Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 21 | 26 | 34 |
| 1440p QHD | 25 | 36 | 46 | 60 |
| 1080p Full HD | 37 | 54 | 69 | 89 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
Evolve, the 2015 multiplayer FPS, places very different demands on a system depending on the resolution chosen. The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the Intel Arc B390 shows a wide performance spread, from a fully fluid experience at 1080p to an unplayable one at 4K. This analysis walks through the measured frame rates, the role each component plays, and what the results mean for anyone considering this combination.
Best Settings per Resolution
The goal is to find the most demanding preset that still maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. The database records a playable threshold of 60 frames per second, and the measured averages are the primary guide.
At 3840x2160 (4K), no settings preset achieves the 60 FPS target. The best recorded average is at Low settings, which produces 34 FPS. Medium settings drop to 26 FPS, High to 21 FPS, and Ultra to 14 FPS. None of these are close to the playable threshold, so there is no recommended setting for this resolution. The verdict data confirms this, listing no playable settings at 4K.
At 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves but remains limited. The only preset that clears the 60 FPS bar is Low, which records an average of exactly 60 FPS. This is the best settings choice for this resolution because it is the most demanding preset that still meets the playability threshold. Medium settings fall to 46 FPS, High to 36 FPS, and Ultra to 25 FPS. The database's verdict section confirms Low as the best setting at 1440p, with an average FPS of 60.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combination finds its footing. Low settings deliver 89 FPS, but the best settings selection goes to Medium, which averages 69 FPS. This is the highest preset that remains at or above 60 FPS. High settings drop to 54 FPS, just below the threshold, while Ultra manages only 37 FPS. The verdict data lists both Low and Medium as playable at 1080p, with Medium being the best choice at 69 FPS average.
The pattern is clear: this hardware scales sharply with resolution. 1080p Medium is the ceiling for a smooth experience, 1440p is playable only on Low, and 4K is entirely out of reach for 60 FPS gameplay.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics processor at higher resolutions, while the central processor becomes more relevant as resolution drops. The Intel Arc B390 sits in the 9th percentile among all GPUs according to its benchmark score, which places it near the very bottom of the performance distribution. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, both of which are older, low-end parts.
Looking at the frame rate scaling between resolutions at the same settings reveals where the bottleneck sits. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 89 at 1080p, to 60 at 1440p, to 34 at 4K. That is a drop of 29 FPS from 1080p to 1440p, and another 26 FPS from 1440p to 4K. The consistent decline with each resolution increase points to the GPU being the limiting factor. The Arc B390's pixel rate is recorded at 60.00 GPixel/s and its texture rate at 120.0 GTexel/s, figures that are modest for modern gaming and explain why higher pixel counts overwhelm it.
At Medium settings, the same trend appears: 69 FPS at 1080p, 46 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. The frame rate nearly halves between each step up in resolution. This is classic GPU-bound behavior, where the graphics processor's fill rate and shading capacity determine the outcome.
The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is a far stronger component. It sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs and records an average benchmark score of 69,996. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, all of which are high-end processors. The 9700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,691. For a game like Evolve, which is a shooter from 2015, the processor's capabilities far exceed what the GPU can feed it at higher resolutions.
At 1080p Low, the system reaches 89 FPS, which is the highest recorded result across all configurations. This suggests the CPU is capable of pushing well beyond 60 FPS, but the GPU begins to limit performance as the pixel load grows. The fact that 1440p Low only manages exactly 60 FPS, and 4K Low falls to 34 FPS, reinforces that the graphics card is the decisive factor. The CPU's role is to keep up with the game's logic and draw calls, and the data indicates it does so without becoming the primary constraint.
In summary, the Intel Arc B390 is the performance ceiling for this pairing. The Ryzen 7 9700F has ample headroom, as evidenced by its high percentile ranking and benchmark scores, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's limitations at 1440p and above. At 1080p, the CPU's strength allows the system to reach its best frame rates, but even there, the GPU's modest specifications keep Ultra settings out of reach.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 4K resolution?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average FPS is 34 at Low settings. Medium averages 26 FPS, High averages 21 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. The verdict data lists no playable settings at this resolution, meaning none reach the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming?
A: Low settings is the only playable option at 2560x1440, with an average of 60 FPS. Medium drops to 46 FPS, High to 36 FPS, and Ultra to 25 FPS. The database's verdict confirms Low as the best setting at this resolution.
Q: What settings should I use at 1080p?
