Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 58 | 74 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 71 | 102 | 130 | 168 |
| 1080p Full HD | 106 | 153 | 195 | 251 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a highly capable Evolve experience, with the data showing playable performance at 4K and exceptional headroom at lower resolutions. The measured results indicate that this system clears the 60 FPS threshold at 4K only on Medium settings or lower, while 1440p and 1080p allow for maximum Ultra presets with substantial margin. The core finding is that the RTX 3080, paired with the Ryzen 9 9900X3D, is a 1440p-centric powerhouse for this title, with 4K requiring a modest settings compromise.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160 (4K), the data shows a clear performance hierarchy across presets. The Ultra preset yields an average of 40 FPS, which falls well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings improve the average to 58 FPS, still marginally under the threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 74 FPS, with a minimum of 63 FPS and a maximum of 85 FPS, providing a consistent experience above the target. The Low preset delivers the highest average at 96 FPS. The progression from Ultra to Low represents a 56 FPS swing, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), every preset clears the 60 FPS bar. The Ultra preset averages 71 FPS, comfortably above the threshold. High settings reach 102 FPS, while Medium produces 130 FPS with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. The Low preset peaks at 168 FPS average. The step from Ultra to High adds 31 FPS, and from High to Medium adds another 28 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings drop. The minimum recorded FPS of 111 FPS at Medium indicates strong frame pacing.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system demonstrates its highest performance levels. Ultra settings average 106 FPS, which is the most demanding preset tested at this resolution. High settings reach 153 FPS, Medium averages 195 FPS with a minimum of 165 FPS and a maximum of 224 FPS, and Low produces 251 FPS average. The gap between Ultra and Low is 145 FPS, highlighting the scaling efficiency of the RTX 3080 at lower pixel counts. All presets at 1080p provide well over double the playable threshold, making the choice purely about visual fidelity versus refresh rate headroom.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a shifting balance between CPU and GPU influence depending on resolution. At 3840x2160, the performance delta between Low and Ultra presets is 56 FPS (from 96 to 40), which is a 140% increase in frame rate when dropping to the lowest settings. This large scaling indicates that the GPU workload dominates the frame time, as reducing pixel count and shading complexity directly translates to massive FPS gains. The CPU’s role at 4K is secondary, as it is capable of feeding frames well above the GPU’s output limit.
At 2560x1440, the scaling from Ultra to Low is 97 FPS (from 71 to 168), a 137% improvement. The absolute FPS values are higher than 4K, but the relative scaling is similar, suggesting the GPU remains the main driver. However, the fact that Ultra still hits 71 FPS implies the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is not bottlenecking; the CPU has enough headroom to push the GPU to its limits at this resolution.
At 1920x1080, the scaling from Ultra to Low is 145 FPS (from 106 to 251), a 137% increase. While the GPU still scales strongly, the absolute numbers—especially the 251 FPS Low average—suggest that the CPU is more involved. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s high single-thread performance (evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1269 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4646) ensures that frame generation is not CPU-limited. The data shows that at 1080p, the combination is balanced, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU at high rates, while at 4K the GPU’s pixel throughput is the limiting factor.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 74 FPS. The High preset falls short at 58 FPS, so Medium is the optimal choice for 4K playability. The Low preset is also playable at 96 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual experience while still maintaining a 14 FPS buffer above the threshold.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best settings choice, as it averages 71 FPS. This is the highest quality preset tested, and it clears the 60 FPS bar by 11 FPS. All other presets (High at 102 FPS, Medium at 130 FPS, Low at 168 FPS) are also playable, but Ultra provides the maximum visual fidelity without dropping below the target.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear winner, averaging 106 FPS. This is the most demanding preset, and it provides a 46 FPS buffer above the threshold. The data shows that at 1080p, the system can run the game at maximum settings with high confidence, as the average FPS is well above the playable mark.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 40, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable preset at 4K is Medium, which averages 74 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 71 FPS, making it the best choice for maximum visual quality while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. This provides a smooth experience without needing to compromise on settings.
Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS increases from 106 on Ultra to 251 on Low, a 145 FPS gain. This represents a 137% improvement, making Low the best option for high-refresh-rate displays, though Ultra still provides a solid 106 FPS.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 the limiting factor at 4K?
A: The data suggests yes. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 3840x2160 is 56 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s rendering workload heavily dictates performance. The CPU’s high benchmark scores (e.g., cinebench_r23_multicore of 47737) indicate it is not the bottleneck.
Q: Does the system maintain a stable frame rate at Medium settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average FPS is 74, with a minimum of 63 and a maximum of 85. The minimum is still above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating stable frame pacing.
Q: How does the system perform at 1080p on Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the average FPS is 195, with a minimum of 165 and a maximum of 224. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a highly responsive experience with room for higher refresh rates.
The Verdict
The data confirms that this PC can run Evolve effectively, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. At 3840x2160, the system is playable on Low and Medium presets, with Medium being the best choice at 74 FPS average. The High preset at 58 FPS and Ultra at 40 FPS are not playable. At 2560x1440, the system is fully playable on all presets, with Ultra delivering 71 FPS average as the best settings option. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, and Ultra is the best choice at 106 FPS average. The verdict is that this hardware is best suited for 1440p gaming with maximum settings, while 4K requires a settings reduction to Medium for a smooth experience. The 1080p results indicate significant headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even Ultra settings exceed 100 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the nearest rivals in benchmark performance are the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which has an average score of 55093 and is -0.6% slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s average of 54762. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, which is 1.3% slower. The Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Core i7-14700F are also close, with scores of 53701 and 53620, respectively, representing 2% and 2.1% performance gaps. These CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Evolve, as the game’s performance is not heavily dependent on the CPU at higher resolutions.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 3080’s average benchmark score of 23172 include the NVIDIA P106-100 with an average score of 23249 (-0.3% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (-0.4%). These GPUs would deliver similar FPS figures in Evolve, meaning that users with these alternatives should expect comparable performance at each resolution and preset. The deltaPct values are all within 0.4%, indicating that the RTX 3080 and these rivals are effectively equivalent in this game’s workload.