440p, while those prioritizing 4K must accept significant compromises.

CPU and GPU Roles

The interaction between the Intel Core i5-9400 and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 shifts depending on resolution and preset. At 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly, as shown by the 161.3 FPS result on Low settings. The CPU becomes the limiting factor at higher frame rates, since the six-core processor must feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The 69 FPS result at Ultra suggests that the GPU is still capable, but the reduced frame rate compared to Low indicates that the rendering load is increasing while the CPU keeps up adequately.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload. Low settings produce 107 FPS, which is still high, but the drop from 161.3 FPS at 1080p Low to 107 FPS at 1440p Low shows that pixel throughput is becoming more demanding. The High preset at 64.9 FPS and Ultra at 47.8 FPS demonstrate that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution, as the CPU has less work relative to the rendering load.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. Low settings produce exactly 60 FPS, while Medium drops to 45.7 FPS and High to 38.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 35.2 FPS difference, which is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering capacity at higher pixel counts. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution because frame rates are lower, giving it more time to process game logic between frames.

The data indicates that this game scales primarily with GPU capability as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU matters more because high frame rates demand faster processing. At 4K, the GPU is the bottleneck, and the CPU has sufficient headroom. Users overclocking or upgrading would see the most benefit from a stronger GPU at 1440p and 4K, while a faster CPU would help at 1080p where frame rates are already high.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, which produces an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the only playable setting at this resolution, and it leaves no margin for error. Users who experience any performance dips will fall below the threshold, so consistent frame times cannot be guaranteed.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 64.9 FPS. This provides a moderate buffer above the 60 FPS threshold and allows for reasonably detailed visuals. Medium and Low also remain playable at 84.6 and 107 FPS respectively, but High offers the best balance between visual quality and performance.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, with an average of 69 FPS. This is the only resolution where the highest preset remains playable, and the 9 FPS margin above the threshold provides some headroom. Users seeking maximum frame rates can drop to Low for 161.3 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended choice for those prioritizing visual fidelity.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database places the Intel Core i5-9400 near several processors with comparable average benchmark scores. The Intel Core i7-1068NG7 scores 2259, which is 0.2 percent higher than the i5-9400's 2254. The Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, 0.4 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, 0.4 percent lower, and the Intel Core i7-10710U scores 2248, 0.3 percent lower. These processors would likely produce similar CPU-bound performance in Evolve, with differences of less than one percent in synthetic benchmarks.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, 0.2 percent higher, making it the closest competitor. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, 0.7 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082, 0.6 percent lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15063, 0.7 percent lower. These GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Evolve, with differences well within the margin of error.

The combination of a CPU and GPU from these rival pools would likely produce similar results to the tested pairing. Users with any of these nearby components can expect analogous performance in this game, with the caveat that the CPU and GPU interact with each other. A stronger GPU paired with the i5-9400 would improve 4K performance, while a stronger CPU paired with the RX 7600 would marginally improve 1080p frame rates. The recorded data shows that the tested combination is well balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with only 4K Ultra remaining out of reach.