A: Medium settings is the best choice, delivering an average of 69 FPS. Low runs faster at 89 FPS, but Medium offers higher visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS threshold. High falls slightly short at 54 FPS, and Ultra averages 37 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Intel Arc B390 ranks in the 9th percentile among all GPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F ranks in the 94th percentile among CPUs. Frame rates drop consistently as resolution increases, indicating the graphics card cannot keep up with higher pixel counts.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Arc B390's average benchmark score is 1,482. Its closest competitors are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1,463 and is 1.3% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce 800M at 1,460 and 1.5% slower, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM at 1,446 and 2.5% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 at 1,443 and 2.7% slower. All of these are low-end parts, confirming the B390's position near the bottom of the GPU performance chart.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9700F have enough processing power for Evolve?
A: Yes. The CPU records a PassMark multithread score of 36,470 and a single-thread score of 4,691, placing it in the 94th percentile. Its nearest rivals are high-end chips like the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The processor is not the bottleneck; the GPU holds the system back at higher resolutions.
The Verdict
The question of whether this PC can run Evolve depends entirely on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the answer is yes, with Medium settings providing a comfortable 69 FPS average, well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low settings run even faster at 89 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system is barely playable, with Low settings hitting exactly 60 FPS and nothing higher. At 3840x2160, the system cannot run the game smoothly at any preset, with the best case being 34 FPS on Low.
For a 1080p monitor, this combination is a viable option for Evolve, provided the user sticks to Medium or Low settings. For 1440p, it is a marginal experience that requires the lowest visual preset. For 4K, it is not suitable for playable frame rates. The verdict data aligns with these conclusions: playable settings exist at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K.
The GPU's low percentile ranking, 9th among all GPUs, is the core issue. The CPU, by contrast, has performance in the top 6% of all processors. This imbalance means the system's gaming potential is capped by the Intel Arc B390, and no amount of CPU headroom can overcome that at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following figures are the exact recorded averages, minimums, and maximums from the database for this CPU and GPU combination.
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: 34 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Medium: 26 FPS average, 22 FPS minimum, 30 FPS maximum
- High: 21 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Ultra: 14 FPS average, no min or max recorded
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: 60 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Medium: 46 FPS average, 39 FPS minimum, 53 FPS maximum
- High: 36 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Ultra: 25 FPS average, no min or max recorded
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: 89 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Medium: 69 FPS average, 59 FPS minimum, 79 FPS maximum
- High: 54 FPS average, no min or max recorded
- Ultra: 37 FPS average, no min or max recorded
The minimum and maximum data points for Medium settings show the variance users can expect. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate swings from 59 to 79, with an average of 69. That 59 FPS minimum is just under the playable threshold, so brief dips below 60 are possible even at the recommended setting. At 1440p Medium, the range is 39 to 53, consistently below 60. At 4K Medium, the range is 22 to 30, firmly in unplayable territory.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Intel Arc B390 combination ranks 3,288 out of 3,700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the bottom 11% of all configurations in the database. The ranking reflects the GPU's severe limitations, as the CPU alone would rank much higher. The 9th percentile GPU score drags the overall combo down, despite the 94th percentile CPU score.
This low ranking is consistent with the measured frame rates. A combo that cannot maintain 60 FPS at 1440p on Medium, and cannot reach 60 FPS at 4K on any setting, will naturally sit near the bottom of a ranking that includes many more capable graphics cards. Users should interpret this rank as a warning: the system is functional for light 1080p gaming, but it is not a competitive gaming rig by modern standards.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has several near neighbors in the database. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875, which is 0.2% higher than the 9700F's 69,996, meaning it is effectively identical in performance. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,163, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515, which is 0.7% lower. The Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69,355, which is 0.9% lower. Any of these processors would deliver nearly the same CPU-bound behavior in Evolve, meaning they would not change the outcome at higher resolutions where the GPU is the constraint.
For the GPU, the Intel Arc B390's nearest rivals are all older, low-end NVIDIA parts. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1,463, which is 1.3% lower than the B390's 1,482. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1,460, which is 1.5% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1,446, which is 2.5% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1,443, which is 2.7% lower. These deltas are small, so swapping the B390 for any of these cards would produce similar frame rates in Evolve. The GT 520MX and 800M, in particular, would behave almost identically, with less than 2% difference in their benchmark scores.
In practical terms, users with any of these alternative GPUs should expect the same limitations: playable frame rates at 1080p on Low or Medium, marginal performance at 1440p on Low, and no viable option at 4K. The CPU alternatives, meanwhile, would preserve the same high headroom, but none of them would unlock higher frame rates in this game because the graphics card remains the limiting factor.