Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

87%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
261 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
110 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
176 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
73 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
99 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
45 FPS
6.3ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 27,799
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 41,187

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 64 78 99
1440p QHD 73 106 139 176
1080p Full HD 110 158 203 261

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 158
1920x1080 Low 261
1920x1080 Medium 203
1920x1080 Ultra 110
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Low 176
2560x1440 Medium 139
2560x1440 Ultra 73
3840x2160 High 64
3840x2160 Low 99
3840x2160 Medium 78
3840x2160 Ultra 45

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a remarkably consistent performance profile across Evolve’s three tested resolutions, with the data showing a clear pattern: 1080p and 1440p are thoroughly dominated, while 4K requires a modest settings compromise to stay smooth. The measured frame rates reveal a system that scales predictably with both resolution and preset level, offering no surprises but plenty of headroom for high-refresh displays at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional numbers across every preset. The Low setting yields an average of 261.2 FPS, which is the single highest score in the entire dataset. Moving up to Medium drops the average to 203 FPS, still far beyond what any standard 60 Hz or 144 Hz monitor can utilize. The High preset maintains 157.6 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra setting holds an average of 109.7 FPS. These figures suggest the CPU-GPU pair is nowhere near a bottleneck at this resolution; the frame rates are limited primarily by the graphics card’s raw output capability.

At 2560x1440, the same hierarchy persists but with more moderate margins. Low settings produce 175.7 FPS, Medium follows at 139.2 FPS, and High achieves 105.8 FPS. Ultra remains comfortably playable at 73.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 102.4 FPS, compared to 151.5 FPS at 1080p, indicating that resolution scaling applies increasing pressure to the GPU as pixel count rises.

The 3840x2160 results show the first signs of strain. Low settings still manage a strong 99 FPS average, Medium drops to 77.6 FPS, and High dips to 64.1 FPS. Ultra, however, falls below the playable threshold at 44.7 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 54.3 FPS, a much tighter spread than at lower resolutions, which points to the GPU becoming the dominant limiting factor. No min or max FPS values were recorded in the dataset, so all analysis relies solely on average frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals a clear division of labor. At 1920x1080, the frame rates across presets span a wide range—261.2 FPS at Low versus 109.7 FPS at Ultra—which indicates that the graphics card is the primary driver of performance differences. The CPU, an Intel Core i5-12600KF with 10 cores and 16 threads, has ample headroom to feed frames at these rates; its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23391 and single-core score of 3302 confirm substantial processing power that is unlikely to bottleneck older titles like Evolve.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate drop from Low to Ultra is proportionally smaller than at 1080p, suggesting that pixel throughput is starting to saturate the RTX 3080 Ti’s capabilities. The GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are the relevant specs here, and the data shows diminishing returns as settings rise.

At 3840x2160, the CPU’s influence nearly vanishes. The Ultra preset’s 44.7 FPS average is the only sub-60 result in the entire dataset, and the tight 54.3 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates that the GPU is now the sole constraint. The RTX 3080 Ti’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus is sufficient for capacity, but the sheer pixel count at 4K overwhelms its shading units. The CPU’s role at this resolution is reduced to maintaining a stable frame delivery, which its benchmark scores suggest it does without issue.

The preset scaling itself tells a similar story. At every resolution, the jump from Low to Medium yields the largest absolute FPS gain, while the jump from High to Ultra produces the smallest. This non-linear relationship is typical of GPU-bound scenarios where higher settings introduce diminishing returns on visual fidelity versus performance cost.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset at 109.7 FPS is the obvious choice. It is the most demanding setting and still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, leaving 49.7 FPS of headroom. No other preset is necessary for playability; players can max out every option without concern.

At 2560x1440, Ultra again qualifies as the best setting, delivering 73.3 FPS. This is 13.3 FPS above the playable threshold, which provides a comfortable buffer for scene complexity spikes. The High preset at 105.8 FPS is viable for those who prefer higher refresh rates, but the data shows Ultra is fully playable.

