Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 47 | 60 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 82 | 105 | 135 |
| 1080p Full HD | 85 | 122 | 156 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 places in the 1720th position out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve. That rank puts this configuration in the upper-middle portion of the database, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of the recorded systems while trailing the top-tier hardware. The percentile ranking for the CPU alone is 94, indicating the Ryzen 7 9700F is near the top of all processors tested, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile among all graphics cards. This gap between the two components suggests the pairing is CPU-heavy in terms of raw capability, but the actual gameplay results show the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The combo rank of 1720 reflects a balanced but not elite standing; it is a system that can handle the game comfortably at many settings, but it is not positioned to dominate at maximum quality on the largest displays.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1720 out of 3700 places this PC in the 46.5th percentile of all tested combinations for Evolve. That is a solidly mid-pack result — not a top performer, but far from a weak one. The CPU’s individual standing is much stronger, ranking in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s 58th percentile is more modest. The discrepancy explains the overall rank: the processor has headroom to spare, but the graphics card anchors the system’s performance tier. In practical terms, this means the Ryzen 7 9700F is never the bottleneck in this game; the RX 7700 dictates what frame rates are achievable. The 3700-combo pool includes many systems with faster GPUs, which is why this pairing does not crack the top half. However, the data shows that the combo still delivers playable results at every resolution tested, which is a meaningful achievement given the rank.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, which produces an average of exactly 60 frames per second with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 68. Low at this resolution averages 77 FPS, but Medium is the highest quality option that clears the 60 FPS threshold. High and Ultra fall short, with averages of 47 and 32 FPS respectively. Moving down to 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 82 FPS. Medium runs at 105 FPS and Low at 135 FPS, but High offers the best visual quality while still staying well above the 60 FPS line. Ultra at this resolution dips to 57 FPS, just under the threshold. At 1920x1080, the situation reverses completely: Ultra is playable with an average of 85 FPS. High runs at 122 FPS, Medium at 156 FPS, and Low at 201 FPS, but the Ultra preset is the one to choose for maximum quality without sacrificing smoothness. The pattern is clear — the RX 7700 has enough headroom for the game’s most demanding preset at 1080p, but at 1440p and 4K, users must step down one or two quality levels to maintain a consistent 60 FPS experience.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Ryzen 7 9700F and the RX 7700 shifts noticeably across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s strength is evident: the frame rates scale dramatically with preset changes, from 201 FPS at Low to 85 FPS at Ultra, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint but the CPU keeps feeding it efficiently. The single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 for the CPU are high enough to avoid holding back the GPU at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the GPU begins to dominate the equation. The drop from 135 FPS at Low to 57 FPS at Ultra is steeper than the resolution change alone would explain, showing that the RX 7700’s pixel throughput is becoming the limiting factor. The GPU’s texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s are respectable, but they are not enough to maintain high frame rates at Ultra settings on a 1440p panel. At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost entirely responsible for performance. The CPU’s role diminishes to the point where even the Low preset only yields 77 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 32 FPS. The 4K results clearly indicate that the RX 7700’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the workload, but the raw compute power — 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 — is not enough to push Ultra settings at this resolution. The scaling between resolutions and presets tells the story: the CPU is a capable partner at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s limits define the experience at higher ones.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?
A: Yes, but only at Medium settings or lower. The measured data shows 60 FPS average at Medium (with a 51 FPS minimum) and 77 FPS at Low. High and Ultra presets fall below the threshold at 47 and 32 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the best quality preset for 1440p gaming?
A: High settings provide the best balance, averaging 82 FPS. Ultra drops to 57 FPS, which is just under the 60 FPS playable threshold, so High is the recommended choice for consistent performance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?
A: The GPU is the deciding factor. At 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to support up to 201 FPS at Low settings, but the GPU limits Ultra to 85 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck, with the CPU contributing little to the difference between presets.
Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RX 7700 scores 20974 in PassMark G3D, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (a -0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (a +1.1% delta). It is slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (-1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-1.7%).
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The average is 85 FPS with no reported minimum or maximum values in the data. This comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, making Ultra fully playable at this resolution.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9700F bottleneck the RX 7700 in Evolve?
A: No. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 place it in the 94th percentile, and the frame rates scale consistently with GPU load. The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor at all resolutions, not the processor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the full range of presets is playable. Low runs at an average of 201 FPS, Medium at 156 FPS with a minimum of 133 and maximum of 179, High at 122 FPS, and Ultra at 85 FPS. The minimum and maximum values are only recorded for the Medium preset, so the other settings have no frame time variance data. At 2560x1440, Low averages 135 FPS, Medium averages 105 FPS with a range of 89 to 120, High averages 82 FPS, and Ultra averages 57 FPS — the only preset at this resolution that fails to reach the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the results are more constrained: Low averages 77 FPS, Medium averages 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 and maximum of 68, High averages 47 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K is the only one at any resolution that sits exactly on the 60 FPS boundary, with its minimum dipping to 51 FPS, indicating occasional drops below the playable threshold. The data shows a consistent pattern: each resolution step down from 4K to 1080p roughly doubles the frame rate at the same preset, confirming that the GPU’s fill rate is the dominant factor.
The Verdict
This PC can run Evolve, but the experience depends heavily on the display resolution. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 85 FPS — this is the ideal environment for this hardware. At 2560x1440, High is the best playable setting at 82 FPS, while Ultra falls just short at 57 FPS; users must choose between quality and smoothness at this resolution. At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable, with Medium hitting exactly 60 FPS and Low at 77 FPS. The verdict is clear: this is a strong 1080p machine, a capable 1440p machine with settings adjustments, and a limited 4K machine that requires significant compromises. The Ryzen 7 9700F provides ample processing power, but the RX 7700’s mid-tier GPU performance caps the system’s potential at higher resolutions. For gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combo delivers a smooth experience; for 4K enthusiasts, it will suffice only at reduced quality settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 (a 0.2% delta from the 9700F’s 69996), the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70163 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69355 (0.9%). All four processors are within one percent of the Ryzen 7 9700F’s average score, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical performance in Evolve when paired with the RX 7700. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (-0.1% from the RX 7700’s 15852), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (-1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-1.7%). The RX 7700 sits almost exactly between these cards in benchmark score, so swapping to any of them would produce frame rates within a few percent of the measured results. Notably, the RTX 3060 Ti is the strongest of the group, but the difference is small enough that the gameplay experience would be nearly indistinguishable. For users looking at alternative hardware, these rivals represent the closest performance matches, with the caveat that the R9 370X and Pro W5500 are older or workstation-oriented cards that may lack the same feature set.