Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

44%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
201 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
135 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
57 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
32 FPS
8.2ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 15,852

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 47 60 77
1440p QHD 57 82 105 135
1080p Full HD 85 122 156 201

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 122
1920x1080 Low 201
1920x1080 Medium 156
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Low 135
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 57
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 Ultra 32

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a highly capable Evolve experience, but the data shows clear boundaries. Across the three tested resolutions, this combo consistently hits the 60 FPS playable threshold at most settings, though the demands of 4K Ultra and 1440p Ultra prove too steep. Benchmark results indicate a system that scales predictably with resolution and preset, favoring high refresh rate play at 1080p while requiring careful settings management at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data for this combo reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system is overwhelmingly strong. Low settings produce an average of 201 FPS, while Medium averages 156 FPS with a minimum of 133 and maximum of 179. High settings drop to a still-excellent 122 FPS average. Ultra, the most demanding preset, maintains an average of 85 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is substantial: 201 FPS down to 85 FPS represents a 58% reduction in average frame rate, but both extremes remain fully playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture changes significantly. Low settings deliver a 135 FPS average, and Medium produces 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 and maximum of 120. High settings still clear the threshold handily at 82 FPS average. However, Ultra drops to 57 FPS average, falling just below the 60 FPS playable line. This represents the first real compromise point: at 1440p, players must choose between High settings at 82 FPS or Ultra at 57 FPS, with no other options reaching the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes steeper. Low settings manage a 77 FPS average, while Medium averages exactly 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 and maximum of 68. High settings fall to 47 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 32 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K is the only non-Low option that remains playable, and it does so by the narrowest margin possible. The jump from Medium to High at 4K costs 13 FPS on average, while the drop from Low to Medium costs 17 FPS. This steep degradation curve indicates that 4K resolution places an outsized burden on the GPU, with each preset tier exacting a larger toll than at lower resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rival data for both components provides context for what similar hardware would achieve. For the Intel Core i3-12100F, the closest matches in average benchmark score are the Intel Core 3 N355 with a delta of 0% and an average score of 13492, and the Intel Core i5-9500 with a delta of 0.3% and an average score of 13452. The Intel Core 5 120UL sits 0.7% lower at 13594, while the Intel Core i7-1250U is 1.1% higher at 13351. These rival CPUs would produce nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Evolve, meaning the frame rate differences between them would be imperceptible in practice.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7700’s nearest rivals cluster within a narrow band. The AMD Radeon R9 370X is 0.1% behind with an average score of 15862, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 1.1% ahead at 15679. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 sits 1% behind at 16014, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% behind at 16129. For Evolve specifically, a system with the RTX 3060 Ti would produce frame rates roughly 1.7% lower across the board, meaning the 4K Medium average of 60 FPS would drop to approximately 59 FPS — just below the playable threshold. Conversely, the Radeon Pro W5500 would deliver marginally higher scores, potentially pushing the 1440p Ultra result from 57 FPS to around 58 FPS, still short of playable.

The percentile rankings reinforce this positioning. The i3-12100F sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 7700 ranks at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This indicates the CPU is comparatively stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, which matters for a game like Evolve where the GPU often becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates in Evolve. At 1920x1080, the CPU and GPU share the workload more evenly. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p costs 116 FPS on average (201 to 85), a drop of 58%. At 2560x1440, the same Low-to-Ultra transition costs 78 FPS (135 to 57), a 58% reduction as well. At 3840x2160, the cost is 45 FPS (77 to 32), a 58% drop. This consistent percentage across all resolutions suggests that preset changes have a proportional impact regardless of resolution, pointing to a balanced workload where both components scale in tandem.

However, the resolution scaling tells a different story. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings costs 40 FPS (122 to 82), a 33% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High costs another 35 FPS (82 to 47), a 43% reduction. The compounding effect of resolution increases indicates the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as pixel count rises. At 1080p, the i3-12100F’s four cores and eight threads at a 3.30 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost clock are sufficient to keep the RX 7700 fed. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus are stretched, and the frame rate collapses even at Medium settings.

