Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 65 | 83 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 114 | 145 | 188 |
| 1080p Full HD | 118 | 170 | 217 | 280 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers a decisive performance profile for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. Benchmark data shows this pairing is capable of high refresh rates at 1440p and 1080p, while maintaining playability at 4K with adjusted settings. The data indicates a strong CPU (92nd percentile) paired with a robust GPU (82nd percentile), resulting in a system that handles Evolve’s demands across all tested resolutions, with the primary bottleneck shifting between components depending on the resolution and preset.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest settings preset that maintains an average FPS above 60 at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the High preset achieves an average of 65 FPS, making it the most demanding playable setting. The Medium preset runs at 83 FPS, while Low reaches 107 FPS, and Ultra falls below the threshold at 45 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, scores 58323, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i9-14900 is 0.5% behind, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is 0.7% ahead.
Q: Does the RTX 5070 outperform its closest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 5070’s average benchmark score is 40377. It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318) by 0.1% and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063) by 0.8%. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870) by 1.2% and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568) by 2.0%.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 280 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 118 FPS. This represents a significant 162 FPS drop when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.
Q: Is the system more dependent on the CPU or GPU at higher resolutions?
A: The data shows a shift in bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU’s strength (single-thread score of 4704) allows for extremely high frame rates (280 FPS on Low). At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the Ultra preset drops to 45 FPS, indicating the graphics card’s workload is the primary constraint.
Q: How many total system combinations were ranked for this game?
A: This specific combination (Ryzen 7 9850X3D + RTX 5070) ranks 758th out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve, placing it in the top 20.5% of all systems evaluated.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates CPU-bound characteristics. The transition from Low (280 FPS) to Ultra (118 FPS) shows a 162 FPS spread, but even the most demanding preset exceeds 60 FPS by a wide margin. This suggests the CPU’s high single-thread performance (4704 in Passmark) is sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, preventing a graphics-side bottleneck.
Moving to 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The Ultra preset still maintains a healthy 79 FPS, but the scaling from 1080p Ultra (118 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (79 FPS) represents a 33% reduction. This indicates the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility, though the CPU still provides ample headroom. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 124 at 1440p confirms that the processor can sustain high frame delivery even when the GPU is working harder.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The Ultra preset falls to 45 FPS, below the playable threshold, while High manages 65 FPS. The gap between Low (107 FPS) and High (65 FPS) at 4K is 42 FPS, a smaller absolute difference than at 1080p, but the performance ceiling is clearly dictated by the RTX 5070’s rendering capacity. The CPU’s role diminishes as resolution increases, with the graphics card’s fill rate and memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s) becoming the limiting factors. The data suggests that for 4K Ultra, the RTX 5070’s 12 GB GDDR7 memory and 80 ROPs are insufficient for Evolve’s highest settings, whereas the CPU is never the primary constraint at any resolution tested.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The data shows a wide range of performance across presets. Low settings produce an average of 280 FPS, which is exceptionally high. Medium settings average 217 FPS, with a minimum of 184 FPS and a maximum of 249 FPS. High settings drop to 170 FPS average. Ultra settings average 118 FPS. Even the lowest recorded value (Medium’s 184 FPS) is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that this resolution is purely a matter of preference between visual fidelity and refresh rate headroom.
2560x1440: Performance remains strong. Low settings average 188 FPS. Medium settings average 145 FPS, with a range of 124 to 167 FPS. High settings average 114 FPS. Ultra settings average 79 FPS. The minimum FPS observed at Medium (124 FPS) is still more than double the playable threshold, suggesting consistent frame delivery even during demanding scenes. The step from High to Ultra at this resolution costs 35 FPS on average, a noticeable but acceptable trade-off for higher detail.
3840x2160: This resolution presents the most significant challenges. Low settings average 107 FPS, which remains fluid. Medium settings average 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. High settings average 65 FPS, just above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings average 45 FPS, falling below the playable target. The data indicates that 4K requires a careful choice of settings, as the gap between High (65 FPS) and Ultra (45 FPS) is a 20 FPS drop, pushing the system out of the comfortable range.
The Verdict
The data confirms that this PC can run Evolve effectively across all tested resolutions, provided settings are chosen appropriately. At 1920x1080, every preset—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 118 FPS. This makes 1080p a fully playable experience at maximum detail. At 2560x1440, the same is true: all four presets maintain averages above 60 FPS, with Ultra at 79 FPS. This resolution offers an ideal balance of visual quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the system remains playable but requires more conservative settings. The High preset averages 65 FPS, clearing the threshold, while Low (107 FPS) and Medium (83 FPS) also qualify. The Ultra preset fails to meet the 60 FPS requirement, averaging 45 FPS. The verdict is clear: for 4K gaming, users must select High or lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. In summary, the combination is capable of running Evolve at 60 FPS or higher at 1080p and 1440p on all settings, and at 4K on High, Medium, or Low settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which achieves an average of 65 FPS. This provides a solid 4K experience with high detail, though users seeking higher frame rates can opt for Medium (83 FPS) or Low (107 FPS). Ultra is not recommended at this resolution due to its 45 FPS average.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 79 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality while maintaining comfortable performance headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Lower presets offer even higher frame rates, but Ultra represents the optimal balance of fidelity and speed.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the recommended choice, with an average of 118 FPS. This ensures a fully maxed-out visual experience while still providing a frame rate well above 60 FPS, suitable for high refresh rate monitors. The data shows no need to compromise on settings at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves significant performance on the table.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 758th out of 3700 tested system configurations for Evolve. This places the pairing in the 79.5th percentile of all tested combos, indicating a strong overall performer. The rank reflects both the CPU’s high standing among processors (92nd percentile) and the GPU’s solid position among graphics cards (82nd percentile). Given that Evolve is a 2015 title, this modern hardware combination significantly exceeds the game’s requirements, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The rank suggests that while there are faster systems available, this configuration provides a well-above-average experience for this specific game.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D performs similarly to several other processors. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M has an average score of 58323, a 0.1% difference, making it the closest match. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, a 0.2% difference, offering nearly identical performance. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, a 0.5% difference, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 58826, a 0.7% difference. In gaming scenarios, these CPUs would likely produce similar frame rates in CPU-bound situations, though the 9850X3D’s 96 MB L3 cache may offer specific advantages in cache-sensitive workloads.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070’s closest rivals are all AMD professional cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318, a 0.1% difference, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, a 1.2% difference, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, a 2.0% difference. These alternatives would provide comparable graphics performance in Evolve, though the RTX 5070’s 12 GB GDDR7 memory and modern architecture (Blackwell 2.0) may offer better driver optimization for gaming. Users with these alternative GPUs could expect similar average FPS in the measured presets, with minor variations depending on specific driver and thermal behavior.