Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 34 | 48 | 60 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 66 | 82 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 63 | 93 | 120 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a clear, resolution-dependent performance story in Evolve, with the data showing that 1080p and 1440p gameplay are well within playable territory, while 4K requires significant graphical compromises to hit the 60 FPS threshold.
FAQ
Q: What is the best graphics preset for this combo at 1920x1080?
A: The Ultra preset is fully playable, averaging 63.2 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that maintains at least 60 FPS at this resolution.
Q: Can this system handle 2560x1440 gaming in Evolve?
A: Yes, the High preset delivers an average of 65.7 FPS at 1440p, making it the best visual option that clears the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this CPU and GPU combination?
A: Only at Low settings, which produces an average of 60.3 FPS. Medium drops to 47.7 FPS, and High falls to 33.7 FPS, so 4K requires the lowest preset for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Evolve?
A: The combination ranks 2783 out of 3700 tested combos, placing it in the lower-mid range of the database for this specific game.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: The Low preset averages 156.2 FPS, while Ultra averages 63.2 FPS, representing a substantial 93 FPS drop for the maximum visual fidelity.
Q: Which component is the bigger bottleneck at 4K resolution?
A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 3840x2160, as the frame rates drop dramatically even with a capable 10-core processor, suggesting the graphics card cannot sustain high settings at this pixel count.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Arc B580 combination sits at rank 2783 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the 75th percentile of all systems evaluated. This mid-pack ranking reflects the pairing of a strong modern CPU with a mid-range GPU, where the processor's 10 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom, but the graphics card's overall performance ceiling becomes evident at higher resolutions.
The CPU itself ranks in the 77th percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25292. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% difference), Intel Core 5 120 (25362, -0.3% difference), and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.3% difference). This indicates the i5-13400F is exceptionally well-balanced within its performance class, trading blows with both mobile flagship chips and desktop gaming-focused processors.
The GPU ranks in the 68th percentile against all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, -0.2% difference), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% difference), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, -0.7% difference). This positioning places the Arc B580 in direct competition with last-generation high-end cards, though the game-specific results show how Evolve's engine interacts with this particular hardware combination.
The gap between the CPU's strong percentile ranking and the GPU's more modest one explains why the combo ranks lower overall. At 1080p, the system performs admirably, but the 4K results drag the overall ranking down, as only 917 other combos perform worse in this specific title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across all three resolutions, with each step down in quality providing a significant boost to average FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance across the board. The Low preset achieves an average of 156.2 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience for competitive play. Medium settings reduce this to 120 FPS, still far above the playability threshold. High settings produce 93.3 FPS, and even the maximum Ultra preset maintains an average of 63.2 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS bar with a slim margin.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low averages 105.6 FPS, which remains excellent for a higher-resolution display. Medium drops to 82.4 FPS, and High comes in at 65.7 FPS, just barely maintaining playable status. Ultra falls below the threshold at 42.8 FPS, making it unusable for smooth gameplay at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become pronounced. Only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 60.3 FPS, essentially right at the threshold. Medium drops to 47.7 FPS, High falls to 33.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 23.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial at 12.6 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs another 14 FPS, indicating the graphics card struggles with the increased pixel count and shader complexity at higher quality settings.
The Verdict
This PC can run Evolve, but the experience varies dramatically by resolution and preset selection. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of playing at Ultra settings with an average of 63.2 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combination, offering the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding option that remains playable, averaging 65.7 FPS. Medium also clears the threshold at 82.4 FPS, and Low reaches 105.6 FPS, but Ultra falls short at 42.8 FPS. Players with 1440p monitors can enjoy good visual fidelity, but must avoid the maximum settings.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold, with an average of 60.3 FPS. Medium produces 47.7 FPS, High drops to 33.7 FPS, and Ultra is unplayable at 23.8 FPS. 4K gaming is technically possible but requires significant graphical concessions, making it the weakest resolution for this hardware combination.
The verdict is clear: this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with headroom for 1440p at high settings, while 4K remains a compromise scenario.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Intel Arc B580. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strength allows the GPU to stretch its legs, with frame rates reaching as high as 156.2 FPS at Low settings. The relatively small gap between Low and Medium at 1080p (36.2 FPS) suggests the GPU is still the primary driver of performance, but the CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads prevent any bottlenecking.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU's workload grows, but the CPU continues to provide adequate support. The scaling from 1080p Low to 1440p Low shows a drop from 156.2 FPS to 105.6 FPS, a 32.4% reduction that aligns with the increased pixel count. This indicates the GPU is becoming more dominant in determining frame rates, while the CPU maintains its role as a capable partner.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The 4K results show a dramatic collapse in performance, particularly at higher presets. The Ultra preset at 4K averages just 23.8 FPS, compared to 63.2 FPS at 1080p Ultra, a 62.3% reduction. This steep decline demonstrates that the Arc B580 simply lacks the raw pixel-pushing power for 4K gaming, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.
The preset scaling also highlights the GPU's role. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 93 FPS, while at 4K, this same comparison shows only a 36.5 FPS difference. This compressed range at high resolution indicates the GPU is saturated, unable to translate additional graphics work into higher frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance and multi-core capabilities, evidenced by its benchmark scores, remain more than sufficient for Evolve's engine at all tested resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 63.2 FPS. This provides the full visual experience while keeping gameplay smooth, with the High preset at 93.3 FPS and Medium at 120 FPS offering additional headroom for those prioritizing frame rate over fidelity.
For 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, averaging 65.7 FPS. This delivers strong visual quality while clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. Medium at 82.4 FPS is a viable alternative for users wanting more performance headroom, while Low at 105.6 FPS prioritizes maximum smoothness.
For 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance, with an average of 60.3 FPS. This is the sole option for 4K gaming with this hardware, offering minimal visual quality but meeting the 60 FPS requirement. Users seeking higher quality at 4K would need to accept frame rates well below the playability threshold, as Medium averages 47.7 FPS and High averages 33.7 FPS.