Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

52%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
89 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
37 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
60 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
25 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
34 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
14 FPS
18.5ms Frame Time
28ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 39,768
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 14 21 26 34
1440p QHD 25 36 46 60
1080p Full HD 37 54 69 89

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 54
1920x1080 Low 89
1920x1080 Medium 69
1920x1080 Ultra 37
2560x1440 High 36
2560x1440 Low 60
2560x1440 Medium 46
2560x1440 Ultra 25
3840x2160 High 21
3840x2160 Low 34
3840x2160 Medium 26
3840x2160 Ultra 14

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

Evolve, a 2015 FPS title, places heavy demands on the rendering pipeline, and the combination of an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D with an Intel Arc B390 produces a wide spread of results depending on resolution and settings. The recorded data shows that this system is highly sensitive to both parameters, with performance ranging from a smooth 89 FPS at 1080p Low down to a stutter-prone 14 FPS at 4K Ultra. The Intel Arc B390, an integrated-class GPU with a 9th percentile rank among all GPUs, is the primary constraint in this pairing. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, sitting in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, provides ample headroom that the GPU cannot fully exploit at higher resolutions and quality presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the database records no playable settings for this combo. Every preset tested falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS does not exist at this resolution. The closest result comes from Low settings, which produce an average of 34 FPS, still far short of the 60 FPS target. Ultra settings at 4K yield only 14 FPS, High produces 21 FPS, and Medium reaches 26 FPS. None of these configurations are viable for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves slightly. The only playable preset is Low, which records an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the most demanding setting that clears the playable threshold at this resolution. Medium settings drop to 46 FPS, High falls to 36 FPS, and Ultra manages only 25 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p gaming with this hardware requires accepting the lowest visual quality preset.

At 1920x1080, the system finds its best balance. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 69 FPS. Low settings run at 89 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the threshold. High settings drop to 54 FPS, just below the 60 FPS target, while Ultra falls to 37 FPS. For the best visual quality that remains playable, Medium at 1080p is the recommended configuration.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, based on average benchmark scores, include several processors that would behave similarly in this game. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 39,603, a delta of 0.4% from the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 39,768 average. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40,048, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485, 0.7% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 scores 40,081, 0.8% higher. In Evolve, these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates when paired with the same GPU, as the game's performance is heavily GPU-bound at most settings.

For the Intel Arc B390, the nearest rivals are all older NVIDIA discrete GPUs, and the deltas are larger in relative terms. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1,463, which is 1.3% lower than the Arc B390's 1,482 average. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1,460, 1.5% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1,446, 2.5% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1,443, 2.7% lower. These GPUs would produce similar performance in Evolve, meaning the overall experience with any of them would be constrained by the same GPU limits observed in this testing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured results show a clear hierarchy of performance across the four presets. Low settings produce an average of 34 FPS. Medium settings drop to 26 FPS, with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS. High settings produce 21 FPS. Ultra settings produce 14 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 20 FPS, indicating that the GPU is heavily overloaded at this resolution regardless of quality level.

At 2560x1440, the results scale more dramatically with settings. Low settings hit exactly 60 FPS on average. Medium settings produce 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS. High settings drop to 36 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 25 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 35 FPS, showing that the GPU has diminishing returns as quality increases, but the low preset remains the only playable option.

At 1920x1080, the full range of playable configurations appears. Low settings reach 89 FPS. Medium settings produce 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. High settings drop to 54 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 37 FPS. The minimum of 59 FPS at Medium is notable because it sits just one frame below the 60 FPS threshold, meaning occasional dips below the target are possible even at this playable preset.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, none of the tested presets reach 60 FPS. The best result is 34 FPS at Low settings, and Ultra settings produce only 14 FPS.

Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390 scores 1,482 in the recorded benchmark. It is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, 2.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9800X3D a bottleneck in this system for Evolve?

A: The CPU is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B390 ranks in the 9th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU is the primary constraint.

Q: What are the recorded FPS numbers at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average is 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 FPS and a maximum of 53 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: This pairing ranks 3,288 out of 3,700 tested combinations in Evolve, placing it in the lower portion of the database results.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the Intel Arc B390 shifts as resolution and settings change, but the GPU dominates the performance profile in every scenario recorded. At 3840x2160, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is only 20 FPS (34 down to 14), showing that even drastic reductions in visual quality cannot free up enough GPU headroom. The CPU, with its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 96 MB of L3 cache, is not the bottleneck here; the Arc B390 with 1,536 shading units and a 9th percentile GPU rank simply cannot push enough frames at this pixel count.

At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets widens. Low settings deliver 60 FPS, while Medium drops to 46 FPS, a 14 FPS penalty. High falls to 36 FPS, and Ultra to 25 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU is still the limiting factor, but the CPU is capable of feeding it at the lowest preset. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's single-thread score of 2,080 in Cinebench R23 and its passmark single-thread score of 4,430 suggest it can handle the game's logic and draw calls without issue.

At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence becomes more apparent at the highest settings. Low settings reach 89 FPS, Medium hits 69 FPS, High drops to 54 FPS, and Ultra falls to 37 FPS. The larger spread at 1080p (52 FPS between Low and Ultra) suggests that the GPU is still the primary constraint, but the CPU is better utilized at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's strong multi-threaded performance, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,230 and a passmark multithread score of 40,009, ensures that frame pacing remains stable even when the GPU is saturated.

Across all resolutions, the recorded data shows that the Intel Arc B390 is the decisive component. The GPU's 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest figures that limit the system to 1080p Medium as the highest playable preset. The CPU's capabilities, while substantial, do not translate into higher frame rates at 1440p or 4K because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to benefit from the processor's speed.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the Intel Arc B390 ranks 3,288 out of 3,700 tested combinations in Evolve. This places the system in the bottom 11% of the database, which aligns with the measured frame rates. The rank reflects the severe GPU limitation: the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a top-tier processor, but the Arc B390 is a low-tier integrated GPU, and their pairing produces a system that struggles at higher resolutions.

For context, the CPU alone sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 9th percentile among all GPUs. This mismatch explains the overall combo rank. A system with a more capable discrete GPU would rank significantly higher, but as configured, the Arc B390 holds the entire platform back. The rank of 3,288 out of 3,700 is consistent with the playable settings found: only 1080p Low and Medium, plus 1440p Low, clear the 60 FPS threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve, but only within a narrow range of settings. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, there are no playable settings, and the system fails to reach 60 FPS at any preset. At 2560x1440, Low settings produce exactly 60 FPS on average, making it the only playable option at that resolution. At 1920x1080, both Low and Medium settings are playable, with Medium delivering 69 FPS as the best visual quality that maintains the 60 FPS threshold.

For a player seeking smooth gameplay, the recommended configuration is 1080p with Medium settings. This provides an average of 69 FPS, though the recorded minimum of 59 FPS indicates occasional dips below the target. The alternative is 1080p Low at 89 FPS, which offers a more comfortable margin. At 1440p, Low settings are viable at exactly 60 FPS, but there is no headroom for fluctuation. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming in Evolve under any circumstances, and users with a 4K display would need to lower the resolution or upgrade the GPU to achieve playable frame rates.