The 3840x2160 resolution requires a choice. Ultra falls short at 44.7 FPS, so the most demanding playable preset is High at 64.1 FPS. This sits just 4.1 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold, which is a slim margin. Medium at 77.6 FPS offers more safety and is arguably the better pick for consistent frame pacing, but High is technically within playable bounds. Low at 99 FPS is available for those who prioritize frame rate over fidelity.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 4K with maximum settings?

A: No. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of 44.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings at 64.1 FPS is the highest playable preset at this resolution.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Ultra at 2560x1440 averages 73.3 FPS, making it both the most demanding option and fully playable. It clears the 60 FPS threshold by 13.3 FPS.

Q: How does the 1080p Ultra performance compare to 4K High?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 109.7 FPS, while 3840x2160 High averages 64.1 FPS. The lower resolution offers 45.6 FPS more headroom despite using the more demanding preset.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU dominates. The frame rate spread between Low and Ultra shrinks from 151.5 FPS at 1080p to 54.3 FPS at 4K, showing that the RTX 3080 Ti becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. The i5-12600KF’s benchmark scores suggest it is never the bottleneck.

Q: What is the lowest playable setting at 4K?

A: Low settings at 3840x2160 average 99 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium at 77.6 FPS and High at 64.1 FPS are also playable.

Q: How far above 60 FPS is the 1440p Ultra setting?

A: The 2560x1440 Ultra preset averages 73.3 FPS, which is 13.3 FPS above the playable threshold. This provides moderate headroom for demanding scenes.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing holds rank 859 out of 3700 combos, placing it in the top 23.2% of all tested systems. The CPU’s percentile versus all processors is 79, meaning it outperforms 79% of tested CPUs, while the GPU’s percentile is 83. Both components sit comfortably above average, which aligns with the strong frame rates observed. The rank suggests that while this is not a top-tier extreme setup, it substantially outperforms the majority of tested configurations for Evolve.

The CPU’s nearest rivals reinforce its standing. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872 in average benchmarks, a delta of -0.3% from the i5-12600KF’s 27799 average. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also -0.3% relative, meaning the i5-12600KF trades blows with these older flagship and gaming-focused chips. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE and Ryzen 7 6800U are within 0.3% as well, showing that the i5-12600KF sits in a tightly contested performance band.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3080 Ti’s average benchmark score is 41187. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, scores 40377, a 2% deficit. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 0.8% behind at 40870, while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB is 1.2% ahead at 41707. This clustering indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti’s performance is well-established and reproducible across vendors.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve at all three tested resolutions, but not at every preset. At 1920x1080, every preset clears 60 FPS, with Ultra at 109.7 FPS being fully playable. At 2560x1440, Ultra also clears the threshold at 73.3 FPS, making the entire settings range playable. At 3840x2160, the situation changes: High at 64.1 FPS, Medium at 77.6 FPS, and Low at 99 FPS are all playable, but Ultra at 44.7 FPS is not. The verdict by resolution is straightforward: 1080p and 1440p are fully maxed out, while 4K requires settling for High settings to maintain the 60 FPS target. The margin at 4K High is thin—just 4.1 FPS above the threshold—so players sensitive to frame dips may prefer Medium for its 77.6 FPS average.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i5-12600KF, the nearest rivals in average benchmark score are all within a 0.3% delta. The Intel Core i9-10900K (27872, -0.3%) offers essentially identical CPU performance for Evolve, as does the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (27896, -0.3%). The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE (27712, +0.3%) and AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27887, -0.3%) also fall in the same performance band. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates when paired with the RTX 3080 Ti, assuming no other system bottlenecks.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, the comparable GPUs are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377, 2% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, 0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707, 1.2% higher). The RTX 5070 is the most relevant consumer alternative, being 2% slower on average, which would translate to roughly 2 FPS lower at 4K High (from 64.1 to approximately 62.8) and 2.2 FPS lower at 1440p Ultra (from 73.3 to approximately 71.1). The Tesla M40 24 GB, despite being a datacenter card, benchmarks 1.2% higher, but its driver support and feature set differ from the consumer GeForce line. A system swapping the i5-12600KF for the i9-10900K or the RTX 3080 Ti for the RTX 5070 would behave nearly identically in Evolve, with only single-digit FPS variations at most.