Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 36 | 46 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 63 | 80 | 104 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 94 | 120 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a specific performance profile in Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. Measured data indicates that this combination is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and graphical demands increase. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy across the three tested resolutions, with 1080p delivering a consistently smooth experience, 1440p remaining highly playable, and 4K presenting significant challenges at higher presets.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates its strongest performance. The Low preset yields an average of 155 FPS, providing a massive headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 120 FPS, with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 138 FPS, indicating excellent frame pacing and stability. The High preset still delivers a robust 94 FPS average. The most demanding setting, Ultra, maintains an average of 65 FPS, which is only 5 FPS above the playability threshold, but still technically playable.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. The Low preset achieves an average of 104 FPS, which is a 33% reduction compared to the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce an 80 FPS average, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS; this frame range shows that even in demanding scenes, the experience remains fluid. The High preset averages 63 FPS, which is just past the 60 FPS line but remains the highest playable preset at this resolution. The Ultra preset falls below the threshold, averaging only 44 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the data shows a significant drop in capability. The Low preset is the only setting that approaches playability, with an average of 59 FPS—one frame short of the 60 FPS target. Medium settings average 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53, showing noticeable dips. The High preset averages 36 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages just 25 FPS. No settings at this resolution clear the 60 FPS threshold, making 4K effectively unplayable for smooth gameplay.
The scaling pattern across resolutions is consistent. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 90 FPS, while at 1440p the difference narrows to 60 FPS, and at 4K it shrinks to 34 FPS. This indicates that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, compressing the performance gap between presets.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1920x1080?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 1080p Ultra is 65 FPS, which is 5 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the highest preset that achieves playable performance at this resolution.
Q: What is the best playable preset at 2560x1440?
A: The High preset is the most demanding setting that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 63 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short, averaging only 44 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset averages 59 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 46 FPS, and higher presets drop further, so no settings are considered playable.
Q: How does the GPU's performance relative to its rivals affect gameplay?
A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scores 22895, which is 0.6% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, only 0.2% higher. This suggests the Arc B580 performs on par with these cards, meaning gameplay experience would be similar.
Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking, and does it bottleneck the GPU?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54762. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, a difference of -0.6%. Given this high ranking, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in this game.
Q: Are the minimum FPS values for Medium settings consistent with the average?
A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS values are 102 at 1080p, 68 at 1440p, and 39 at 4K. These minimums are 15-18% lower than the respective averages, indicating some frame drops but not severe stuttering.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that maintains an average of 65 FPS, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by 5 frames. This delivers the highest visual quality while remaining playable. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, averaging 63 FPS. While this is close to the threshold, the data shows it stays above 60 FPS. For 3840x2160, no preset achieves playable performance; the Low preset comes closest with an average of 59 FPS, but since it is below the 60 FPS target, there is no recommended setting at this resolution.
The performance margin at the best settings is consistent. At 1080p Ultra, the 65 FPS average provides a small buffer, while at 1440p High, the 63 FPS average is even tighter. If frame drops occur, users may need to drop to the next lower preset at 1440p, but the measured data does not include minimum FPS values for High settings, so the stability is not fully characterized.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have a set of nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores. For the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, the closest competitor is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093, a mere 0.6% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, a 1.3% difference, and the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, a 2% difference. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, 2.1% lower. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Evolve, as the game is not likely to be CPU-bound given the GPU's performance level.
For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, with a score of 23061, which is 0.2% higher. This effectively places the two cards at parity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, 1% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, meaning that swapping the Arc B580 for any of these GPUs would yield very similar FPS results in Evolve, with differences of only a few frames at most.
When considering a complete system swap, a user with a Ryzen 9 9900X3D and an RTX 3080 would see near-identical performance to the tested combo, as the GPU delta is only 0.7%. Similarly, pairing the CPU with an RX 580 2048SP would produce almost the same results, highlighting that the tested configuration sits in a well-populated performance tier.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2787 out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve. This places the combo in the 75th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the hardware combinations tested. However, the rank also indicates that a significant number of combos deliver higher frame rates, likely those with more powerful GPUs.
The rank of 2787 out of 3700 suggests that while this combo is capable of running Evolve well at 1080p and 1440p, it is not a top-tier performer. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's high percentile ranking (91st) is not enough to overcome the GPU's mid-range position (68th percentile). The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 is modest compared to high-end cards, which explains why the combo does not rank higher.
The Verdict
This PC can run Evolve, but the playable experience depends entirely on the chosen resolution. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on all four presets: Low (155 FPS), Medium (120 FPS), High (94 FPS), and Ultra (65 FPS). This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for this combo, offering smooth gameplay even at maximum settings.
At 2560x1440, the system remains playable on three presets: Low (104 FPS), Medium (80 FPS), and High (63 FPS). The Ultra preset is not playable, averaging 44 FPS. Users willing to sacrifice some visual fidelity can still enjoy a fluid experience at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any setting. The Low preset averages 59 FPS, which is technically below the 60 FPS threshold, and all other presets fall well short. For 4K gaming, a more powerful GPU would be required. The verdict is clear: 1080p and 1440p are viable, but 4K is not.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Evolve. At 1920x1080, the CPU's high performance is evident, as the combo achieves 155 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the GPU is not heavily taxed. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is a 58% reduction in FPS (from 155 to 65), which shows that the GPU becomes more relevant as settings increase, but the CPU still has headroom.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more prominent. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p on Low settings is 33% (from 155 to 104), and on Medium it is 33% (from 120 to 80). This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, as the CPU's frame generation capability is not the limiting factor. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking supports this, as it is unlikely to be the constraint.
At 3840x2160, the GPU dominates the performance picture. The drop from 1440p to 4K on Low settings is 43% (from 104 to 59), and on Medium it is 43% (from 80 to 46). The GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are insufficient for the demands of 4K, leading to the sub-60 FPS results. The CPU's role is minimal at this resolution, as even its top-tier performance cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations.
The preset scaling reinforces this analysis. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 90 FPS, indicating the GPU has significant headroom. At 1440p, this difference narrows to 60 FPS, and at 4K it is 34 FPS. This compression of the preset performance gap as resolution increases confirms that the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates, with the CPU providing a solid foundation that does not bottleneck at any resolution.