Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

68%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
169 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
71 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
113 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
48 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
64 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
9.7ms Frame Time
15ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 21,035

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 39 50 64
1440p QHD 48 69 88 113
1080p Full HD 71 103 131 169

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 103
1920x1080 Low 169
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 Ultra 71
2560x1440 High 69
2560x1440 Low 113
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 Ultra 48
3840x2160 High 39
3840x2160 Low 64
3840x2160 Medium 50
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination delivers a broad range of performance in Evolve, with results that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows a system that can comfortably handle 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K remains demanding, requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. Measured frame rates place this combo at rank 2269 out of 3700 tested configurations, indicating a solid mid-pack placement for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 5050 paired with the i5-13400F produces high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset reaches an average of 169 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this configuration. Medium settings deliver a 131 FPS average with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS, showing a consistent frame time distribution. High settings produce 103 FPS average, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a 71 FPS average. The spread between Low and Ultra is 98 FPS, indicating that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low settings achieve 113 FPS average, a 33% reduction compared to the 1080p Low result. Medium settings drop to 88 FPS average with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS. High settings deliver 69 FPS average, which still clears the 60 FPS threshold comfortably. Ultra settings fall to 48 FPS average, a 32% drop from the 1080p Ultra result of 71 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 75 FPS indicates that even during demanding scenes, frame rates remain well above playable levels.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. Low settings produce a 64 FPS average, barely clearing the playable threshold. Medium settings drop to 50 FPS average with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS, showing noticeable frame time variance. High settings fall to 39 FPS average, and Ultra settings hit 27 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 37 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at this resolution. The Medium preset's minimum of 42 FPS suggests occasional stutters during intense combat sequences.

The frame rate deltas between resolutions reveal a consistent pattern: moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces performance by roughly 20-30% depending on the preset, while the jump from 1440p to 4K costs another 35-45% of frame rate. For example, High settings go from 103 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS at 1440p to 39 FPS at 4K. This scaling indicates that the RTX 5050's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus face increasing pressure as pixel count rises.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering a 71 FPS average. This makes Ultra the recommended setting for players prioritizing visual fidelity at this resolution. The 71 FPS average provides enough headroom above the 60 FPS threshold to absorb minor performance dips without dropping below playable levels.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, producing a 69 FPS average. This setting balances visual quality with performance, staying comfortably above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 88 FPS would provide additional smoothness, but High represents the highest quality tier that maintains playable frame rates. Ultra at 48 FPS falls short of the threshold, making it unsuitable for consistent gameplay at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset clears the 60 FPS bar with a 64 FPS average. This is the sole playable option at 4K, as Medium drops to 50 FPS, High to 39 FPS, and Ultra to 27 FPS. The 64 FPS average at Low settings leaves minimal margin for error, so players should expect occasional dips below 60 FPS in heavy scenes. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this hardware requires accepting significant graphical compromises.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck across all resolutions, but the CPU's influence becomes more apparent at lower settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 169 FPS, which suggests the i5-13400F with its 10 cores and 16 threads can feed the RTX 5050 effectively even at high frame rates. The CPU's 3DMark multi-threaded scores of 7314 (16 threads) and 7307 (max threads) show strong parallel performance, while the single-thread score of 960 indicates adequate per-core capability for game logic.

As resolution increases, the GPU load grows disproportionately. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings reduces frame rates by 33% (169 to 113 FPS), while the same resolution jump at Ultra settings reduces performance by 32% (71 to 48 FPS). This similar relative drop suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in both cases, as the CPU's workload remains constant while the GPU's pixel throughput requirements increase.

The scaling between presets at a fixed resolution further clarifies the component roles. At 1440p, Low to Ultra spans 113 to 48 FPS, a 57% performance range. At 4K, the same preset range spans 64 to 27 FPS, a 58% range. The consistent proportional scaling across resolutions indicates that the RTX 5050's compute resources—2560 shading units and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32—are the determining factor. The CPU's benchmarks, including Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22604 and single-core score of 3191, suggest it has ample headroom even at 1080p where frame rates exceed 100 FPS.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity also plays a role in preset scaling, particularly at 4K where Ultra settings likely exceed the memory buffer, contributing to the 27 FPS result. The 320 GB/s memory bandwidth provides sufficient throughput for 1080p and 1440p, but 4K Ultra textures and effects place heavier demands on the memory subsystem.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 60 FPS on a 1440p monitor?

A: Yes, the High preset at 2560x1440 delivers a 69 FPS average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings provide even higher performance at 88 FPS average, while Ultra falls short at 48 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gaming with this hardware?

A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 3840x2160, producing a 64 FPS average. Medium drops to 50 FPS, so Low is the recommended setting for maintaining smooth gameplay at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5050's average benchmark score of 21035 places it 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713), while the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153 (-0.6% relative to the RTX 5050). The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.6% higher.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Evolve at 1080p?

A: The GPU dominates performance at all resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rate range from Low (169 FPS) to Ultra (71 FPS) shows a 98 FPS spread, indicating the RTX 5050's capabilities determine the outcome. The i5-13400F's benchmarks, including a single-thread score of 960 in 3DMark and 3634 in PassMark, are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 achieves a 131 FPS average with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with minimal frame time variance.

Q: How does this combo rank among tested configurations for Evolve?

A: The combination ranks 2269 out of 3700 tested combos, placing it in the 61st percentile overall. This indicates that while the system performs competently, many other configurations deliver higher frame rates in this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The i5-13400F's nearest rivals in benchmark performance include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with an average score of 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 with 25362 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D with 25365 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H with 25201 (0.4% delta). These CPUs would deliver similar gameplay experiences in Evolve, as their multi-threaded and single-threaded performance falls within a narrow band of the i5-13400F's 25292 average score. The Ryzen 5 5600X3D's 3D V-Cache could offer advantages in cache-sensitive titles, but for Evolve's FPS workload, the differences would be minimal.

For the GPU, the RTX 5050's nearest rivals show a wider performance spread. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, which is 1.6% lower, making it a slightly slower alternative that would produce marginally lower frame rates in Evolve. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153 (-0.6%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237 (-1%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379 (-1.6%). These alternatives would all deliver similar performance levels, with frame rate differences of only a few percent in real-world gaming. The RX 5600 XT's 1.6% deficit would translate to roughly 1-2 FPS difference at 1080p Medium settings and less at higher resolutions where the GPU is more constrained.

The Verdict

The data confirms that this PC can run Evolve effectively, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra achieving 71 FPS average. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this hardware, allowing maximum visual quality without performance compromises.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable across three presets: Low (113 FPS), Medium (88 FPS), and High (69 FPS). The High preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers the best visual quality while maintaining a 69 FPS average. Ultra falls to 48 FPS, making it unsuitable for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.

For 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 64 FPS average. This resolution demands significant graphical sacrifices, and even then, the margin above 60 FPS is slim. Players targeting 4K should expect to play with reduced settings and accept occasional frame rate dips. The verdict is clear: this system excels at 1080p and handles 1440p well, but 4K gaming requires the Low preset to remain playable.