Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 39 | 51 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 68 | 90 | 113 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 101 | 127 | 168 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
Can Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT run Evolve? Benchmark data confirms this pairing delivers playable performance across all tested resolutions, though the margin of safety narrows considerably at 4K. The measured results show a clear hierarchy: 1080p is thoroughly playable at every preset, 1440p drops Ultra below the 60 FPS threshold, and 4K requires dropping to Low settings to stay above that line. The following analysis breaks down the exact numbers, component roles, and how this combo stacks against other tested systems.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system posts its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 168.2 FPS, Medium drops to 126.9 FPS, High settles at 100.8 FPS, and Ultra still maintains a comfortable 71.1 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is roughly 97 FPS, indicating that visual quality scaling has a substantial impact on frame rate at this resolution. Every preset clears the 60 FPS playability threshold with headroom, making 1080p the most forgiving environment for this hardware.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales downward predictably. Low settings deliver 112.6 FPS, Medium follows with 89.8 FPS, and High comes in at 68.4 FPS. Ultra, however, falls to 46 FPS — a 22.4 FPS deficit below the 60 FPS line. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 66.6 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 1080p spread but with a lower absolute floor. High settings remain viable, but Ultra is not playable at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings manage 61.4 FPS, barely clearing the threshold. Medium drops to 51.3 FPS, High falls to 39.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.2 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 33.2 FPS, and only the lowest preset achieves playable performance. The data shows diminishing returns: each step up in settings costs roughly 10 FPS on average at this resolution.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent — Low settings provide the highest frame rates, Ultra the lowest, with Medium and High occupying the middle ground. No min or max FPS values are available in the dataset, so the analysis relies entirely on average frame rates. The playable configurations are: 4K Low, 1440p High/Low/Medium, and 1080p all presets.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 4K resolution?
A: Low settings are the only preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at 3840x2160, achieving an average of 61.4 FPS. Medium falls to 51.3 FPS, High drops to 39.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 28.2 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: No. At 2560x1440, Ultra produces an average of 46 FPS, which is 14 FPS below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The highest playable setting at 1440p is High, which averages 68.4 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. It sits within 1.1% of the Intel Core i7-1250U (13351), 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-9500 (13452), and 0.7% below the Intel Core 5 120UL (13594).
Q: What GPU performance tier does the RX 7600 XT occupy?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which scores 17208 (0.7% higher), while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (0.3% lower).
Q: What is the best settings choice for a 1080p display?
A: Ultra settings at 1920x1080 average 71.1 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution, so users can max out visual quality without sacrificing frame rate.
Q: How much headroom exists at 4K Low settings?
A: The margin is thin. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average is 61.4 FPS, just 1.4 FPS above the playability threshold. This leaves minimal room for frame rate dips during intense gameplay sequences.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the only viable option is Low, which delivers 61.4 FPS average. Medium falls short at 51.3 FPS, so there is no room to increase visual quality while maintaining 60 FPS. This configuration sits barely above the threshold, making it a marginal choice for demanding scenes.
At 2560x1440, High is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 68.4 FPS. Medium (89.8 FPS) and Low (112.6 FPS) also qualify, but High provides the best visual quality among playable options. Ultra at 46 FPS is not usable.
At 1920x1080, Ultra is the best choice, averaging 71.1 FPS. This is the highest quality preset tested and it comfortably clears the 60 FPS threshold. High (100.8 FPS), Medium (126.9 FPS), and Low (168.2 FPS) all offer higher frame rates but at reduced visual fidelity.
The data indicates that each resolution has exactly one "best" setting that maximizes quality while staying playable: Low at 4K, High at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p.
Similar Performance Alternatives
On the CPU side, the Intel Core i3-12100F (average benchmark score 13494) is closely matched by several processors. The Intel Core 3 N355 scores 13492, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-9500 scores 13452, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594, 0.7% higher. The Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351, 1.1% lower. All four rivals fall within roughly 1% of the i3-12100F's average benchmark score, meaning any of them would deliver near-identical CPU-bound performance in Evolve.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (average benchmark score 17083) has three close comparables. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, just 0.3% lower, while the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 scores 17208, 0.7% higher. These deltas are all under 1%, so swapping the RX 7600 XT for any of these cards would produce nearly the same frame rates in this game, assuming no other bottleneck.
A system built with any of these CPU rivals paired with any of these GPU rivals would behave almost identically to the i3-12100F + RX 7600 XT combo. The benchmark scores suggest the GPU is the more consequential component for Evolve, given the wider range of measured FPS across resolutions and settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how the balance shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the dominant factor. Frame rates scale steeply with settings — from 168.2 FPS at Low to 71.1 FPS at Ultra — indicating the GPU is doing most of the work. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower settings, where the frame rate ceiling is high.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's load increases, and the gap between Low (112.6 FPS) and Ultra (46 FPS) widens to 66.6 FPS. The CPU remains less stressed, as the slower frame rates at higher settings give it more time to process game logic. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily saturated. Low settings produce 61.4 FPS, while Ultra drops to 28.2 FPS. The CPU's role diminishes further because the GPU is the limiting factor across all presets. The 4K results show that the GPU's 16 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the workload, but the compute throughput (22.57 TFLOPS FP32) is not enough to maintain high frame rates at max settings.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: the GPU limits performance at higher settings and resolutions, while the CPU provides adequate support throughout. The i3-12100F's 4 cores and 8 threads with a 12 MB L3 cache are sufficient for Evolve, as evidenced by the playable frame rates at 1440p High and 1080p Ultra. The CPU's 68th percentile ranking among all processors suggests it is not a bottleneck in this pairing.
The Verdict
Yes, this system can run Evolve, with caveats depending on display resolution and quality preferences. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, including Ultra at 71.1 FPS. This is the ideal environment for this hardware. At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 68.4 FPS, Medium and Low are also playable, but Ultra falls to 46 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low settings clear the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 61.4 FPS — a thin margin that may produce occasional dips below 60 in heavy scenes.
The verdict data confirms these findings: 1080p lists Ultra as the best playable setting (71.1 FPS), 1440p lists High (68.4 FPS), and 4K lists Low (61.4 FPS). Users targeting 4K should accept Low settings or lower the resolution. Those at 1440p can enjoy High quality. At 1080p, the full visual experience is available.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination ranks 2385th out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the 35th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly two-thirds of tested configurations outperform it. The rank reflects the CPU's modest 4-core/8-thread configuration and the GPU's mid-range positioning (60th percentile among GPUs).
However, the rank does not tell the full story. The measured FPS data shows this combo handles Evolve well at 1080p and acceptably at 1440p, with only 4K Ultra being unplayable. The 2385th rank likely reflects the wide field of higher-end GPUs and CPUs in the database, not a fundamental weakness in this pairing. For a mainstream system, the performance is adequate for the game's requirements, and the 68th percentile CPU ranking confirms the processor is not a limiting factor. The GPU's 60th percentile ranking is the more relevant metric for Evolve, and it is sufficient for 1080p Ultra and 1440p High gameplay.