The setting scaling further clarifies this. At 1080p, the gap between Medium and High is 34 FPS (156 to 122), while the gap between High and Ultra is 37 FPS (122 to 85). At 1440p, the Medium-to-High gap is 23 FPS (105 to 82), and the High-to-Ultra gap is 25 FPS (82 to 57). At 4K, the Medium-to-High gap is 13 FPS (60 to 47), and the High-to-Ultra gap is 15 FPS (47 to 32). The shrinking absolute gaps at higher resolutions show that the GPU is already near its limits, so preset changes yield diminishing returns in frame rate but still push below playability.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K with Medium settings?

A: Yes, but only marginally. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings is exactly 60, with a minimum of 51 and maximum of 68. This meets the 60 FPS playable threshold, though the minimum frame rate of 51 suggests occasional dips below the target.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming on this combo?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 82 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Ultra at this resolution drops to 57 FPS average, which falls below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti for Evolve?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, a delta of -1.7% for the RX 7700. This means the RTX 3060 Ti would deliver roughly 1.7% higher frame rates in Evolve, which could push the 4K Medium result from 60 FPS to approximately 61 FPS.

Q: Is the i3-12100F a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck at 1080p. The combo achieves 201 FPS at Low settings and 85 FPS at Ultra, suggesting the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient to drive the GPU to high frame rates at this resolution.

Q: What is the worst performing preset across all resolutions?

A: The lowest measured average FPS is 32 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is the only preset across all three resolutions that drops below 50 FPS average, and it falls well short of the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the combo rank high among all tested systems for Evolve?

A: The combo ranks 1720 out of 3700 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the distribution. This rank reflects the balanced nature of the system — capable but not top-tier for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains playable is Ultra, with an average FPS of 85. This preset provides the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin of 25 FPS. Players seeking maximum fidelity at 1080p can enable Ultra without concern.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 82 FPS. Ultra falls to 57 FPS, just below the playable line, so High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution. The 82 FPS average provides headroom above the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is Medium, averaging exactly 60 FPS. This is the only non-Low preset that stays at or above the playable threshold at 4K. Medium achieves this with a minimum of 51 FPS, so players should expect occasional dips below 60 FPS despite the average meeting the threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 1720 out of 3700 tested combinations for Evolve, placing it in the 46.5th percentile of all tested systems. This mid-pack ranking reflects the system’s balanced capabilities. The CPU’s 68th percentile standing among all CPUs is stronger than the GPU’s 58th percentile among all GPUs, suggesting the i3-12100F provides more relative headroom than the RX 7700.

This ranking means the system outperforms roughly 53.5% of tested combos while trailing about 46.5% of them. For a game like Evolve, which was released in 2015, this mid-tier ranking is unsurprising — modern hardware at this level handles the game well at most settings, but top-tier GPUs would push the 4K and 1440p Ultra results into playable territory. The rank also indicates that the i3-12100F’s modest core count is not a significant liability, as the system’s overall position is determined more by the GPU’s performance envelope.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve, but the experience varies sharply by resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the system is fully playable at every preset, from Low at 201 FPS to Ultra at 85 FPS. The verdict is unambiguous: all four settings clear 60 FPS, with Ultra providing the best visual experience at 85 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable at High, Low, and Medium settings, with High delivering 82 FPS as the best option. Ultra at 57 FPS is not playable by the 60 FPS standard. Players at 1440p should stick to High for the optimal combination of quality and performance.

At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium settings are playable. Medium averages exactly 60 FPS, meeting the threshold but with a minimum of 51 FPS, so some stutter is possible. High at 47 FPS and Ultra at 32 FPS are both unplayable. For 4K gaming, players must accept Medium settings or lower, and even then the experience is borderline.

The verdict is that this combo is a strong 1080p and 1440p machine for Evolve, but it struggles at 4K beyond Medium settings. The i3-12100F proves sufficient across the board, while the RX 7700’s performance ceiling becomes evident at higher resolutions. Players prioritizing visual fidelity should target 1440p High, while those with 4K displays should temper expectations to Medium.