Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 50 | 64 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 88 | 112 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 131 | 167 | 215 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a wide range of performance in Evolve, scaling from a smooth 1440p experience to a demanding 4K challenge. Measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets show a system that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a preset compromise. The data indicates that the RTX 3070, a 61st-percentile GPU, becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the 92nd-percentile CPU maintains sufficient headroom.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces frame rates well above the playable threshold across all presets. The Low preset averages 215 FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 167 FPS, with a minimum of 142 FPS and a maximum of 192 FPS. High settings yield 131 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration, still maintains an average of 91 FPS. No minimum or maximum values were recorded for the Low, High, or Ultra presets at this resolution, but the averages alone indicate a substantial performance buffer.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show a clear step down from 1080p. The Low preset averages 144 FPS, a 33% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings produce 112 FPS on average, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS. High settings average 88 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The data shows a consistent scaling pattern: each preset tier at 1440p reduces the average FPS by roughly 20-25% compared to 1080p, with the Ultra preset experiencing the largest relative drop.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 3070 begins to struggle with the higher-end presets. The Low preset averages 82 FPS, which is still comfortably playable. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS; the minimum dips below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating occasional stutter during intense scenes. High settings average 50 FPS, which falls short of the playable threshold. The Ultra preset averages just 35 FPS, the lowest recorded value in the entire dataset. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: the High preset drops from 88 FPS to 50 FPS (a 43% reduction), and the Medium preset drops from 112 FPS to 64 FPS (a 43% reduction as well). This suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth and raw throughput are the limiting factors at 4K.
The measured data includes minimum and maximum values only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the range is 142-192 FPS, a spread of 50 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range narrows to 95-129 FPS, a spread of 34 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 54-73 FPS, a spread of 19 FPS. The narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates that frame pacing becomes more consistent as the GPU becomes the bottleneck, but the minimum values at 4K fall below the 60 FPS threshold, which is a concern for sustained gameplay.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate this system can achieve in Evolve?
A: The highest recorded average is 215 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the only setting in the dataset that exceeds 200 FPS.
Q: At which resolution and preset does the system first drop below the 60 FPS playable threshold?
A: At 3840x2160 with the High preset, the average FPS drops to 50, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 4K averages 64 FPS but has a minimum of 54 FPS, so the High preset is the first configuration where the average falls below the threshold.
Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 91 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 61 FPS, which is just above the threshold. At 4K, Ultra averages 35 FPS, which is the lowest recorded value in the dataset.
Q: What is the frame rate range at 1440p Medium settings?
A: The average is 112 FPS, with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS. This is the only 1440p preset with recorded minimum and maximum values.
Q: Does the system maintain 60 FPS at 4K with any preset?
A: Yes, the Low preset averages 82 FPS and the Medium preset averages 64 FPS. However, the Medium preset has a minimum of 54 FPS, so the Low preset is the only 4K configuration where the average and minimum both stay above 60 FPS.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same preset?
A: At Low settings, the average drops from 215 FPS to 82 FPS, a 62% reduction. At Medium settings, the average drops from 167 FPS to 64 FPS, a 62% reduction as well. At High settings, the average drops from 131 FPS to 50 FPS, a 62% reduction. At Ultra settings, the average drops from 91 FPS to 35 FPS, a 62% reduction.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average of 64 FPS. However, the minimum FPS for this preset is 54, which means there will be moments where the frame rate dips below the threshold. The Low preset at 4K averages 82 FPS and is the safer choice for consistent performance, but Medium is the highest preset that clears the 60 FPS average requirement.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 61 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it maintains an average just above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 1440p averages 88 FPS and would provide a larger margin for error, but the data shows that Ultra is technically playable.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 91 FPS, which is the best possible setting at this resolution. The system has ample headroom at 1080p, so there is no need to compromise on visual quality. The High preset averages 131 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended choice for the highest fidelity while remaining far above the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
This system can run Evolve, and the verdict depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the combination of the Ryzen 7 9850X3D and RTX 3070 delivers playable performance at every preset, with the Ultra preset averaging 91 FPS. This is the best-case scenario, providing a high-refresh-rate experience with maximum settings.
At 2560x1440, the system remains fully playable across all presets. The Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold, and lower presets provide progressively higher frame rates. The data shows that 1440p Ultra is a viable option, though the margin above the threshold is slim. Players seeking a more comfortable buffer could use High settings at 88 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system is only partially playable. The Low preset averages 82 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 64 FPS, but the minimum for Medium falls to 54 FPS. High and Ultra presets fall below the threshold, averaging 50 FPS and 35 FPS respectively. The verdict for 4K is that the system can run the game, but only at medium or lower settings, and even then, frame pacing may be inconsistent.
The overall verdict is that this PC is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Evolve, with the ability to max out settings at both resolutions. For 4K, the system requires a significant preset compromise and does not deliver a consistently smooth experience at medium settings.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Evolve. At 1920x1080, the CPU's performance is a significant factor, as the frame rates are high enough that the GPU is not fully saturated. The Ryzen 7 9850X3D, with 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample processing power, and the scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 58% reduction in frame rate (from 215 FPS to 91 FPS), which indicates that the GPU is still the primary driver of performance even at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. The frame rates drop by approximately 33% compared to 1080p at every preset, which is a larger reduction than the resolution scaling alone would suggest. The RTX 3070's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the limiting factors, as the increased pixel count requires more memory throughput. The CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the fact that the Ultra preset at 1440p averages 61 FPS, only 1 FPS above the threshold.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck. The frame rates drop by another 43% from 1440p, and the Ultra preset falls to 35 FPS. The CPU's performance is largely irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K. The scaling pattern across resolutions—62% reduction from 1080p to 4K at every preset—confirms that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining performance.
The preset scaling within each resolution also highlights the GPU's role. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 124 FPS (from 215 to 91), a 58% drop. At 1440p, the difference is 83 FPS (from 144 to 61), a 58% drop. At 4K, the difference is 47 FPS (from 82 to 35), a 57% drop. The consistency of this percentage across resolutions indicates that the GPU's workload scales uniformly with preset quality, and the CPU is not introducing any additional bottlenecks.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 1580 out of 3700 combinations in Evolve. This places it in the 43rd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 43% of the systems tested. The rank is based on measured FPS data across all resolutions and presets, and it reflects the system's balanced but not exceptional performance in this game.
The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile among all tested CPUs, indicating that it is a high-performing processor. However, the GPU ranks in the 61st percentile, which is below the CPU's standing. This discrepancy suggests that the overall combo rank is limited by the GPU, and that a more powerful graphics card would significantly improve the system's standing. The combination's average benchmark score of 17208 for the GPU and 58386 for the CPU further illustrates this gap, with the GPU's score being a smaller fraction of the CPU's score.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M has an average score of 58323, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 7 9850X3D. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, 0.5% lower, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, 0.2% higher. These CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Evolve, with differences of less than 1% in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 58826, 0.7% higher, making it a marginally faster alternative.
For the GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average score of 17083, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 3070. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037, 1% higher, and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019, 1.1% higher. The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468, which is 1.5% lower than the RTX 3070. These alternatives would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the RTX 3070 in Evolve, meaning a user swapping to any of these GPUs would see a negligible change in performance.
In practical terms, a system with the Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with an RX 7600 XT would deliver nearly identical results to the tested configuration, with the differences in benchmark scores translating to less than a 1% variation in FPS. The same applies to the CPU alternatives; the i9-14900 or Xeon w5-2545 would not materially change the gaming experience in Evolve. The data suggests that this combo sits in a tight cluster of similar-performing hardware, and the choice between these components would come down to factors other than raw performance in this specific game.