Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
166 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
69 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
110 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
49 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
62 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
29 FPS
9.6ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 17,083

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 29 40 49 62
1440p QHD 49 68 88 110
1080p Full HD 69 104 129 166

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 104
1920x1080 Low 166
1920x1080 Medium 129
1920x1080 Ultra 69
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Low 110
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 Ultra 49
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Low 62
3840x2160 Medium 49
3840x2160 Ultra 29

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

Intel Core i5-14600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT form a combination that delivers a wide range of performance across resolutions in Evolve, with the data showing a clear 60 FPS threshold is achievable at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings, while 4K requires reduced graphical fidelity. The measured frame rates indicate that this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p play and solid 1440p gaming, but 4K gaming demands compromises in preset selection to maintain smooth gameplay.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Low, achieving an average of 62.4 FPS. The other presets fall short of the playable threshold: Medium averages 49.3 FPS, High averages 39.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 29.3 FPS. This demonstrates that 4K requires the lowest settings to keep frame rates fluid, and even then the margin above 60 FPS is slim at roughly 2.4 frames.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, with an average of 68.2 FPS. Medium runs at 88.1 FPS and Low reaches 109.5 FPS, both also above the threshold, but High offers the highest visual quality while staying comfortably clear of 60 FPS. Ultra at 1440p falls below the threshold at 49.3 FPS, meaning users must avoid the maximum preset at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the RX 7600 XT and i5-14600KF combination can handle Ultra settings at an average of 68.9 FPS, which is the best playable preset. High runs at 103.8 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, and Low at 166 FPS, all far exceeding the 60 FPS mark. The data shows that 1080p Ultra is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering both maximum visual detail and a frame rate that remains above the playability threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the GPU becomes the dominant constraint as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (166 FPS) and Ultra (68.9 FPS) is substantial, a 97.1 FPS difference, which suggests the GPU is heavily loaded by graphical settings but still has headroom to push high frame rates. The CPU, with its strong multi-core performance, is likely sufficient to feed the GPU at these lower resolutions, as evidenced by the very high frame rates at Low settings.

When moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, with Low at 109.5 FPS, Medium at 88.1 FPS, High at 68.2 FPS, and Ultra at 49.3 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p Low (166 FPS) to 1440p Low (109.5 FPS) is a 34% reduction, indicating that the GPU is becoming more significant. At 4K, the trend accelerates: Low falls to 62.4 FPS, Medium to 49.3 FPS, High to 39.9 FPS, and Ultra to 29.3 FPS. The 4K Low result is nearly identical to the 1440p Ultra result (62.4 vs 49.3 FPS, with the 1440p Ultra being lower), which underscores that resolution scaling has a larger impact than preset scaling at these higher pixel counts.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are more balanced, with the GPU able to push very high frame rates when settings are low. At 1440p, the GPU begins to limit performance more noticeably, and at 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as even Low settings only achieve 62.4 FPS. The i5-14600KF's role becomes less critical as resolution rises, since the GPU workload increases disproportionately, and the benchmark results show the frame rate drops are consistent with GPU-bound behavior rather than CPU limitations.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Evolve at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, which produce an average of 62.4 FPS. Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 49.3, 39.9, and 29.3 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming on this hardware?

A: High settings provide the best balance, averaging 68.2 FPS. Medium and Low are also playable at 88.1 and 109.5 FPS, but Ultra drops to 49.3 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Does the RX 7600 XT handle 1080p Ultra settings well?

A: Yes, the measured average at 1080p Ultra is 68.9 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Lower presets yield even higher frame rates, with High at 103.8 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, and Low at 166 FPS.

Q: How does the i5-14600KF compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49796) by 0.8%.

Q: What GPU alternatives offer similar performance to the RX 7600 XT?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has an average score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT's 17083. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) is 0.3% lower, the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019) is 0.4% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932) is 0.9% lower.

Q: Is Ultra settings playable at any resolution with this setup?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 Ultra averages 68.9 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra averages 49.3 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra averages 29.3 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-14600KF sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores 49228 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (0.4% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995 (0.8% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796 (0.8% higher). These processors would deliver nearly identical gaming performance in Evolve, as the differences are within a single percentage point, meaning users moving between these chips would see negligible frame rate changes.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083 and sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, which is 0.7% higher, making it the closest competitor that would perform slightly better. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019) are 0.3% and 0.4% lower respectively, indicating near-identical performance. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, 0.9% lower. For Evolve specifically, any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few FPS of the RX 7600 XT at each resolution and preset, so users could expect similar playability characteristics.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14600KF combined with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 2386 out of 3700 tested combinations in Evolve. This places the pairing in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is notable given the individual component percentiles: the CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The discrepancy suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor for this game, pulling the overall combo rank down from what the CPU alone would predict. The game's release date of 2015-02-09 means it is not particularly demanding by modern standards, yet the GPU still constrains performance at higher resolutions, as shown by the 4K results where only Low settings achieve playable frame rates.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve, but the playable resolutions and settings depend heavily on the target frame rate of 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the threshold with an average of 62.4 FPS, making 4K playable but visually compromised. At 2560x1440, High settings are the best option at 68.2 FPS, with Medium and Low also playable, but Ultra is not. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra achieving 68.9 FPS, High at 103.8 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, and Low at 166 FPS. For users prioritizing visual quality, 1080p Ultra is the clear choice, while 1440p High offers a good balance of fidelity and performance. 4K gaming is possible only with significant graphical compromises.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low settings deliver 62.4 FPS, Medium delivers 49.3 FPS, High delivers 39.9 FPS, and Ultra delivers 29.3 FPS. No min or max FPS values were recorded for any 4K preset, so these averages represent the only available data points. The spread from Low to Ultra is 33.1 FPS, showing a steep performance penalty for higher presets.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are: Low at 109.5 FPS, Medium at 88.1 FPS, High at 68.2 FPS, and Ultra at 49.3 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 60.2 FPS, indicating that preset selection has a larger impact at this resolution than at 4K. The Ultra result at 1440p matches the Medium result at 4K exactly, both at 49.3 FPS, which illustrates the resolution scaling penalty.

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are: Low at 166 FPS, Medium at 129.3 FPS, High at 103.8 FPS, and Ultra at 68.9 FPS. This is the only resolution where all presets remain above 60 FPS, and the gap between Low and Ultra is 97.1 FPS, the largest spread across all resolutions. The 1080p Low result of 166 FPS is more than double the 4K Ultra result of 29.3 FPS, highlighting the combined impact of resolution and preset on performance. All measured data is recorded as averages only, with no min or max FPS figures provided for any resolution or preset.