Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 41 | 52 | 67 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 72 | 92 | 118 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 107 | 137 | 176 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination delivers a performance profile that scales predictably with resolution and settings in Evolve, offering a clear path to smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K remains demanding. The measured data shows a system that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate esports-style play at lower resolutions but requires careful settings management to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS experience at higher graphical loads.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces its strongest results, with all four tested presets clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 176 FPS, which represents the highest frame rate recorded in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield an average of 137 FPS, with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 157 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution that indicates consistent performance. High settings drop to an average of 107 FPS, still offering a substantial buffer above the 60 FPS threshold. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 74 FPS, which comfortably exceeds the playability standard, though the lack of min/max data for this preset leaves some uncertainty about frame pacing under heavy load.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture shifts noticeably. The Low preset remains exceptionally fast, averaging 118 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS line. Medium settings produce an average of 92 FPS, with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS — the minimum here stays above the playable threshold, suggesting the system can handle sustained scenes without dipping below 60. High settings average 72 FPS, which clears the threshold with a modest 12 FPS margin, meaning that demanding sequences could potentially push the frame rate close to the limit. Ultra drops to an average of 50 FPS, which falls short of the 60 FPS target, making this preset unsuitable for consistent smooth play at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, 4K gaming becomes a significant challenge for this hardware combination. The Low preset is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, averaging 67 FPS. Medium settings average 52 FPS, with a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 60 FPS — the maximum barely touches the playable line, but the average and minimum both fall short. High drops to an average of 41 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS, both far below the 60 FPS target and indicating that these presets are not viable for smooth gameplay at 4K.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions and presets. The Ryzen 7 7700, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, provides a strong foundation for frame generation at lower resolutions. This is evident in the 1080p results, where the Low preset reaches 176 FPS — a figure that relies heavily on the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic updates. The CPU's 3DMark scores, including 8,484 for 16 threads and 1,049 for single-thread, indicate robust multi-threaded and single-threaded performance that supports high frame rates without becoming a bottleneck.
As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The RX 9060, built on RDNA 4.0 with 1,792 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, shows its limits at 4K. The transition from 1080p Low (176 FPS) to 1440p Low (118 FPS) represents a 33% drop, while moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low (67 FPS) shows a further 43% decline. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario at higher pixel counts, where the render load increases faster than the CPU's ability to compensate.
Preset scaling also highlights the GPU's role. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Ultra costs 102 FPS (176 to 74), a 58% reduction that reflects the increased shading, texture, and post-processing demands. At 4K, the same preset jump costs 39 FPS (67 to 28), a 58% reduction as well — but the absolute numbers are much lower, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K regardless of settings. The CPU's contribution is more visible at 1080p, where the frame rate ceiling is high enough that both components matter, but at 4K, the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth simply cannot keep pace with the pixel throughput required.
How This Combo Ranks
The Ryzen 7 7700 + RX 9060 combination ranks 2,181 out of 3,700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the 59th percentile of all configurations. This mid-pack ranking reflects the system's ability to handle the game at mainstream resolutions while falling behind higher-tier hardware at extreme settings. The ranking position is consistent with the measured FPS data, which shows strong 1080p and 1440p performance but struggles at 4K Ultra.
The CPU's individual standing helps contextualize the combo's overall position. The Ryzen 7 7700 scores in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,081. This puts it in the upper tier of processors, capable of supporting high frame rates without bottlenecking. The GPU, however, sits in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,014. The gap between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's mid-tier percentile suggests that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing, which aligns with the observed resolution scaling where GPU-bound scenarios show the most significant frame rate drops.
The combination's rank of 2,181 out of 3,700 means it outperforms roughly 41% of tested configurations. This is a respectable position for a mainstream gaming setup, but it indicates that many other combos deliver higher frame rates, particularly those with more powerful GPUs. The data suggests that the CPU has headroom to drive a stronger graphics card, meaning the RX 9060 is the component that holds back the system's overall ranking in Evolve.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly in Evolve. For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 7700's closest competitors include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, which scores 40,048 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core 5 221E at 40,144 (0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40,246 (0.4% slower), and the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40,313 (0.6% slower). These processors would deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, meaning any of them paired with the RX 9060 would produce similar results at 1080p Low or Medium settings where the CPU plays a larger role.
On the GPU side, the RX 9060's nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 (0.7% faster), the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15,862 (1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15,852 (1% slower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679 (2.1% slower). These deltas are small enough that swapping the RX 9060 for any of these cards would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Evolve. The RTX 3060 Ti would offer a marginal improvement, while the R9 370X and RX 7700 would be slightly slower but still within the same performance class.
For a user considering alternatives, the data indicates that the CPU can be swapped among its rivals with minimal impact on Evolve performance, as the differences are all under 1%. The GPU choices are similarly close, with the largest delta being just 2.1% for the Pro W5500. This means that any combination of the listed CPUs and GPUs would behave very similarly, with the overall frame rates determined more by the resolution and preset than by which specific rival component is chosen.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 1080p with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 74 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes Ultra the best playable setting at this resolution.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers an average of 72 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages only 50 FPS, so High is the best setting that maintains smooth gameplay.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: Only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 Low preset averages 67 FPS, barely clearing the threshold. Medium averages 52 FPS with a minimum of 44 FPS, and High and Ultra fall to 41 and 28 FPS respectively, making them unplayable.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in this system?
A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16,129, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16,014. This translates to a negligible difference in Evolve frame rates, well within the margin of measurement error.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 a good match for the RX 9060?
A: The CPU ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 59th percentile. This imbalance means the processor has significant headroom, and the graphics card is the primary constraint on performance, especially at higher resolutions.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 137 FPS, with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 157 FPS. This provides a very smooth experience with plenty of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Evolve with smooth, playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, and even offers a playable option at 4K with reduced settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, with the best playable setting being Ultra at an average of 74 FPS. This makes the resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, with Medium offering 137 FPS and Low reaching 176 FPS for competitive play.
At 2560x1440, the system maintains playability across Low, Medium, and High settings, with High being the best option at 72 FPS average. The Ultra preset falls short at 50 FPS, so users should stick to High or below for consistent smoothness. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance with an average of 67 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below the 60 FPS line. For 4K gaming, users must accept significant visual compromises, but the game remains technically playable at the lowest settings.
The data shows that this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers a strong balance of frame rate and visual quality. The mid-pack ranking of 2,181 out of 3,700 combos reflects this reality — it is a capable mainstream system that excels at standard resolutions but cannot push extreme settings at 4K. For most players targeting 1080p or 1440p, this PC will provide a thoroughly enjoyable Evolve experience without requiring hardware changes.